- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How do Creationists reconcile discoveries that date back hundreds of millions of years
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:23 am to StringedInstruments
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:23 am to StringedInstruments
quote:
Yeah, evolution actually does explain all of that.
Can you give me one example of a change of kind with observable evidence to support Darwin’s evolution theory???
If not Evolution is fake!
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:23 am to Turf Taint
quote:
Curious, how do Creationists reconcile discoveries that date back hundreds of millions of years and Creationism timeline of 6k years?
I don't know if I personally feel a need to reconcile anything God does that I don't have His grace to understand. I just thank Him for doing it.
However, I feel that when people hear that God created the heavens and the earth and everything in them in 6 days and rested on the 7th day, they think of their human calendar.
Gods timeline is not our timeline. As smart and intelligent as humans have become there are things we can't even conceive of that God has done and is doing. Most people can not humble themselves to understand this and IMO have tried to convince themselves that God is not real to compensate for the lack of knowledge. Probably not the best way to say it but somewhere in there is what I'm trying to say.
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:23 am to CoyoteSong
quote:
Carbon dating is not reliable
C-14 is radioactive and unstable, decaying over time. It's decay is a function of time. That time can be measured and eyeball proof that it happens in a systematic way, universally.
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:24 am to CoyoteSong
quote:
Can you give me one example of a change of kind with observable evidence to support Darwin’s evolution theory???
What is a change of kind?
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:24 am to Turf Taint
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:25 am to Turf Taint
No one is praying to Darwin as the plane is plunging to the ground with no engine power.
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:25 am to deltaland
quote:
People take the Bible too literally without understanding the men of the time had no concept of science or the modern calendar we use.
It is the height of human arrogance to assume that you could perceive space and time on the level of a being capable of creating the universe and take the Bible as literal fact and yet have to dumb it down into “In the beginning, God created the heavens and the Earth.”
I think if you’re solely focusing the debate on how literal 7 days is, then you’re kind of missing the point of the whole thing.
Edit: Just want to remind everyone that we’re literally debating “Boys have a penis girls have a vagina” all over the world right now. But science and stuff.
This post was edited on 7/19/22 at 7:28 am
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:26 am to Turf Taint
So basically you’ve taken a long winded route in saying there is a god.
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:26 am to Mid Iowa Tiger
You have the most aligned thinking to my own thus far, but you articulated it far better than I.
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:27 am to CoyoteSong
quote:
Can you give me one example of a change of kind with observable evidence to support Darwin’s evolution theory???
What version of Covid are we on now?
Viruses mutate constantly to new strains that ensures their survival. If not, the flu would have been extinct a long long time ago.
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:28 am to CoyoteSong
quote:
Carbon dating is crap.
Say it a third time and it may come true.
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:29 am to dgnx6
quote:
So basically you’ve taken a long winded route in saying there is a god.
Basically...ish.
But not positive same form as silver-haired male on a throne in heaven portrayal in most Christian faiths nor am I positive God's form is singular.
But, yes, this production of life ain't random or by accident
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:30 am to CoyoteSong
Living Mollusks shells dated to be 2,300 years old according to Carbon dating.
Freshly killed seal was dated to be 1,300 years old by Carbon dating.
Great science there.
Freshly killed seal was dated to be 1,300 years old by Carbon dating.

Great science there.
This post was edited on 7/19/22 at 7:33 am
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:31 am to NATidefan
quote:
Viruses mutate constantly to new strains that ensures their survival. If not, the flu would have been extinct a long long time ago.
So your answer is a virus becoming a virus.
Sorry buddy, I need a change of kind. Not an adaptation.
Surely you can up with one?!?
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:31 am to Turf Taint
We have whole civilizations dating back a mere couple of thousand years ago that are under many many feet of earth, but some supposed footprints from 100 million years ago are somehow untouched by wind, water, and erosion and in some guy’s restaurant courtyard? The likelihood of that in and of itself is mind boggling, maybe even as much as it is to actually date something to 100 million years ago in the first place.
People can argue what they like, but I’ll just say this, that it takes an enormous amount more faith to believe that everything you see before you originated from chance the likes of which defy any kind of rational logic than to believe we were created from a vastly intelligent creator, along with the rest of the universe for His own purposes. Play with numbers, but I’ll never have enough faith to believe what evolutionists are telling me I need to believe in in order to be accepted as intelligent. It’s ridiculous.
People can argue what they like, but I’ll just say this, that it takes an enormous amount more faith to believe that everything you see before you originated from chance the likes of which defy any kind of rational logic than to believe we were created from a vastly intelligent creator, along with the rest of the universe for His own purposes. Play with numbers, but I’ll never have enough faith to believe what evolutionists are telling me I need to believe in in order to be accepted as intelligent. It’s ridiculous.
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:32 am to Snipe
quote:
Probably not the best way to say it but somewhere in there is what I'm trying to say.
Clear and thank you! Hear you.
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:32 am to CoyoteSong
quote:
I need a change of kind
What the frick is a change of kind?
Did your preacher event this term?
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:33 am to Mike da Tigah
quote:
it takes an enormous amount more faith to believe that everything you see before you originated from chance the likes of which defy any kind of rational logic than to believe we were created from a vastly intelligent creator, along with the rest of the universe for His own purposes.

Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:34 am to Turf Taint
Creationist and evolutionists all can agree up to the same certain point then they each take a “leap” of faith.
Creationists put their faith in a creator, evolutionists put their faith in random events.
Creationists put their faith in a creator, evolutionists put their faith in random events.
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:34 am to Mo Jeaux
quote:
Why not?
It blows my mind how many people on this site accept creationism over evolution.
Popular
Back to top
