- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Missing 18 year old's body found on Horn Island - and ridiculous reactions.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 3:03 pm to Tiger Prawn
Posted on 7/10/26 at 3:03 pm to Tiger Prawn
quote:
Why would they need lawyers for social media harassment?
Are you really this dense?
Nolan’s family lawyered up with a prominent race baiter attorney who is implying that Nolan’s friends are responsible for his death. Why the frick wouldn’t you lawyer up in that situation?
That same lawyer was on Today show on NBC this morning saying it is a race issue because he was only black guy on the whole island.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 3:06 pm to Scruffy
quote:
If you ever have to talk to the police in a situation like this, or really any situation, you should have a lawyer present.
The notion that retaining legal counsel makes a person appear more guilty is retarded and makes you sound like someone who would defend police tactics to force a confession even when innocent.
ALWAYS retain counsel.
That's fair. Truth be told, I've always been of the mindset that if you have to retain counsel in a situation where you are 100% in the clear from any and everything. Then there's a good possibility you are hiding something. Ie You may not be guilty of the actual crime, but you may have known something/saw something along the way. But then again, I could very well be wrong in that assumption. I've never been in a case where I've had to talk to police, etc.
So, question: do investigators and prosecutors look at it suspiciously at all when witnesses hire an attorney before speaking with police? Or is that seen neutrally, legally speaking?
Posted on 7/10/26 at 3:13 pm to Doctor B
quote:
Me rolling out of bed with no law degree and fricking these bald-headed people up in five seconds
Crump should have been disbarred with the fake witness shite he pulled during the Trayvon Martin fiasco.
There's is a lesson to be be learned in this story. Don't have black friends because their parents will play the ghetto lottery with your life should something bad happen.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 3:17 pm to QJenk
quote:
But then again, I could very well be wrong in that assumption.
You are. And that's ok. Now you know. If you have to deal with LE, even if you are completely innocent of anything and everything, get a lawyer. That isn't an opinion.
quote:
So, question: do investigators and prosecutors look at it suspiciously at all when witnesses hire an attorney before speaking with police? Or is that seen neutrally, legally speaking?
They might(probably will) try and use it against you, but they absolutely know that the intelligent thing to do is to retain counsel. Of course they won't like it, it takes power away from them, but that isn't your problem.
This post was edited on 7/10/26 at 3:25 pm
Posted on 7/10/26 at 3:21 pm to QJenk
Still think his boys did him wrong?
Posted on 7/10/26 at 3:21 pm to QJenk
Yea you have the wrong mindset, but from your earlier comments you seem to have lived a somewhat sheltered life, no offense intended. Doesn't matter how it's seen, lawyer up and protect yourself.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 3:22 pm to QJenk
quote:
That's fair. Truth be told, I've always been of the mindset that if you have to retain counsel in a situation where you are 100% in the clear from any and everything. Then there's a good possibility you are hiding something.
You understand that speaking to the cops under any circumstance is a horrible idea, right? You are not "hiding anything" by retaining counsel, you are protecting yourself, law enforcements ultimate goal is to build a case and when you talk to the cops this diminishes your legal leverage and what you say can be used against you.
Ask yourself this, do you think a cop or anyone working in law enforcement would speak to investigators if there name was brought up for anything, without counsel being present?
Posted on 7/10/26 at 3:23 pm to QJenk
quote:
That's fair. Truth be told, I've always been of the mindset that if you have to retain counsel in a situation where you are 100% in the clear from any and everything. Then there's a good possibility you are hiding something. Ie You may not be guilty of the actual crime, but you may have known something/saw something along the way. But then again, I could very well be wrong in that assumption. I've never been in a case where I've had to talk to police, etc.
So, question: do investigators and prosecutors look at it suspiciously at all when witnesses hire an attorney before speaking with police? Or is that seen neutrally, legally speaking?
you definitely are very ignorant of real life.
Go watch the movie about that guy who the FBI thought was the Unabomber
Open your damn eyes to the real world
This post was edited on 7/10/26 at 3:24 pm
Posted on 7/10/26 at 3:23 pm to QJenk
quote:
That's fair. Truth be told, I've always been of the mindset that if you have to retain counsel in a situation where you are 100% in the clear from any and everything. Then there's a good possibility you are hiding something. Ie You may not be guilty of the actual crime, but you may have known something/saw something along the way. But then again, I could very well be wrong in that assumption. I've never been in a case where I've had to talk to police, etc.
And this mindset explains why there’s probably more black people (and low income people) in prison than there needs to be.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 3:27 pm to Freight Joker
Would be weird if a culture that is so distrustful of the police / system that choose to not take advantage of the rights that are given to them by our legal system
chiefly they can't not be questioned without an attorney unless you waive that right
If you think the system is out to get you stop talking to the system without your rights fully engaged
chiefly they can't not be questioned without an attorney unless you waive that right
If you think the system is out to get you stop talking to the system without your rights fully engaged
This post was edited on 7/10/26 at 3:32 pm
Posted on 7/10/26 at 3:28 pm to Dixie2023
quote:They leave no choice; you have to file immediately.
Absolutely. They are being blamed as white kids killing a black kid. Lawyer up asap. In fact, I might file my own suit against those parents and grifters.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 3:29 pm to Funky Tide 8
quote:Who cares, f them.
So, question: do investigators and prosecutors look at it suspiciously at all when witnesses hire an attorney before speaking with police?
Posted on 7/10/26 at 3:30 pm to QJenk
quote:
That's fair. Truth be told, I've always been of the mindset that if you have to retain counsel in a situation where you are 100% in the clear from any and everything. Then there's a good possibility you are hiding something. Ie You may not be guilty of the actual crime, but you may have known something/saw something along the way. But then again, I could very well be wrong in that assumption. I've never been in a case where I've had to talk to police, etc.
Police interrogators are not your friends, even if you did nothing wrong. Its their job to get someone to admit to something incriminating or get a confession. They aren't getting that info by being nice to you and asking softball questions. Being questioned, even if you're innocent, can still be intimidating...especially for someone who's young and/or never been in trouble before. They're not joking when they say "anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law" so you should always exercise your right to an attorney.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 3:33 pm to BRich
Any clues suggesting anything suspicious went on (besides skin color)? If not the main takeaway is this: don’t be friends with black people. It’ll be used against you.
This post was edited on 7/10/26 at 3:35 pm
Posted on 7/10/26 at 3:34 pm to Funky Tide 8
quote:
Well, the black kid in the video didn't remotely resemble Wells
You should post that and say "but I guess they all look the same to you". Or if there's nothing in your profile indicating your race, say we instead of they.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 3:36 pm to QJenk
quote:
That's fair. Truth be told, I've always been of the mindset that if you have to retain counsel in a situation where you are 100% in the clear from any and everything. Then there's a good possibility you are hiding something. Ie You may not be guilty of the actual crime, but you may have known something/saw something along the way. But then again, I could very well be wrong in that assumption. I've never been in a case where I've had to talk to police, etc.
So, question: do investigators and prosecutors look at it suspiciously at all when witnesses hire an attorney before speaking with police? Or is that seen neutrally, legally speaking?
In this situation, where the deceased's family has already hired the biggest race baiting POS attorney there is, coupled with the fact that at least one of these kids' parents is a judge, it would be very odd if they DIDN'T lawyer up.
Plus, it looks like most were drinking from the pictures. At the very least they could be facing some questions on operating the boat under the influence.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 3:37 pm to QJenk
quote:
But then again I've seen some suggest that they hired lawyers immediately,
If you are able, you should always hire a lawyer when dealing with law enforcement.
It is a fool’s game to assume guilt or innocence based on the hiring of an attorney.
If those were my kids, they would’ve been lawyered up immediately.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 3:38 pm to dalefla
quote:
Crump should have been disbarred with the fake witness shite he pulled during the Trayvon Martin fiasco.
There's is a lesson to be be learned in this story. Don't have black friends because their parents will play the ghetto lottery with your life should something bad happen.
Yep and yep (sadly).
Posted on 7/10/26 at 3:46 pm to UpToPar
quote:
Plus, it looks like most were drinking from the pictures. At the very least they could be facing some questions on operating the boat under the influence.
Probably have to worry about civil lawsuit for wrongful death too against whoever provided the alcohol that day. Especially if the autopsy and toxicology report indicate that alcohol may have been a contributing factor in his drowning or whatever else happened.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 3:53 pm to Tiger Prawn
I’m a bit shocked that the black community is taking on this tragedy. It’s clear the mom is not fully black and no one is as racist as black folks against mixed black folks.
Also, has it been mentioned who Nolan’s father is? He has a different last name than the rest of the family.
Also, has it been mentioned who Nolan’s father is? He has a different last name than the rest of the family.
Popular
Back to top


1








