- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Posted on 6/12/22 at 9:37 pm to StormyMcMan
Posted on 6/12/22 at 9:37 pm to StormyMcMan
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/22/26 at 8:13 pm
Posted on 6/12/22 at 9:41 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Did I say that? No, I’m asking you to hold their lives to the same standard.
You did though. You are terrified of Ukraine winning this for some reasons which appears to be you think Russia will start nuking everyone. But don't express near the concern/outrage in a Russian victory situation
But you appear to hold Taiwaneese lives above Ukraine/Somalian/Yemen/whatever else you been throwing at the wall to make something stick
This post was edited on 6/12/22 at 9:42 pm
Posted on 6/12/22 at 9:44 pm to OMLandshark
Russia had been arming heavily for several years before even Poland. It was as well armed as Germany when Germany invaded.
Posted on 6/12/22 at 9:50 pm to StormyMcMan
quote:
But just so I understand correctly you're cool with Putin taking over whatever the hell he wants without consquence because you're scared he will use nukes if we do anything?
Why does having concerns about how the US is supporting Ukraine always equate to being “cool with Putin taking over whatever the hell he wants” with contributors on this thread?
Considering what happened with Georgia and Crimea along with Hunter’s enrichment from Ukraine why would anyone trust Biden to handle it correctly and ethically? He didn’t seem overly concerned December and had to follow lead of other European countries in Jan and February. He started to become hawkish in March for some reason, but let’s keep throwing billions to Ukraine including billions above requests (what’s an extra $7 billion above request said Pelosi while later invoking the bible to gain support) and then just watch Hunter implode with coke and hookers from the extra cash. Biden’s favorite died of cancer not the one who helps get the long time govt “servant” rich.
Posted on 6/12/22 at 9:50 pm to StormyMcMan
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/22/26 at 8:13 pm
Posted on 6/12/22 at 10:05 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
What if I’m right this may lead to World War III?
OML said World War 3! Everyone drink!
This post was edited on 6/12/22 at 10:06 pm
Posted on 6/12/22 at 10:08 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
If Russia wins, then they own Ukraine or the Donbas and do atrocities
Not good or
.
quote:
With that said, where are you with the attrocities done to Xinjiang, or Tibet, or Inner Mongolia? Oh right, you’re nowhere to be seen. You only care because this is a European country. Come back to me when you’re as appalled by this as you are in Yemen.
So you want to change the subject because you really have no sound position. It figures.
This post was edited on 6/12/22 at 10:23 pm
Posted on 6/12/22 at 10:10 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
I love asking this to the warmongers, but here is my question yet again: “Where do you think this ends?”
I mean, there are essentially three possible outcomes:
1. Russia eventually takes the entire country, installs a new government, and (probably) faces an insurgency for years to come.
2. The war reaches some type of stalemate with Russia controlling some amount of eastern Ukrainian territory.
3. Ukraine eventually pushes Russia out of the east and reclaims their lost territory.
Which of these outcomes do you think result in full scale nuclear war, and why?
ETA:
quote:
No matter what Ukraine does on its own, it will not result in nuclear war. If we get directly involved though, yeah it might.
Wait, so all of this hand wringing is over a hypothetical scenario that is already incredibly unpopular?
This post was edited on 6/12/22 at 10:13 pm
Posted on 6/12/22 at 10:12 pm to doubleb
Some people can easily see the risks associated with action but struggle to see the risks of inaction. OML is such a person.
Posted on 6/12/22 at 10:13 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
I am on Ukraine’s side, but not to the point it risks nuclear war.
MY GOD stop with this alarmist nonsense. It makes any other point you may actually had not be taken seriously. It is laughable to think this thing is leading to wards nuclear armageddon.
Posted on 6/12/22 at 10:16 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
quote:Good luck
MY GOD stop with this alarmist nonsense.
Posted on 6/12/22 at 10:17 pm to lostinbr
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/22/26 at 8:13 pm
Posted on 6/12/22 at 10:19 pm to OMLandshark
You've officially ruined this thread. Contact chicken to collect your price.
Stupidfricker
Stupidfricker
Posted on 6/12/22 at 10:19 pm to Baw Vivant
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/22/26 at 8:12 pm
Posted on 6/12/22 at 10:19 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Do you think Putin is going put up with us funding his chief enemy’s war for 10 billion dollars a month for long? How much of that is he going to take?
Why in frick’s name do you think we report to Daddy Putin? Jesus dickhole Christ y’all are insufferable.
Posted on 6/12/22 at 10:21 pm to Baw Vivant
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/22/26 at 8:12 pm
Posted on 6/12/22 at 10:27 pm to OMLandshark
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/22/26 at 8:12 pm
Posted on 6/12/22 at 10:30 pm to OMLandshark
Big Bad Putin is giving himself a hemorrhoid over the epic battle for Severodonetsk, yet you’re wetting your panties over the thought of him deciding “he’s had enough”
. You need to go butt chug some CBD oil or something.
Posted on 6/12/22 at 10:32 pm to Baw Vivant
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/22/26 at 8:12 pm
Popular
Back to top


1





