Started By
Message

re: Question about relationships, economic advantage of one party, and chores

Posted on 6/6/18 at 12:53 pm to
Posted by Sao
East Texas Piney Woods
Member since Jun 2009
65937 posts
Posted on 6/6/18 at 12:53 pm to

Pod Of Geauxld?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423384 posts
Posted on 6/6/18 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

this guy.... he gets it

so you're purposefully sabotage the economic potential/realization of your spouse b/c you're jealous? or upset that the person who does chores in your house isn't the person you believe should be doing them?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423384 posts
Posted on 6/6/18 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

So someone wants to take on a 2nd job in order to pay someone to do a job, they could do, if they didn't have the 2nd job?

yes but the 2nd job would pay more than the cost of the chores. it's not an even split
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
29227 posts
Posted on 6/6/18 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

I find anytime you focus on “fairness” in a relationship it’s already failing. Nothing will ever be “fair”, and focusing on fairness always just leads to anger/bitterness



This. It’s a relationship, you should want to do whatever you can to help the other person, make their day better, make life happy, etc. Divying up chores and worrying about who brings in what income is an economic partnership and not a relationship.
Posted by Slagathor
Makin' jokes about your teeny tiny
Member since Jul 2007
37889 posts
Posted on 6/6/18 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

yes but the 2nd job would pay more than the cost of the chores. it's not an even split


I'm having trouble wrapping my head around any lack of support for this. You're getting paid money (with leftover money) to do something fun. Some of your household chores are being done by a pro.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32733 posts
Posted on 6/6/18 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

OK here is the scenario. You have a couple with an even split of household chores (just a general concept, the individual chores are irrelevant but the labor split is 50/50). One party wants to engage in a second job and use the income from that job to pay the help to hire someone to do his/her chores, and the couple will still receive excess income above the cost of this help. The other member of the couple is not capable of earning this income (let's assume he/she has restrictions on their job so they can't receive 2nd income).

Is this fair?


I guess it's "fair", but relationships aren't about "fair". This would bring up issues, IMO. It's a slippery slope, are we assuming that both parties make an equal salary in their current jobs? If not, that brings up another issue. If chores are split 50/50, and 50% of the chores are being done by someone else, there is still half of the chores remaining and that should be split between the two parties.

Posted by Swoopin
Member since Jun 2011
22031 posts
Posted on 6/6/18 at 1:00 pm to
I would argue that a healthy relationship attempts to split the hardships and balance eachother happiness.

Depending on just how much of an enjoyable breeze the 2nd job is, that person would ideally offer to take something negative off of the other's plate.

Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 6/6/18 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

oh i know i'm not wrong and i know it will 100% create conflict


Right...but I'm afraid this is what this conversation is going to sound like though...

quote:

it seems that the primary arguments against this set up are inefficient and based in only emotion

that can be flipped around. why would you ever want to inhibit your spouse/significant other from their economic potential over silly chores (that aren't even ignored. they do get done. just by 3rd parties)


Just no...no. I'm telling you this with 20+ years of happy marriage in my rear view mirror. My wife is the absolute coolest and even I think she'd quietly be pissy if I tried this. Of course it's about emotion...
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423384 posts
Posted on 6/6/18 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

If chores are split 50/50, and 50% of the chores are being done by someone else, there is still half of the chores remaining and that should be split between the two parties.

so one person works more to pay for half the chores and still should do half the remaining chores?
Posted by chryso
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
11926 posts
Posted on 6/6/18 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

yes but the 2nd job would pay more than the cost of the chores. it's not an even split


Could the second job pay for all of the chores?
Posted by Motorboat
At the camp
Member since Oct 2007
22707 posts
Posted on 6/6/18 at 1:02 pm to
SFP--I'm not ging back to your first post. Does your wife work? If so, then why wouldn't you both pay for help and not have any chores?

It seems very affordable with dual incomes, one being an attorney.
Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 6/6/18 at 1:04 pm to
This thread seems a little Zucky.

Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
101930 posts
Posted on 6/6/18 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

so one person works more to pay for half the chores and still should do half the remaining chores?


It depends on what those chores are. You say it's irrelevant, but it's really not.

ETA: And you aren't working more TO pay for half the chores. That's just a secondary or tertiary benefit at best.
This post was edited on 6/6/18 at 1:07 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423384 posts
Posted on 6/6/18 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

This thread seems a little Zucky.

i was the original autistic robot, bruv

i'm just now getting back in the groove after about 6 months "off"
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423384 posts
Posted on 6/6/18 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

It depends on what those chores are. You say it's irrelevant, but it's really not.

divide them up however your brain feels is most fair. it was left vague for a reason, it's not supposed to matter, so you can divide it however you want so that it matters the least
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
35558 posts
Posted on 6/6/18 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

that can be flipped around. why would you ever want to inhibit your spouse/significant other from their economic potential over silly chores (that aren't even ignored. they do get done. just by 3rd parties)


Your op doesn't have enough info. Does the second job preclude the other person from doing chores?

If you do a one hour podcast once or twice a week, what are you doing the other 5 days a week?

Your situation makes more sense if the second job is something that would make it entirely unreasonable to do any additional work at home, as in they are working 12-14 hour days or something like that.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32733 posts
Posted on 6/6/18 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

it seems that the primary arguments against this set up are inefficient and based in only emotion

that can be flipped around. why would you ever want to inhibit your spouse/significant other from their economic potential over silly chores (that aren't even ignored. they do get done. just by 3rd parties)

Relationships/marriages are emotional, not logical.

I can't tell my wife "Hey, I make more money than you, so I'm going to pay someone to do all of my chores, while you still have to work and come home and do chores".
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
146214 posts
Posted on 6/6/18 at 1:07 pm to
Why the frick would anyone take a second job to pay for someone to do work for you and just break even?

If anyone in my household is going to take a second job...it's not to hire help and break even.....
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423384 posts
Posted on 6/6/18 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

Could the second job pay for all of the chores?

that is a follow up. i was really hoping to get more female input in the thread before going there

but that was going to be where i tried to divert the conversation about page 3-5: "what if the second job paid for all the chores?"
Posted by chryso
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
11926 posts
Posted on 6/6/18 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

so one person works more to pay for half the chores and still should do half the remaining chores?


I think the issue is more than the chores. When you are both home doing chores you are together, you are working like a team. If you get a second job you are no longer together.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram