- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Posted on 5/22/23 at 3:37 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
Posted on 5/22/23 at 3:37 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
The war in Ukraine isn’t even important. It’s a fricking sideshow that should be dealt with second tier sideshow countries like Western Europe.
directly you are correct. indirectly, China has seen the resolve of the west. china has seen new commitments to ramp up defense GDP. China has been watching the west's reaction to Russia to weigh a potential response to china making o move on Taiwan.
So indirectly the west standing firm on Russia is forcing china to rethink the risk/reward outcome of attacking Taiwan
This is why the west must stand up to Russia, showing that in the 21st century aggression for adding land is not acceptaple in the geopolitical realm
Posted on 5/22/23 at 3:44 pm to tigeraddict
So we’ve had enough fun with the politards the last few days. Any chance we can get back to this being a Ukraine/Russia war update thread?
Posted on 5/22/23 at 3:45 pm to tigeraddict
And again, people fundamentally fail to grasp that we are in an alliance of nations, some of whom care very deeply about what is happening in Ukraine
Our involvement absolutely matters to our NATO and non NATO allies. And that's important
Our involvement absolutely matters to our NATO and non NATO allies. And that's important
Posted on 5/22/23 at 3:45 pm to tigeraddict
quote:
directly you are correct. indirectly, China has seen the resolve of the west. china has seen new commitments to ramp up defense GDP. China has been watching the west's reaction to Russia to weigh a potential response to china making o move on Taiwan. So indirectly the west standing firm on Russia is forcing china to rethink the risk/reward outcome of attacking Taiwan
There’s zero evidence of this actually happening. It may or may not be happening but for the most part it’s just wishful thinking. More than likely China looks at Ukraine exactly as I do, an interesting little geopolitical event happening on the other side of the world. China is much more interested in how it can leverage Russian than it is in how the West responds. They certainly don’t give a shot what Europe is doing because it’s not like Europe will be doing anything in the event that China does invade Taiwan. It’ll be the US, South Korea and Japan fighting that one….mayyyyybe Australia will pitch in. If anything China is just getting a whole bunch of operational intel on our weapons systems, which if we’re being honest is the real reason Ukraine isn’t getting ATACMS. I’m surprised they’re getting our best Patriot air defense systems to be honest. But they certainly won’t be seeing any THAAD missiles.
Posted on 5/22/23 at 3:47 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
And again, people fundamentally fail to grasp that we are in an alliance of nations, some of whom care very deeply about what is happening in Ukraine Our involvement absolutely matters to our NATO and non NATO allies. And that's important
Oh I get it. I think we should’ve gotten out of NATO at least 25 years ago. That way we wouldn’t have to care what all those losers in Europe give a shite about.
Posted on 5/22/23 at 3:48 pm to kingbob
quote:
The Japanese would have had no need to invade the Dutch Indies if
NARRATOR: In truth, the Japanese did not need to invade any of their neighbors.
Posted on 5/22/23 at 3:50 pm to notiger1997
quote:
So we’ve had enough fun with the politards the last few days. Any chance we can get back to this being an Ukraine/Russia war update thread?
Been quiet on news here for Belgorod.oblast from this morning. But I would imagine confirmable news will lag 24/48 hours behind actual events. I have see reports of 1 or 2 Russian hello’s shot down but until verified I would wait till visual confirmations.
It’s night on that side the world so likely nothing new till tomorrow
Posted on 5/22/23 at 3:50 pm to doubleb
quote:
So you admit the Japanese were warlike and aggressive; yet if we and the other western nations would have left them alone they would not have attacked anyone but China?
Who would argue Japan wasn’t aggressive in 1941? Their war was against China. Look where Japan’s resources were spent in WWII.
In my opinion, Japan’s expansion in the Pacific outside of China and Korea was based entirely on securing necessary resources to continue their conquest of China. Japan needed rubber and oil from the Dutch Indies and Phillipines, and the Dutch, English, and Americans weren’t trading. The American navy was the only real military force in the region that could stop them from taking the resources that they couldn’t trade for. Japan would not have wasted the manpower occupying those islands to get those resources if they were being traded to them. China was their main focus.
Assuming Japan could have eventually subdued China with access to those resources, I feel like Japan then would have turned on the allies and conquered those colonies.
War was inevitable, but it did not need happen in 1941. It happening in 1941 was the best thing ever to the U.S. and it saved Mao and future Communist China.
Posted on 5/22/23 at 3:55 pm to kingbob
quote:
Assuming Japan could have eventually subdued China with access to those resources, I feel like Japan then would have turned on the allies and conquered those colonies.
Yes, and by then Japan likely would have grown stronger if they had waited.
Posted on 5/22/23 at 4:01 pm to tigeraddict
quote:
Been quiet on news here for Belgorod.oblast from this morning. But I would imagine confirmable news will lag 24/48 hours behind actual events. I have see reports of 1 or 2 Russian hello’s shot down but until verified I would wait till visual confirmations.
I saw what appeared to be confirmation of one Russian helicopter down. The Russians are saying that all of the "separatists" have been "liquidated," except for five that were captured, but there is no verification for any of those reports. They said that last time and the little green men all got away, so who knows.
This has certainly been an interesting day.
Posted on 5/22/23 at 4:04 pm to TBoy
A little off topic but juicy post by the Kiev Independent:
quote:
Kremlin propagandist Vladimir Solovyov's mistress owns a villa next to members of the Russian military elite in the Black Sea resort of Sochi and gave birth to her children in the U.S., Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny's team reported on May 22.
Posted on 5/22/23 at 4:12 pm to doubleb
12 NATO states discuss strengthening eastern flank and Ukraine's defence capability
European Pravda — Monday, 22 May 2023, 21:24
Defence ministers and senior defence officials from 12 NATO member states met in Poland on Monday, 22 May, to discuss Ukraine’s defence capability and strengthening security on the Alliance’s eastern flank, ahead of NATO’s July summit in Vilnius, Lithuania.
Source: Associated Press
Details: Defence officials met at military facilities in Legionowo, near Warsaw, as part of the so-called Northern Group, a platform concerned with developing security initiatives for NATO and the European Union. Finland participated for the first time since joining NATO.
The Northern Group was initiated in 2010 by the UK, and includes the Netherlands, Germany, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Poland, and the three Baltic States (Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia).
European Pravda — Monday, 22 May 2023, 21:24
Defence ministers and senior defence officials from 12 NATO member states met in Poland on Monday, 22 May, to discuss Ukraine’s defence capability and strengthening security on the Alliance’s eastern flank, ahead of NATO’s July summit in Vilnius, Lithuania.
Source: Associated Press
Details: Defence officials met at military facilities in Legionowo, near Warsaw, as part of the so-called Northern Group, a platform concerned with developing security initiatives for NATO and the European Union. Finland participated for the first time since joining NATO.
The Northern Group was initiated in 2010 by the UK, and includes the Netherlands, Germany, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Poland, and the three Baltic States (Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia).
Posted on 5/22/23 at 4:19 pm to GOP_Tiger
quote:
Once they defeated China
The Japanese economy was on the verge of collapse without oil, and their war with China would have had to be abandoned for lack of military supplies.
We can say that Japan had no reason to already be at war with China.
In my opinion, Japan never would have defeated China. They would have kept slaughtering civilians, but continued to fail to hold the country side.
Posted on 5/22/23 at 4:22 pm to kingbob
quote:
Japan never would have defeated China
Factual statement.
Japan's war was never winnable. It was somehow less winnable than Germany's war.
Both nations made ridiculously horrible (even contemporaneously horrible) assumptions about their adversaries based on political ideology/politically preferred outcomes as opposed to any type of military feasibility.
Posted on 5/22/23 at 4:27 pm to Indefatigable
Meanwhile, in Krasnodar (Southern Russia) Lenin got some new TV makeup and a sign that says Killer of the Russian people.


Posted on 5/22/23 at 4:33 pm to Obtuse1
Explosions reported in downtown Belgorod. Three UAVs kit FSB offices in Kursk.
Posted on 5/22/23 at 4:40 pm to CitizenK
Russia got less then 24 hours to savor their "Victory" in Bakhmut before Ukraine turned their celebration in Ukraine to an embarrassment at home
Posted on 5/22/23 at 4:47 pm to Chromdome35
Chromedome35 said:
Thanks for coming back with this.
Seems to be very little change between the before two images, there are several sites that are somewhat obscured because of seasonal foliage making it hard to say definitively but they don't appear to change much. The only major difference I could observe between the images is marked below in red. From what I can see on the aftermath shot this was not hit either, nor were most of the other obscured sites.
Is there a wider shot of the surrounding area to show there wasn't anything built up outside the newer shot in terms of defences?
Original
New
Aftermath
quote:
Well it took a few days, but I finally got a recent satellite image of the site that hit outside of Khmelnytskyi. This was the site of the massive explosion a little over a week ago.
To recap, Russia says they hit a major Ukraine weapon storage site. The site is actually known as the "Hrechany demilitarization site" It is a repository of old soviet weapons and land mines waiting for disposal.
Thanks for coming back with this.
Seems to be very little change between the before two images, there are several sites that are somewhat obscured because of seasonal foliage making it hard to say definitively but they don't appear to change much. The only major difference I could observe between the images is marked below in red. From what I can see on the aftermath shot this was not hit either, nor were most of the other obscured sites.
Is there a wider shot of the surrounding area to show there wasn't anything built up outside the newer shot in terms of defences?
Original
New
Aftermath
Posted on 5/22/23 at 4:53 pm to TigersnJeeps
TigersnJeeps said:
While not conclusive that there wasn't anything new stored in them it is reasonable to conclude from Chrome's image that it is extremely unlikely that $500,000,000 of munitions (primarily DU shells) was stored here, as was widely claimed via Pro-Russian sources (I also saw billions mentioned a few times).
Reasons pointing toward this:
Critically there are no signs of traffic on the roadways which appear to be dirt, especially given it has just been mud season. With the size of the initial explosions if it was new munitions there should be some signs of transit, such as truck turning points.
There are no signs of enhanced security or defence structures around the site - I realise that this could have been part of the "show" to hide it but I find it highly unlikely that such a significant store would be left unprotected by ground security to deter the locals or air defences to prevent what happened.
The lack of corroborative evidence showing said munitions being stored, moved there, or any large operation to obscure such transit. If Russia had confirmed intelligence of such they would definitely have put it out for consumption. The only evidence I have seen promulgated by Russian sources is of the explosions themselves and false claims about "dangerous" rises in background radiation in nearby areas meaning DU munitions were destroyed.
Lastly is something I haven't seen discussed much which is logistics. Khmelnytskyi only has one major road and one rail line (leading to Odessa) going through it which would make movement in and out of there both predictable and easy to interdict. While such tactical errors are not unknown in this war from either side I see it as highly unlikely that Ukraine would have come up with such a convoluted plan to hide a large stock of ammunition in an area that is well known to Russians and not the most accessible to the actual front.
quote:
Could not have more modern munitions have been stored in the structures, particularly if some of the old contents have already been destroyed/de-militarized? I don't know if they have but to assume that no change in the external view also means the contents are unchanged seems a bit of a stretch.
While not conclusive that there wasn't anything new stored in them it is reasonable to conclude from Chrome's image that it is extremely unlikely that $500,000,000 of munitions (primarily DU shells) was stored here, as was widely claimed via Pro-Russian sources (I also saw billions mentioned a few times).
Reasons pointing toward this:
Critically there are no signs of traffic on the roadways which appear to be dirt, especially given it has just been mud season. With the size of the initial explosions if it was new munitions there should be some signs of transit, such as truck turning points.
There are no signs of enhanced security or defence structures around the site - I realise that this could have been part of the "show" to hide it but I find it highly unlikely that such a significant store would be left unprotected by ground security to deter the locals or air defences to prevent what happened.
The lack of corroborative evidence showing said munitions being stored, moved there, or any large operation to obscure such transit. If Russia had confirmed intelligence of such they would definitely have put it out for consumption. The only evidence I have seen promulgated by Russian sources is of the explosions themselves and false claims about "dangerous" rises in background radiation in nearby areas meaning DU munitions were destroyed.
Lastly is something I haven't seen discussed much which is logistics. Khmelnytskyi only has one major road and one rail line (leading to Odessa) going through it which would make movement in and out of there both predictable and easy to interdict. While such tactical errors are not unknown in this war from either side I see it as highly unlikely that Ukraine would have come up with such a convoluted plan to hide a large stock of ammunition in an area that is well known to Russians and not the most accessible to the actual front.
Popular
Back to top


3





