TigeeDaleC

Hope it’s a wreck.

Near the old plantation home. St George fire onsite. No traffic allowed.

There were many concerned. Note that even though she received over 40% in the first election a large turnout for Fleming made the race competitive.

An Advocate article in the hard copy newspaper just yesterday said polling by a major Letlow supporter shows Fleming ahead. The Central City News has the hard copy version posted on Facebook, while the Advocate online version has been edited to remove that part of the report. Remember, the Advocate already endorsed Letlow.

Actually, the Constitution originally provided for the state legislatures to select us senators. That got changed by the 17th amendment, which contributed to the imbalance of power we’ve seen over the last century.

I know Chris, and work with him sometimes. He runs an honest podcast and pulls no punches with accurate reporting and no fake news. You don’t have to agree with him but character assassination rather than contesting his opinions and reporting is weak advocacy.

Strictly personal opinion: The challenge for black candidates in Louisiana is not that they are black ---- it's that they are Democrats. The Democrat party has become anti-American, as shown by almost everything they do.

Virginia Judge Voids Redistricting Amendment, Invalidates All Votes from Tuesday's Special Election. LINK

Judge Jack Hurley, a Republican appointee, declared the Democratic-backed measure unconstitutional on multiple grounds, permanently blocking the state from implementing new congressional maps. Attorney General Jay Jones vowed an immediate appeal.

Anyone who sits out this election or votes Dem as a protest against Repubs should just light themselves on fire (figuratively). Such a vote guarantees bad results for our families and freedom. The world is counting on us to be the last hedge against tyranny. Sure, it's not perfect, but letting the socialists take over fixes nothing.

Private entities may not expropriate land in Louisiana due to Constitutional amendment passed in response to SCOTUS decision that federal Constitution did prohibit private expropriation. March 2026 LaSC opinion affirmed that provision.

quote:

---

End this ponzi scheme and stop taking my money.

---

Well, speaking as a Boomer, we were required to pay into the Ponzi scheme under the threat of imprisonment, robbing us of the ability to build for retirement with that money. But it is indeed a Ponzi scheme.

What if young folks were allowed to opt out of paying a significant part of the SS tax as long as that money goes into a qualified retirement account AND they forgo SS? How does that math work out for the SS program? How does the math work for the younger person (pretty sure private investment will far exceed the SS benefit) As Boomers age and pass away, they fall off the payments and young folks not getting on SS never get on the payments, what is the actuarial impact? Where is the balance between treating Boomers fairly and treating young folks fairly?