- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latoya recall has failed. Only had 27k signatures. edit: 40k signatures were rejected
Posted on 3/21/23 at 12:53 pm to NoSaint
Posted on 3/21/23 at 12:53 pm to NoSaint
quote:
Or they turned in the strong batch first and their own internal audit concerns later to minimize the time the registrar would have them in hand
If so, they might have screwed up big time. From what I understand reading the documentation from the registrar, the 5 day grace period only applies to new signatures and any signatures obtained prior to the original deadline would have had to go in the first batch to be considered.
“Signature dated before petitioner deadline” was one of the rejection reasons listed under “other.”
4
Posted on 3/21/23 at 12:54 pm to jamboybarry
quote:
They turned in like 60k signatures
Something is fricky
Think they verify the votes like they did with these signatures? LOLOLOL
Don't need an ID to vote, but we need to verify these recall signatures!
Posted on 3/21/23 at 12:54 pm to Damone
Congrats! You won!
Posted on 3/21/23 at 12:56 pm to LSUJML
quote:
They should break down per other code I’d like to know how many were rejected for profanity
Agreed.. especially when that category includes like 2/3 of the batch.
quote:
Also what does unable to verify petitioner intent mean?
To me it sounds like the NOLA 2023 version of a hanging chad. But idk.
Posted on 3/21/23 at 12:57 pm to Fun Bunch
The fix is always in with the Dems
Posted on 3/21/23 at 12:59 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
40k signatures were rejected
I know Donald Duck who lives on Esplanade. That is a totally legitimate signature.
Posted on 3/21/23 at 1:00 pm to Fun Bunch
This post was edited on 3/21/23 at 1:08 pm
Posted on 3/21/23 at 1:06 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Gov. John Bel Edwards.
Same guy who supported a lawsuit against a verified election result of St. George.
Posted on 3/21/23 at 1:07 pm to grizzlylongcut
A democrat has no shot for a federal seat in Louisiana
Posted on 3/21/23 at 1:07 pm to TBoy
quote:
know Donald Duck who lives on Esplanade
I was attending jury duty at CDC New Orleans and they called up a guy named Kunta Kente
This post was edited on 3/21/23 at 1:08 pm
Posted on 3/21/23 at 1:07 pm to Fun Bunch
Good. Every single person that chooses to reside there deserves to wallow in the shite they created.
Posted on 3/21/23 at 1:08 pm to J_Hingle
I just find it so hard to believe that almost 2/3 of the signatures were thrown out.
That's either the Orleans Registar effen up big time or organizers not giving AF who signs it, whether from out-of-parish, state etc.
That's either the Orleans Registar effen up big time or organizers not giving AF who signs it, whether from out-of-parish, state etc.
Posted on 3/21/23 at 1:18 pm to Bama Bird
quote:
If it means anything, removing Teedy would do basically nothing as Chicago will soon find out. When the problem is the city itself, changing passive mayor for passive mayor won't do anything.
BINGO
Ok so she somehow gets recalled, who is the next mayor? A carbon copy of LaToya.
The problem is the inhabitants.
Posted on 3/21/23 at 1:18 pm to lostinbr
quote:
From what I understand reading the documentation from the registrar, the 5 day grace period only applies to new signatures and any signatures obtained prior to the original deadline would have had to go in the first batch to be considered.
So they could blanket reject all of those additional signatures because they weren't on time?
Posted on 3/21/23 at 1:18 pm to lostinbr
THOSE are the possible reasons for “other” being listed? Holy shite this was absolutely rigged. They could have at least balanced the rejected numbers to not look so obvious
Posted on 3/21/23 at 1:24 pm to lostinbr
quote:
If so, they might have screwed up big time. From what I understand reading the documentation from the registrar, the 5 day grace period only applies to new signatures and any signatures obtained prior to the original deadline would have had to go in the first batch to be considered.
If true lmao
Posted on 3/21/23 at 1:29 pm to JohnnyKilroy
Edwards May be a slimy democrats but even he can see the absolute cesspool that is BR and NOLA.
Posted on 3/21/23 at 1:29 pm to Fun Bunch
If it was a white republican I bet 40k wouldn't have been tossed.
Posted on 3/21/23 at 1:30 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
according to Gov. John Bel Edwards
did anyone really think he would ok the recall of another Dem?
Posted on 3/21/23 at 1:32 pm to lostinbr
quote:
26,000 of the rejected signatures from the second batch were tagged as “other” for the reason.
Democracy is dead in lib shite areas, they want to rule like kings or kweenz.
This post was edited on 3/21/23 at 1:34 pm
Page 5 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News