Started By
Message

re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Posted on 3/13/24 at 9:59 am to
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
45701 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 9:59 am to
quote:

Democrats have 213 representatives in the House so we need only 5 GOP members. The "Squad" won't sign, so it will need about 10 GOP signatures. I think that Republican members who support Ukraine will give the Speaker at least another week to negotiate a deal. At this point, though, I am increasingly skeptical that a deal can be constructed that would get the support of a majority of the conference and also get the Democratic votes to pass. In the end, I think that the question is going to come down to whether there are 10 GOP members willing to buck the Speaker and vote for the petition.


I spoke with my cousin who is an aid for Steve Scalise and she said that the votes are there. However, they are holding back for a little while longer to see if Johnson and Biden can come to a deal. Johnson supposedly liked the idea of turning it into a loan but they haven’t reached out to the WH as of last night.
Posted by Mr Breeze
The Lunatic Fringe
Member since Dec 2010
6806 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 10:01 am to
quote:

Can someone tell me again why we are pissing money away while our own border is invaded?


quote:

What makes you think the GOP would take money for Ukraine & divert it to the border?

Don't be fooled



Chip Roy quote on X March 12th, 2024: "In 2018 we had the House, we had the Senate, we had The White House and we had a bigger majority than we have today and we utterly failed to secure the border. Totally dropped the ball. Didn’t do it."

Chip Roy

Donald Trump campaign promise June 16th, 2015

"I would build a great wall, and nobody builds walls better than me, believe me, and I’ll build them very inexpensively. I will build a great great wall on our southern border and I’ll have Mexico pay for that wall."

We can support Ukraine and close the Border at the same time. It's easy, like walking and chewing gum simultaneously. Try it some time, Republicans and Democrats.
Posted by RuLSU
Chicago, IL
Member since Nov 2007
8131 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 10:53 am to


Sure, Ukraine lost. Again.

France is only talking about sending troops because they don't want Russia trying to take Transnistria. It's just Move:Counter-move geopolitical posturing.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42751 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 11:11 am to
quote:

The people who do vote for him care about ukraine and hamas more than our own country.

8- million idiots voted for him knowing he wasn’t going to police the border.

Anyone with half of a brain knows that if there was no Ukraine war this administration wasn’t going to protect the border.

You people need to understand this, the lack of money isn’t the reason the border is wide open. It’s a lack of will not a lack of dollar bills.
Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
8423 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 11:13 am to
quote:

We can support Ukraine and close the Border at the same time


Sure, but I don't want to support Ukraine. And we shouldn't.
Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
8423 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 11:16 am to
quote:

Anyone with half of a brain knows that if there was no Ukraine war this administration wasn’t going to protect the border.

You people need to understand this, the lack of money isn’t the reason the border is wide open. It’s a lack of will not a lack of dollar bills.


And you need to understand that its the perception (and reality) of letting the border run rampant while also having all this time, money, and energy for Ukraine. Most reasonable people don't actually expect them to take money appropriated for Ukraine and directly use those same funds for the border. Its the optics of trying to save one country that even the most robotic of all the Ukraine bots on here don't actually care about vs letting ours be destroyed.

But you could play that game with anything: infrastructure, homelessness, funding our own military, Israel if thats your perogative, etc.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42751 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 11:17 am to
quote:

Sure, but I don't want to support Ukraine. And we shouldn't.


Understood, many are acting if helping Ukraine is preventing us from policing the border and it’s not.
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
21027 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 11:26 am to
Yeah, it's like the old man screaming about how stupid the young people are wasting money on expensive coffee when they have big car payments. If the coffee patron skips the coffee one day, it likely does not mean that they will pay down their car note.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
105473 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 11:32 am to
quote:

The reports also highlight "the inadequacy of the training of Ukrainian soldiers and officers": due to a lack of officers and a significant number of veterans, these "Year II soldiers" from Ukraine - often trained for "no more than three weeks" - were launched into an assault on a Russian fortification line that proved impregnable.


You can say the exact same thing about the Russian Army, in spades. These are two not very good armies fighting each other. Russia has a manpower advantage but that's about all, and whether that by itself is enough to be decisive is yet to be proven.

Realistically Ukraine was never going to take back all the territory it lost since 2014. What it can do is make the internal and external costs of the war so intolerable that Russia can't continue to prosecute it. Russia is not a stable country under the best circumstances and the war has stressed it economically, politically and socially.

Keep in mind also that much or Ukraine's recent problems on the ground are the result of western dithering. With sufficient Ukrainian artillery ammunition, the Russian winter/spring offensive would have looked much different. Even so, Russia took horrific casualties to gain a few kilometers and still didn't achieve a breakthrough.

And things aren't going so great for Russia, either. The Black Sea Fleet is confined to its secure bases for the most part, the Russian air force is losing irreplaceable strategic assets every day, and keeping open the logistics routes to Crimea is getting increasingly difficult.
Posted by cypher
Member since Sep 2014
5727 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 11:33 am to
had to post, best headline today (so far)

Russia awakes to biggest attack on Russian soil since World War II
March 13, 2024, 05:55 AM

The biggest attack on Russian soil since the Second World War continues as waves of attack drones continue to fall on Russian oil refineries, military bases, and security services for a second straight day.

At least 60 drones were spotted over not less than seven Russian regions overnight on March 13, with at least seven more in a morning wave, Russia’s Defense Ministry announced.

The New Voice of Ukraine
Posted by SirWinston
Say NO to War
Member since Jul 2014
104464 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 12:12 pm to
"A vote for Trump is a vote for Putin!"


Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
8423 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 12:16 pm to
Should be a huge red flag when Killary agrees with you
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
20240 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

You don’t seriously believe that if we weren’t providing Ukraine with aid that Biden would be using that money to maintain border control? You can’t be that dumb?


Well nevermind….. you don’t need to answer.



Some of you are so ignorant about common sense issues. Do you think he marks 100s and says this was for Ukraine but we will spend on the border????

Now do I think the multitrillion dollar budget could be configured to spend money on US interests, in the US, of which one is the border, yes I do. And it is a budget, and every dollar spent in Ukraine could be spend in the US, not this nonsense.
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
20240 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

You people need to understand this, the lack of money isn’t the reason the border is wide open. It’s a lack of will not a lack of dollar bills.


You are one thick individual. No one believes not funding ukraine means the US gets its border back. It was talked about, put in the bill as an "analogy" funding ukraine's border and not ours.

DC has not had a budget it adherred to in the past century
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42751 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

Some of you are so ignorant about common sense issues. Do you think he marks 100s and says this was for Ukraine but we will spend on the border????
Now do I think the multitrillion dollar budget could be configured to spend money on US interests, in the US, of which one is the border, yes I do. And it is a budget, and every dollar spent in Ukraine could be spend in the US, not this nonsense.


You can’t say that because every dollar we spend now (excluding on Ukraine) is not spent in the US.

When you tie Ukraine into the border problem all you do is give Biden and hud people cover. You are telling people that the reason the border is unsecured is Ukraine when the real reason it’s unsecured is Joe Biden and the Democrats.

But go ahead and give Biden an excuse. Go ahead and blame the “RINOs”. That really will help secure the border.

I have beat this drum over and over again. The border issue should stand by itself. There is no either or. You secure the border to maintain public safety and order no matter what.

Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
16111 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

DC has not had a budget it adherred to in the past century


I'm going to go with since founded instead.

Cut a lot of social programs enacted in the 1960's and viola, regardless of level of military and foreign aide spending.

Cut a lot of professional memo writer bureaucrats along with those programs, that is the real swamp protecting its survival
Posted by AU86
Member since Aug 2009
26257 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 2:58 pm to
Frick Hillary and Frick Biden.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
105473 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 3:17 pm to
Macron just made a speech to the French parliament. I don't parlez vous, but it sounded bellicose.
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87529 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 3:23 pm to
I tend to agree. Biden isn't choosing Ukraine over the border, at least directly. He's prioritizing Ukraine over the border in the sense that he wants to spend money on the former and isn't motivated to do anything on the latter. But it's not a binary one-over-the-other election.

But I do think there is merit in pointing out that many of our politicians seem more motivated to fund Ukraine's war than do the hard work here. I think that's fair even if it's simplistic.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42751 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

But I do think there is merit in pointing out that many of our politicians seem more motivated to fund Ukraine's war than do the hard work here. I think that's fair even if it's simplistic.


I think it fair to discuss expenses that are apples to apples.

Aid Ukraine or aid another nation?

Secure the border or don’t secure the border is the question at hand.

If we stopped aiding Ukraine today Biden would not spend a penny more on the border. We know that and that should be front and center.
first pageprev pagePage 3577 of 5046Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram