Started By
Message

re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Posted on 7/21/23 at 11:48 am to
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
21027 posts
Posted on 7/21/23 at 11:48 am to
quote:

A Moscow court has ruled that Igor Girkin/Strelkov remain in pre-trial detention at least until 18 September.


Posted by Tigeralum2008
Yankees Fan
Member since Apr 2012
17727 posts
Posted on 7/21/23 at 12:17 pm to
Airborne Infantry just got a huge justification for their existence. Land the Ukrainian equivalent to the 82nd or 101st behind enemy lines and have them cause havoc


Also: could cluster munitions and decoy drones work? Building a cheap robot with the magnetic signature of a tank seems feasible these days
Posted by Chromdome35
Fast lane, behind a slow driver
Member since Nov 2010
8182 posts
Posted on 7/21/23 at 12:18 pm to
He provided a good pulse on goings on from the Russian side. He will be missed as a source.
Posted by Chromdome35
Fast lane, behind a slow driver
Member since Nov 2010
8182 posts
Posted on 7/21/23 at 12:22 pm to
What Ukraine needs more than anything is air superiority. I can't envision a scenario where they could achieve that.

I really thought they could compensate for the lack of close air support by using drones. That has certainly helped them but it hasn't been as decisive as I expected.

Posted by StormyMcMan
USA
Member since Oct 2016
4691 posts
Posted on 7/21/23 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

Putin: “Western part of Poland is gift of Stalin to the country, Poland forgot about it, we will remind them”

LINK

quote:

??South Africa's Justice Ministry has requested an arrest warrant for Putin from the Director of Public Prosecutions (NDPP) Shamile Batohi, – News24.

"This comes more than two months after South Africa's Department of International Relations and Cooperation sent its justice colleagues the ICC warrant", – the newspaper writes.

LINK

quote:

??russian media reported on the detention of Girkin's associate Pavel Gubarev.

The crowd chants "shame" to the police officers involved in the detention.

LINK
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 7/21/23 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

Airborne Infantry just got a huge justification for their existence. Land the Ukrainian equivalent to the 82nd or 101st behind enemy lines and have them cause havoc


I’d be surprised if a single soldier made it to the drop zone alive in todays environment. Low level static line assaults should’ve gone by the wayside 50 years ago. Helicopter air assault in a contested environment is probably a no go as well. We saw how it worked out for the Russians in Kiev.
Posted by jfan244888
Soda City, SC
Member since Jul 2021
1166 posts
Posted on 7/21/23 at 1:09 pm to
Poland's response to Putin

"Please try us"
Posted by Hateradedrink
Member since May 2023
4156 posts
Posted on 7/21/23 at 1:18 pm to
Honestly, if this war has shown us anything, it’s that warfare on the current battlefield is almost completely pointless without massive superiority.





This post was edited on 7/21/23 at 1:19 pm
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
16112 posts
Posted on 7/21/23 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

Honestly, if this war has shown us anything, it’s that warfare on the current battlefield is almost completely pointless without massive superiority.


Unless sending wave upon wave of Chinese like in Korea, this has been known since WWII. Air superiority is how conventional armies win decisively
Posted by Hateradedrink
Member since May 2023
4156 posts
Posted on 7/21/23 at 1:23 pm to
Yeah but it’s at a different level now. Even air assets that are “superior” aren’t “superior enough”.

Russia, by all accounts, should be steamrolling a country that basically has no Air Force.
Posted by LSUPilot07
Member since Feb 2022
8657 posts
Posted on 7/21/23 at 1:34 pm to
Airborne infantry would get slaughtered and that’s the ones that even make it out of the aircraft. With all the SAMs covering the lines a transport aircraft which would have to fly relatively low and slow for guys to jump would be fish in a barrel. The ones that would make it to the ground would be lightly armed with no heavy weapons and no hope of Ukrainian units breaking through to them in time. It worked for the 101st on D-day because by the end of the first day we had established a beachhead and had armor landing on the beaches to support them. Totally different scenario in Ukraine.
Posted by LSUPilot07
Member since Feb 2022
8657 posts
Posted on 7/21/23 at 1:38 pm to
They will never have air superiority either. Even if they get 60 f-16s the best they would be able to do would be cause a stalemate in the air which would be a big victory for Ukraine.
This post was edited on 7/21/23 at 1:40 pm
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 7/21/23 at 2:09 pm to
Airborne infantry was basically a disaster in WWII as well.
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
21027 posts
Posted on 7/21/23 at 2:13 pm to
The NY Times is taking a lot of heat online for this headline, since Girkin is a convicted war criminal, wanted in The Hague for shooting down a commercial airplane.




The criticism is legit, but headline writers write headlines quickly, and it's often that not a lot of thought goes into them.
Posted by TigerFanatic99
South Bend, Indiana
Member since Jan 2007
36220 posts
Posted on 7/21/23 at 2:20 pm to
What is there to criticize about the headline? It's not glorifying Girkin, just stating a relevant fact in a relatively objective tone.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
105473 posts
Posted on 7/21/23 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

Airborne infantry was basically a disaster in WWII as well.


The Germans got shot to pieces in Crete, and Arnhem was a shitshow. But they were successf in North Africa and Sicily. And even in Normandy despite the plan going to hell. Macarthur used airborne troops effectively in the Pacific, which almost no one knows about. But to employ them today you would need total air supremacy. And if you have that you probably don't need them anyway.
Posted by IAmNERD
Member since May 2017
24345 posts
Posted on 7/21/23 at 2:25 pm to
If you only read the headline and then Google Girkin with no background of his past, I can see where the NYT could be seen as maybe glossing over his past to make him seem like some anti-Kremlin, pro-western voice inside Russia.

Which that couldn't be further from reality. But since they didn't bash him in their headline, they will be seen as "sympathetic" to him since they're focusing in his tension with the MoD and Kremlin lately.
This post was edited on 7/21/23 at 2:26 pm
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42751 posts
Posted on 7/21/23 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

Airborne infantry was basically a disaster in WWII as well.


Airborne Infantry did very well in the Normandy invasion.
They took key positions and held them until the cavalry arrived.
This post was edited on 7/21/23 at 4:04 pm
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
16112 posts
Posted on 7/21/23 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

Airborne Infantry did very in the Normandy invasion.
They took key positions and held them until the cavalry arrived.


This was due quantity of them, two divisions worth
Posted by LSUPilot07
Member since Feb 2022
8657 posts
Posted on 7/21/23 at 3:27 pm to
It was actually a bit of a shitshow with them being dropped all over the countryside miles from their objectives. Units were all mixed together where they landed but they were well trained and there were a lot of them which helped tremendously. Also the Germans for the most part were focused on beaches come dawn when naval guns opened up and aircraft started their attacks.
This post was edited on 7/21/23 at 3:28 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3067 of 5046Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram