- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/8/22 at 8:42 am to DabosDynasty
A question for anyone itt who has studied military doctrine or likes war games:
Some of the cities to the east (Sumy, Chernihiv in the NE) look to be close to being encircled according to the maps floating around our there. The Russians are pushing on Odessa as well.
So the question is would it be better for the Ukrainian units to pull out of these cities and fall back doing a fighting retreat, or rear guard, back to the outskirts of Kyiv (it looks dangerously close to being encircled too). Or do you make the call and tell those units to disperse and blend in and fight a guerilla campaign? Or do they just haul arse to Kyiv and let that be the last stand? In any of the scenarios, I assume the biggest priority would be to keep supply lines open to keep the troops in equipment and ammo.
Once these places to the south and east are encircled, there is no resupply coming. But if Kyiv is encircled, that's pretty much a wrap, right? Well, besides the intense insurgency the Russians will have to try and put down after Kyiv falls.
Anyways, I'm not all that familiar with the strategy of battle, so that seems like it would be a tough decision to make. But maybe it isnt and someone can explain why certain decisions could prove more beneficial.
Some of the cities to the east (Sumy, Chernihiv in the NE) look to be close to being encircled according to the maps floating around our there. The Russians are pushing on Odessa as well.
So the question is would it be better for the Ukrainian units to pull out of these cities and fall back doing a fighting retreat, or rear guard, back to the outskirts of Kyiv (it looks dangerously close to being encircled too). Or do you make the call and tell those units to disperse and blend in and fight a guerilla campaign? Or do they just haul arse to Kyiv and let that be the last stand? In any of the scenarios, I assume the biggest priority would be to keep supply lines open to keep the troops in equipment and ammo.
Once these places to the south and east are encircled, there is no resupply coming. But if Kyiv is encircled, that's pretty much a wrap, right? Well, besides the intense insurgency the Russians will have to try and put down after Kyiv falls.
Anyways, I'm not all that familiar with the strategy of battle, so that seems like it would be a tough decision to make. But maybe it isnt and someone can explain why certain decisions could prove more beneficial.
This post was edited on 3/8/22 at 8:45 am
Posted on 3/8/22 at 8:53 am to IAmNERD
Another post from that random FB guy
quote:
It is the second week of the war. A digital iron curtain is descending across Russia. In its effort to suppress news of the war, and to protect the political privileges of the ruling elite, the Russian government is prepared to close itself from the global internet. By March 11th, Russian websites are required to conform to new government regulations expected to ease their ability to monitor and prosecute digital dissent.
Specimens of Russian ultra-nationalist propaganda are leaking out from Russian media, and they are bizarre if not troubling. It is part of a media blitz intended to build support for the war, and to shout out pacifist dissent with nationalist orgy. Putin has enormous support in Russia, already a quasi-closed society where mass media was already being 'muscled' by the Kremlin, if not outright owned by it. There is no reason to think they are Ukrainian fakes, though that possibility is not unreasonable to doubt at first. Ukraine wants us in this war, and they will go to passionate, selfish and understandable lengths to summon us into conflict. Rather, more surprisingly, these videos and images are private productions performed by genuine Putin partisans - Putinists. Some of the video productions would make Leni Riefenstahl proud.
The letter "Z" takes on doubly ironic connotations of the Nazi swastika at a time when Putin is trying to "de-Nazify" the Ukraine, entrusted to a Jewish President. But the symbology is catching on in Russia where Putinism is popular among the Baby Boomers and Gen X. The popularity of the "Z" finds its origins in the Russian invasion force that launched from Crimea. Vehicles attacking along that axis are marked with a prominent "Z." These impromptu slashes of Zorro were needed to help identify Russian vehicles from Ukrainian vehicles. They both, after all, use the same Soviet-era vehicles and tanks. While we are used to seeing abandoned, smoking and destroyed vehicles marked with a "Z," Russians themselves do not see that. Russians have no idea how badly their soldiers are faring in this war. The only images they are permitted to see of their army are intact vehicles marked with a "Z" getting shipped into the warzone where their army is engaged in a "de-Nazification" operations. That is what they are told, that is what most of them believe.
Expect a widening gap between how the news is presented to the West, and how it is presented to Russians. I expect it will bend our beliefs about what is possible with a controlled vs. free press.
Posted on 3/8/22 at 8:53 am to LegendInMyMind
There is speculation that the second Russian general killed MAY be the nephew of the Russian army chief Valery Gerasimov. TRT World article
Posted on 3/8/22 at 9:01 am to IAmNERD
The only persons who can make that call are those right there on the ground. From where we sit, we don't have enough info to make the call.
If you decline to defend your large urban city, you maintain the ability to maneuver. If you defend your city, you may be inviting a surrounded/siege situation. You may not even have enough force to defend the city, even if you occupy it.
Plus factor in this unknown: Russian solution to the problem of a defended large city may now to simply be to bombard it and starve it out, rather than fight house to house. So, that option may result in the razing of your city to the ground.
Tough choices.
IMHO, Russia is settling in for a long war. IMHO, they cn risk deploying ALL of their armed forces against Ukraine because the USA is no threat at all to intervene. Nobody in the West is going to honor that guarantee to defend Ukraine and the Ukes were very foolish to believe that promise.
If you decline to defend your large urban city, you maintain the ability to maneuver. If you defend your city, you may be inviting a surrounded/siege situation. You may not even have enough force to defend the city, even if you occupy it.
Plus factor in this unknown: Russian solution to the problem of a defended large city may now to simply be to bombard it and starve it out, rather than fight house to house. So, that option may result in the razing of your city to the ground.
Tough choices.
IMHO, Russia is settling in for a long war. IMHO, they cn risk deploying ALL of their armed forces against Ukraine because the USA is no threat at all to intervene. Nobody in the West is going to honor that guarantee to defend Ukraine and the Ukes were very foolish to believe that promise.
This post was edited on 3/8/22 at 9:02 am
Posted on 3/8/22 at 9:02 am to cypher
Anyone recall any estimates of how many tanks Russia had pre-staged for this war?
Posted on 3/8/22 at 9:03 am to Champagne
quote:
IMHO, Russia is settling in for a long war. IMHO, they cn risk deploying ALL of their armed forces against Ukraine because the USA is no threat at all to intervene.
Can Russia afford to do that?
Posted on 3/8/22 at 9:03 am to WDE24
Read a pretty sad story about people that live in Ukraine who are trying to tell their loved ones in Russia what's happening and can't break through the decades of propaganda that has brainwashed them.
LINK
quote:
"When I heard the first explosions, I ran out of the house to get my dogs from their enclosures outside. People were panicking, abandoning their cars. I was so scared," she says.
The 25-year-old has been speaking regularly to her mother, who lives in Moscow. But in these conversations, and even after sending videos from her heavily bombarded hometown, Oleksandra is unable to convince her mother about the danger she is in.
"I didn't want to scare my parents, but I started telling them directly that civilians and children are dying," she says.
"But even though they worry about me, they still say it probably happens only by accident, that the Russian army would never target civilians. That it's Ukrainians who're killing their own people."
Oleksandra says her mother just repeats the narratives of what she hears on Russian state TV channels.
"It really scared me when my mum exactly quoted Russian TV. They are just brainwashing people. And people trust them," says Oleksandra.
"My parents understand that some military action is happening here. But they say: 'Russians came to liberate you. They won't ruin anything, they won't touch you. They're only targeting military bases'."
quote:
Mykhailo said he felt he knew the power of Russian propaganda, but when he heard it from his father, he was devastated.
"My own father does not believe me, knowing that I'm here and see everything with my own eyes. And my mum, his ex-wife, is going through this too," he says.
"She is hiding with my grandmother in the bathroom, because of the bombardment."
quote:
So when on 24 February, Anastasiya woke up in Kyiv to the sound of sirens, she knew how her parents would react.
'My mum was the first person I called when I jumped out of bed at five, disoriented. She was surprised I called and sounded really calm, almost casual," she says.
Anastasiya, a BBC Ukrainian correspondent who moved to Kyiv 10 years ago, heard bombs exploding after waking and was worried about where would be hit next.
"I called my mum again. I told her I was scared. 'Don't worry', she said, reassuringly. 'They [Russia] will never bomb Kyiv'."
But they are already doing it, Anastasiya replied.
"I told her there were casualties among civilians. 'But that's what we had too when Ukraine attacked Donbas!', she said, laughing. For a moment I couldn't breathe. Hearing my mum say this with such cruelty just broke my heart."
"There are a lot of thoughts in my head now. What will happen to us all? Where is this going? Will I ever come back? Will I ever see my parents again? I still love them deeply, but something inside me has broken and I don't think it can ever be fixed."
LINK
This post was edited on 3/8/22 at 9:05 am
Posted on 3/8/22 at 9:04 am to Dr RC
The BBC doing work on you comrade 
Posted on 3/8/22 at 9:05 am to SDVTiger
m'kay
stay in denial brah.
Posted on 3/8/22 at 9:06 am to WDE24
And 1 more
quote:
It is the second week of war in Eastern Europe. The Russians have been making no appreciable gains in the north where their logistics train remains snarled up. They are in the process of changing tactics to cope with the insurgency they so blandly dismissed. Unfortunately that means more indiscriminate artillery and air strikes. We are seeing terrible news coming out of the warzone of families being killed wholesale by casual Russian barbarity. There are images I never want to see again, but I probably will because all war is hell... and this one is no exception. To appreciate the full scope of the human tragedy I am witnessing, I have to face the elephant that is war's brutal reality.
There are an estimated 1.5m refugees from this war so far. Ukrainian cities in the warzone are depopulating, while brave Ukrainian men are moving in to fortify them. They are forcing Putin to spend every ounce of Russian blood to triumph. Russian casualty estimates vary from 4,000 KIA to 11,000 KIA. Either number is remarkable for just a couple days of war. The Ukrainians are doing their part for the free world. They are sending Russians home in body bags by the bushel. The Russians are also beginning to lose officers with Ukrainian special ops killing the Russian deputy commander of the 41st Army.
Hacker group Anonymous has been hacking into Russian media and posting images and videos of the war... bombed out buildings, weeping civilians, dejected Russian captives, destroyed Russian equipment. Russia is losing the cyber and information war badly. It seems like Ukrainian drones are beginning to reap a fruitful harvest. Turkish military cargo aircraft landing in Poland are presumed to be supplying the Ukrainians with Turkey's wildly successful TB2 Barayktar drones. They are hitting fuel trucks, surface-to-air missile systems and artillery emplacements. The snarled up convoy NW if Kyiv is still there, and the Ukrainians seem to be muscling in on the enemy rear. The fighting west and northwest of Kyiv is extremely fluid with Ukrainian territorial defense and special ops regularly penetrating the enemy's security barriers, such as they are.
In the South the Russians continue to make gains, though more slowly. Several key cities continue to hold out, notably Mariupol which remains under siege and bombardment. Until Mariupol is taken, the Russian advance will continue only slowly in the south. The Chernihiv and Sumy pockets have been holding out since day one, threatening the long, thin Russian advances towards Kyiv from the east. Zelensky is still broadcasting in the clear from Kyiv, rallying his people and inciting his soldiers to superhuman efforts in defending their nation. This war has its Churchill as well as its Hitler.
Expect the ground and air war to continue intensifying. More bombed out buildings, more streams of refugees, more horrific reports of families destroyed. Find it in your heart to provide succor and relief to the Ukrainian people. They are on the front lines defending the freedoms all people cherish the world over... especially the freedom from fear.
Posted on 3/8/22 at 9:08 am to Dr RC
I believe in the Ghost of Kiev bruh
Posted on 3/8/22 at 9:08 am to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
Can Russia afford to do that?
My best guess is: Yes. Russia is at war with only Ukraine and there is no threat of any nation intervening to help Ukraine. None.
Ukraine cannot defeat Russia in a one-on-one war.
Posted on 3/8/22 at 9:09 am to Champagne
quote:
The only persons who can make that call are those right there on the ground. From where we sit, we don't have enough info to make the call.
Right, I understand that. Just taking an average of a few of the maps out there at face value as being accurate and focusing on a couple of the larger cities yet to be controlled by the Russians. I was just wondering what strategy would go into those decisions.
quote:
If you decline to defend your large urban city, you maintain the ability to maneuver. If you defend your city, you may be inviting a surrounded/siege situation. You may not even have enough force to defend the city, even if you occupy it.
Agreed.
Say the Ukrainians did decide to fall back to the capital, would they do a fighting retreat or just make a run for it and get defenses in place? Which would decrease their chances of being cut off?
Could the entire force get to Kyiv then fall back west to somewhere east of Lyiv and hopefully get more supplies from western nations to make a counter attack eastward?
They've put up a hell of a fight so far, but it is looking the the inevitable is closing in and they're running out of options.
Posted on 3/8/22 at 9:11 am to Decatur
Posted on 3/8/22 at 9:12 am to Champagne
quote:
My best guess is: Yes. Russia is at war with only Ukraine and there is no threat of any nation intervening to help Ukraine. None. Ukraine cannot defeat Russia in a one-on-one war.
I mean financially. Russia’s economy right now is in the gutter and is getting substantially worse by the day.
Posted on 3/8/22 at 9:13 am to SDVTiger
Russian oligarchs donated to … gasp, the Clinton Foundation!
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2022/03/07/russian-oligarchs-donate-american-charities/
Can’t wait to see how the PB spins this one
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2022/03/07/russian-oligarchs-donate-american-charities/
quote:
Viktor Vekselberg, an energy tycoon aligned with the Kremlin, who has donated more than $100,000 in his own name or through his company to an array of groups, including the Clinton Foundation, the Museum of Modern Art and MIT,
Can’t wait to see how the PB spins this one
This post was edited on 3/8/22 at 9:14 am
Posted on 3/8/22 at 9:14 am to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
Can Russia afford to do that?
Fwiw from what I’m seeing from people that know much more about all of this stuff than I do is that the timeline for Russia to do something without inviting real difficulty is more in the weeks and months range than years range.
Posted on 3/8/22 at 9:15 am to IAmNERD
quote:
Say the Ukrainians did decide to fall back to the capital, would they do a fighting retreat or just make a run for it and get defenses in place? Which would decrease their chances of being cut off?
Could the entire force get to Kyiv then fall back west to somewhere east of Lyiv and hopefully get more supplies from western nations to make a counter attack eastward?
The more detailed the questions become, the more unknown factors you introduce into the equation. There's no way to know the answer to your question right now. All we can do is take a wild guess, and your wild guess is as good as mine.
Popular
Back to top



1









