- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How concerned are you about the water levels in Lake Mead?
Posted on 6/20/22 at 12:29 pm to TigerTatorTots
Posted on 6/20/22 at 12:29 pm to TigerTatorTots
Probably shouldn't have massive golf courses, huge grass yards, and palm trees in a desert.
I enjoyed the desert landscaping for yards in AZ, no maintenance and looks cool
Start there
I enjoyed the desert landscaping for yards in AZ, no maintenance and looks cool
Start there
Posted on 6/20/22 at 12:33 pm to metallica81788
This thing is now completely out of the water and you could walk up to it if not for sinking in the mud.


Posted on 6/20/22 at 12:38 pm to bgtiger
quote:
Explain to me why it's impossible? So oil is easier to pump or push than water? Serious question, Clark.
I’m a mechanical engineer and have done hydraulic studies on this idea for clients. No one is biting on the idea even with federal funding. It’s not only cost prohibitive it’s energy restrictive. For example let’s say you need a 120,000 horse power booster station in the middle of BFE New Mexico, where are you going to get that kind of power in remote location like this?
And comparing pumping oil to water is off by a large factor. In terms of volume we use significantly more water than oil.
Posted on 6/20/22 at 12:39 pm to Klark Kent
Okay, but that was a lot of work for sarcasm. 
Posted on 6/20/22 at 12:40 pm to NatalbanyTigerFan
quote:
Same here but our safety guy brought it up in the meeting this morning and we were all like "frick those people they don't give a shite about us!"
He wasn't too happy about that.
Posted on 6/20/22 at 12:49 pm to terriblegreen
quote:
I realize the repercussions of California losing water.... I can deal with it.
Are you able to grow and preserve most of the fruit and vegetables your family consumes?
Posted on 6/20/22 at 12:57 pm to Scruffy
quote:
35 million gallons vs over 500 million just for LA
Water is corrosive too I think.
Ethanol added gasoline isn't piped due to corrosion issues.
I'd imagine water would be similar.
Not only volumes and economics, but corrosion issues as well.
Posted on 6/20/22 at 1:03 pm to The Third Leg
I guess they’re gonna start having to use Brawndo on the crops out there
Posted on 6/20/22 at 1:10 pm to metallica81788
Yeah the rich fricks in California that live way outside what they should. Caused by a culture that is socialist in name only, while having the most millionaires by a landslide... all the while importing millions of Mexicans across the region.
The worst part is that all this will do is hurt the poor in California, throwing them into our area, meanwhile the rich will keep going to UC Berkeley protests against Trump or whatever
The worst part is that all this will do is hurt the poor in California, throwing them into our area, meanwhile the rich will keep going to UC Berkeley protests against Trump or whatever
Posted on 6/20/22 at 1:23 pm to Privateer 2007
quote:
Water is corrosive too I think.
Meh, not really. Anodes are put on some steel water pipelines but corrosion is not mitigated at the same level as O&G pipelines. It is critical that O&G pipeline do not leak so cathodic protection systems are required. Not so much for water pipelines. If you get a leak in a water line generally it’s no big deal. You just fix it. It’s a massive deal if an oil pipeline leaks.
Posted on 6/20/22 at 1:32 pm to doubleb
IDK
I do find it interesting that there's been enough research into this to chart it, however, it only seems to have become discussed more in the news/ online beginning around 2018
I do find it interesting that there's been enough research into this to chart it, however, it only seems to have become discussed more in the news/ online beginning around 2018
Posted on 6/20/22 at 1:32 pm to GumboPot
quote:People really have no idea as to how much water we use daily.
And comparing pumping oil to water is off by a large factor. In terms of volume we use significantly more water than oil.
Per my basic calculations, the state of California uses roughly 5 BILLION gallons of water daily.
And that’s a real rough estimate based off the idea that each CA resident uses 125 gallons daily on average.
That volume is obscene and not even remotely possible.
Posted on 6/20/22 at 1:35 pm to NatalbanyTigerFan
Been waiting for the world to end. Anything speed up the process Im thrilled about.
Bonus points of I get to see the faces when it hits them.
Bonus points of I get to see the faces when it hits them.
Posted on 6/20/22 at 1:37 pm to EarlyCuyler3
quote:
This thing is now completely out of the water and you could walk up to it if not for sinking in the mud.
And evaporation will only intensify over the next few months
Posted on 6/20/22 at 1:38 pm to Scruffy
quote:
People really have no idea as to how much water we use daily.
The east bank of NOLA is supplied by the Carrollton water treatment plant. It treats 110 million gallons of water per day. The city only measures half of that…lol, but that is a different issue.
Posted on 6/20/22 at 1:40 pm to cable
Isn’t that area of the west entering the monsoon season?
Posted on 6/20/22 at 1:40 pm to NatalbanyTigerFan
Seems.like a good place to displace all the sea level rise
Posted on 6/20/22 at 1:41 pm to Klark Kent
I’m glad I read your whole post. I thought you were a nutcase at first.
Posted on 6/20/22 at 1:42 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
Popular
Back to top


2





