- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:03 am to jimmy the leg
Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:03 am to jimmy the leg
Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:13 am to Stidham8
Two things:
1. Your link is behind a pay wall.
2. Biden isn’t mentioned at all.
1. Your link is behind a pay wall.
2. Biden isn’t mentioned at all.
Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:17 am to Stidham8
quote:
While the dismissal of the prosecutor, Iryna Venediktova, surprised some analysts, the ouster of the security chief, Ivan Bakanov, had been forecast for some time. The Security Service of Ukraine, or SBU, has for years faced allegations that its ranks are infiltrated by Russian assets, claims bolstered by two recent high profile arrests
From your own sourcing. Literally the second paragraph. But I bet you would rather he kept Russian assets in his govt.
Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:33 am to DabosDynasty
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/14/26 at 6:46 pm
Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:47 am to DabosDynasty
quote:
quote:While the dismissal of the prosecutor, Iryna Venediktova, surprised some analysts, the ouster of the security chief, Ivan Bakanov, had been forecast for some time. The Security Service of Ukraine, or SBU, has for years faced allegations that its ranks are infiltrated by Russian assets, claims bolstered by two recent high profile arrests From your own sourcing. Literally the second paragraph. But I bet you would rather he kept Russian assets in his govt.
Pro Russian/anti Biden people go out of their way to makeZalensky the bad guy, but the bad guy is Putin.
I’m not saying Zalensky is George Washington, but he’s led Ukraine when string leadership was required. He didn’t start the war, Putin did way before Zalensky took office when he invaded Crimea.
Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:48 am to cypher
Range of ATACMS 300 km missiles when fired from Ukraine’s frontline
ATACAMS will be able to hit targets in all of Ukraine even Crimea, most of Belarus, and a significant part of Russia with M270’s and HIMARS
The Crimean Bridge will be in range
#UkraineWar #Ukraine #HIMARS
Twitter ATACMS map
ATACAMS will be able to hit targets in all of Ukraine even Crimea, most of Belarus, and a significant part of Russia with M270’s and HIMARS
The Crimean Bridge will be in range
#UkraineWar #Ukraine #HIMARS
Twitter ATACMS map
This post was edited on 7/18/22 at 8:50 am
Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:49 am to OMLandshark
quote:
How the frick doesn’t he get impeached for that phone call? That’s a hundred times worse than what Trump did.
The swamp is going to swamp.
Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:51 am to doubleb
quote:
people go out of their way to makeZalensky the bad guy
He is “a” bad guy, not “the” bad guy.
quote:
He didn’t start the war, Putin did way before Zalensky took office when he invaded Crimea.
2014 says hello.
Putin is a shitbag.
Zalensky is a shitbag.
Biden is a shitbag.
This isn’t difficult.
Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:52 am to TBoy
I completely get the warnings, but I surely don't remember anything offered other than a free ride to exile offered
Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:52 am to OMLandshark
quote:
. I mean, what the frick. How the frick doesn’t he get impeached for that phone call?
Democrats have tried to impeach every Republican president from Ike on, except Ford. Its what they do, the rest of the world understands this shite happens.
Except the Left.
Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:55 am to jimmy the leg
the drones were boats. He laughed about not having any problem hitting them if they wanted to. I do not recall sort of anti ship missiles they were using.
Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:56 am to jimmy the leg
Twitter analysis of Russian logistics
The analysis down thread is interesting too, where it notes that partisans will have an easier time disrupting logistics behind the lines once Russia is committed to using trucks instead of armored trains. It seems probable that Russia won’t be able to maintain the level of conflict they did the last couple of months as a result of the losses of men and equipment and the longer, less secure supply lines.
quote:
RU forces are moving the train offload points out of HIMARS range, this image gives an indication of how this affects delivery times. The conclusion is the transport times have doubled, so they need twice the amount of trucks to be able to keep up the rate of delivery.
The analysis down thread is interesting too, where it notes that partisans will have an easier time disrupting logistics behind the lines once Russia is committed to using trucks instead of armored trains. It seems probable that Russia won’t be able to maintain the level of conflict they did the last couple of months as a result of the losses of men and equipment and the longer, less secure supply lines.
Posted on 7/18/22 at 9:02 am to DabosDynasty
As if decades haven't enough time for Russian agents to infiltrate. This has been a concern from Day 1.
Posted on 7/18/22 at 9:04 am to Athanatos
quote:
It seems probable that Russia won’t be able to maintain the level of conflict they did the last couple of months
Not without a severe cost associated with it.
That being said, I predict that Russia is gonna Russia. Those supply lines will be a meat grinder, and yet they will still manage.
Posted on 7/18/22 at 9:15 am to DabosDynasty
quote:
From your own sourcing. Literally the second paragraph. But I bet you would rather he kept Russian assets in his govt.
This is similar to the Nazis, paranoid at the end of World War II, arresting people in their own government.
Posted on 7/18/22 at 9:21 am to CitizenK
quote:
the drones were boats. He laughed about not having any problem hitting them if they wanted to. I do not recall sort of anti ship missiles they were using.
We had a tow target for our turrets. The ASROCS were coordinate guided. As for Sea Sparrows, planes would fly by with a target towed behind them (these targets were also used for our Phalanx guns). The Tomahawks were shot at land targets based on coordinates.
All were fairly accurate, but nothing compared to today’s weaponry.
Posted on 7/18/22 at 9:22 am to jimmy the leg
Come on amigo, link?
quote:
Biden was sounding the alarm, publicly saying that Russia was about to invade.
Posted on 7/18/22 at 9:25 am to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
Not that it negates your argument, but he’s still right.
I would suggest he is completely wrong in that he applied the "democracy" argument incorrectly to our constitutional republic..
Another aspect of this is the inevitable temporal nature of everything in life...
Nothing lasts forever...
Posted on 7/18/22 at 9:49 am to jimmy the leg
I’m sure you can find some links via Google. It took me 2 minutes to find Sec. Antony Blinken Twitter from Feb. 17. I don’t do Twitter per se, but his comments were also widely televised at the UN.
quote:
Russia has repeatedly derided our warnings and alarms as melodrama and nonsense, while they have been steadily amassing more than 150,000 troops on Ukraine’s borders, as well as the capabilities to conduct a massive military operation.
Posted on 7/18/22 at 9:51 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
Come on amigo, link?
quote:
Biden was sounding the alarm, publicly saying that Russia was about to invade.
Russia Invasion Warning
Popular
Back to top


3


