Started By
Message

re: How do Creationists reconcile discoveries that date back hundreds of millions of years

Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:44 am to
Posted by OU812ME2
Earth
Member since Jun 2021
823 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:44 am to
The lies of the Science community are far and wide. Once you follow the money provided by Liberals and foundations built on Satanic origins it's pretty obvious. Carbon dating never has been exact like they pretend it is. Just like finding 7 bones and creating some ape with human eyes out of 7 bones is real. If you take a real Scientific observation you would see this.

Science hasn't been based on Science in a long time. It's based on money.
Posted by CoyoteSong
Colorado
Member since Aug 2021
2603 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:45 am to
quote:

It’s not a random event, it’s time. Evolution doesn’t happen over 10 years, it takes lots time and adaptation. With enough of both a new species can form.


Scientific method by definition is it is observable and repeatable. Evolution is neither. That is not science. It is a fairy tale. A blind belief system. A religion in it’s own.

Fish become philosophers!! Monkeys become men! Nothing created everything! But we can’t prove it.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
58940 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:45 am to
Men wrote the Bible.
Posted by NATidefan
Two hours North of Birmingham
Member since Dec 2008
36105 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:45 am to
quote:

There are 18 different definitions of a species so I was asking for a change of kind.

You have the feline kind. Ex house cats, lions, tigers, cougars.
The canine kind: dog, wolf, etc…


Yet again, it doesn't work like that, nor does it happen overnight. You aren't going to have one species that has offspring of another that's completely different.



This post was edited on 7/19/22 at 7:51 am
Posted by Turf Taint
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2021
6010 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:45 am to
quote:

Wisdom teeth
the appendix

Its easy there are people born without those items now because we no longer need them. Enough of those changes over time and bam new species. Why is this so hard for everyone


Hear you

Why do you think the paleomammalian cortex (limbic system) exists in humans but not reptiles?

Just because or was that purposeful?

Perhaps having an optimistic alligator was not to be? Or an emotionful Tiger stadium was of course to be?
Posted by CoyoteSong
Colorado
Member since Aug 2021
2603 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:46 am to
Scientific method by definition is it is observable and repeatable. Evolution is neither. That is not science. It is a fairy tale. A blind belief system. A religion in it’s own.
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
18702 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:46 am to
quote:

Evolution doesn’t happen over 10 years, it takes lots time and adaptation.


Time doesn’t explain it all. There hasn’t been and won’t be shown enough time in earths history for humans to have formed on their own through evolution alone. Look at my original post. The math and science are not on pure evolution’s side.
Posted by olddawg26
Member since Jan 2013
24629 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:46 am to
Is there anyone in this thread under 40 years old that thinks evolution theory is bogus? Doing a poll
Posted by TacoNash
Member since Mar 2020
715 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:47 am to
quote:

Yet again, it doesn't work like that, nor does it happen overnight you aren't going to have one species that has offspring of another that's completely different.


No point in wasting your time on people who don’t even know what evolution is even though they say they “know it’s fake science”. MFers can’t even take the time to know/understand what they are calling fake
This post was edited on 7/19/22 at 7:49 am
Posted by Turf Taint
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2021
6010 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:47 am to
quote:

Men wrote the Bible.


Men!

And across many years!

Influenced by context of their time with the pen!

Hear you.
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
10434 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:47 am to
quote:

They did Carbon dating on a wooly mammoth. His skin was dated 4000 years old, his tooth 2000 years old, and another piece of tissue was dated 9000 years. All samples were from the same wooly mammoth.

Carbon dating is crap.
Link?
Posted by NATidefan
Two hours North of Birmingham
Member since Dec 2008
36105 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:48 am to
quote:

Scientific method by definition is it is observable and repeatable. Evolution is neither. That is not science. It is a fairy tale. A blind belief system. A religion in it’s own


Well if you believe in DNA being used as evidence you might as well believe in evolution, buddy.

Cause the same thing that says you are the father says you are distantly related to your dog. And it's observable and repeatable in everything living thing on the planet.
This post was edited on 7/19/22 at 8:00 am
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
10434 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:50 am to
quote:

No one is praying to Darwin as the plane is plunging to the ground with no engine power.
And that proves evolution theory is wrong?
Posted by Turf Taint
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2021
6010 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:50 am to
quote:

That's still evolution. Evolution doesn't state how life started. Just that basically everything is related at the genetic level and all living things slowly evolved from the same organism branching off into different species. Like a tree.


True-ish, but what if it were created with many different Adams and Eves in many parts of the Earth? Key word...created!

See Iowa Tiger's post for the Physics explanation of creationism. Very interesting and in my way of thinking about it.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57410 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:50 am to
Based on this thread, it seems no one actually reads anymore

Evolution and Creationism are not mutually exclusive positions

C.S. Lewis believed in both. The position even has a name…GASP…theistic evolution

Thread’s over
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
10434 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:51 am to
quote:

Scientific method by definition is it is observable and repeatable.
That's not the definition of scientific method.
Posted by NATidefan
Two hours North of Birmingham
Member since Dec 2008
36105 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:52 am to
quote:

Monkeys become men!


This just proves to me how poorly you understand evolution.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57410 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:52 am to
quote:

True-ish,


What he said isn’t true-ish

It’s flat out true

Evolution doesn’t speak to abiogenesis at all

That’s why I laugh at people who think evolution is winning argument against theism
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
10434 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:52 am to
quote:

Based on this thread, it seems no one actually reads anymore

Evolution and Creationism are not mutually exclusive positions

C.S. Lewis believed in both. The position even has a name…GASP…theistic evolution

Thread’s over
Well, if CS Lewis believed it, it must be so.
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
10434 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:53 am to
quote:

That’s why I laugh at people who think evolution is winning argument against theism
No one has made that argument
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 22
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 22Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram