- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Hippie gives a solid treatise on why birth rates and relationships are broken. . .based
Posted on 5/3/26 at 9:17 am
Posted on 5/3/26 at 9:17 am
Posted on 5/3/26 at 9:24 am to Roaad
So can I sue match.com for my divorce? They have to be held accountable for matching me with my ex-wife.
Posted on 5/3/26 at 9:34 am to Roaad
Men date across and down.
Women date up.
SM gives women a very inaccurate assessment of themselves, artificially inflating their value in their minds.
The extension of this warped perception is that very few men are "up."
In reality, they're a 5-6 and there are many 5-6 men who would be great husbands and fathers, but those guys are invisible to them.
Women date up.
SM gives women a very inaccurate assessment of themselves, artificially inflating their value in their minds.
The extension of this warped perception is that very few men are "up."
In reality, they're a 5-6 and there are many 5-6 men who would be great husbands and fathers, but those guys are invisible to them.
Posted on 5/3/26 at 9:40 am to Roaad
It's simpler than technology: there are just too many people in the world.
Maybe not spread out worldwide but we tend to gather in socioeconomic centers where the density hits a lot harder. Nobody wants kids when they feel like they are already overwhelmed.
Our biology established kids as helping hands to the tribe or farm over thousands of years. Kids were needed to help survive. You can't just escape that instinct. But in a city and increasingly dense suburbia you don't need kids to survive, in fact it is the exact opposite.
We need to spread back out if we want the birth rate to head upwards.
Maybe not spread out worldwide but we tend to gather in socioeconomic centers where the density hits a lot harder. Nobody wants kids when they feel like they are already overwhelmed.
Our biology established kids as helping hands to the tribe or farm over thousands of years. Kids were needed to help survive. You can't just escape that instinct. But in a city and increasingly dense suburbia you don't need kids to survive, in fact it is the exact opposite.
We need to spread back out if we want the birth rate to head upwards.
Posted on 5/3/26 at 9:55 am to forkedintheroad
quote:Completely disagree.
Maybe not spread out worldwide but we tend to gather in socioeconomic centers where the density hits a lot harder. Nobody wants kids when they feel like they are already overwhelmed.
I don’t think that is a factor at all, not even in the top 50 reasons.
IMO, it is due to the social marketing and economic systems we currently reside in.
The younger generations are growing up and becoming adults later and later. It used to be that you were an adult at 18, maybe after college at the latest. You had to grow up to survive.
Now, you are essentially a child until your mid-20s to early 30s.
Society has allowed that for economic reasons. We tell young men and women to go out an have fun in their 20s, their prime years.
You don’t have to “grow up” until later. You can have kids later.
Children are tough, time consuming, and force you to set aside your own wants and pleasures.
Our social system tells us not to do that. Live your life for you. You are the most important being in the universe.
Why would anyone have children when society is telling them to not reproduce and put it off?
Then there is the cost, but that plays into what I already said.
Having kids is expensive, but doable, but you have to sacrifice to do it.
Why would anyone in modern society want to sacrifice for the future?
This post was edited on 5/3/26 at 9:57 am
Posted on 5/3/26 at 9:59 am to Roaad
He is right. Technology advances need to be viewed from the lens of "is this good for people or not".
Posted on 5/3/26 at 10:15 am to Longhorn Actual
quote:Women need a good reason to have sex.
Men date across and down.
Women date up.
Men just need a place...
Posted on 5/3/26 at 10:22 am to Roaad
He's not wrong in the beginning, but like every other dirty hippy, the argument always comes around to a desire for more government control.
Posted on 5/3/26 at 10:29 am to Roaad
Is the population of every country in Earth supposed to always increase, forever?
Furthermore, are countries as they currently exist today supposed to exist that way forever?
Furthermore, are countries as they currently exist today supposed to exist that way forever?
This post was edited on 5/3/26 at 10:30 am
Posted on 5/3/26 at 10:51 am to Roaad
Kids are coming up with their noses shoved a couple inches away from a phone or ipad screen everywhere they go, including most situations that were social a couple generations ago.
When a 8, 9, 10 year old goes to any gathering with his parents, that used to be practice for socializing for the kid. Now it’s screen time in a corner.
They never learn to talk to other human beings on a regular basis, face to face. When dating time comes around, that’s a huge deficit. Ditto job interviews.
Posted on 5/3/26 at 10:59 am to Roaad
I wouldn't call that guy a hippie.
Posted on 5/3/26 at 11:00 am to Scruffy
quote:
Why would anyone in modern society want to sacrifice for the future?
Because raising kids is quite possibly the greatest experience one can have! Not a sacrifice for the future!
Thoroughly enjoyed my 20's; married when I turned 30; had my three kids from age 35-38. I wouldn't change a thing
Society didn't tell me jack shite! I lived my life based on choices and the consequences of those choices not some overwhelming pressure from society telling or guiding me in certain direction. This mindset is a load of narrative horseshite based on the need to explain the results of collective actions of individuals making the decision based on whats best for them.
If it has to be explained it's probably better explained in biology. People are having are settling down later in life and are trying to reproduce in their less fertile years. I would be willing to bet that many of the couples that are publicly stating they don't want kids are having trouble conceiving and use the myriad of the "society says excuses that you spewed as cover up for the root cause because it is mentally extremely painful for women that can't have kids to admit their struggles. I watched it first hand for 5 years.
Follow the science!
This post was edited on 5/3/26 at 11:13 am
Posted on 5/3/26 at 11:02 am to Scruffy
quote:
Why would anyone in modern society want to sacrifice for the future?
Is this a rhetorical question?
Posted on 5/3/26 at 11:03 am to Roaad
This guy isn’t getting laid but it’s got a lot more to do with looking, sounding and appearing like a woman than it does technology.
Posted on 5/3/26 at 11:09 am to forkedintheroad
quote:
It's simpler than technology: there are just too many people in the world.
That's called "behavioral sink" (google: Universe 25 experiments) and I think it's part of the issue but more a symptom than a root cause.
When basic needs (food, water, clothing shelter) are met, we focus on higher order needs. Once those basic needs are met, it may well be that other needs are skewed (procreation, predominantly) out of the basics category to one of those higher order levels (and in doing so it goes from procreation to non-procreational, or recreational, sex).
Another part of that skewing is that with our basic needs pretty much met as a default (to the point where we no longer wonder "will I eat today?" but rather "how much of which food will I be bothered to eat today?" as an example) we take that time and energy which was once used in pursuit of those basic needs and focus them on the higher order needs. In other words, social issues become more of a focus even to the point where they are considered priorities over basic needs (since those are met as a default, think of it as "perceived needs").
As technology allows for more and more of those more basic needs to be met (sometimes just artificially, like with robot sex dolls, AI girlfriends, whatever), more and more of that energy goes into focusing on social issues and social issues create strife because social issue stances are seen increasingly as a part of Self. This means the strife comes more and more from disagreements on social issues taken in as being personal attacks (attacks on the Self).
As that increases, we become more and more disconnected. That's the foundation for my belief that we are nowhere near ready for the post-scarcity society AI and robots could bring.
This post was edited on 5/3/26 at 11:29 am
Posted on 5/3/26 at 11:17 am to weagle1999
quote:So mass shifts in the most important human behavior is a nothing burger?
Is the population of every country in Earth supposed to always increase, forever?
quote:No, but that is a non sequitur
Furthermore, are countries as they currently exist today supposed to exist that way forever?
Posted on 5/3/26 at 11:18 am to armytiger96
quote:Tell that to the younger generations who are being told to “live for me” and put off growing up.
Because raising kids is quite possibly the greatest experience one can have! Not a sacrifice for the future!
quote:Some of you are incapable of accepting that outside voices, social pressures, social marketing, economics, etc., have impacts on social norms.
Society didn't tell me jack shite! I lived my life based on choices and the consequences of those choices not some overwhelming pressure from society telling or guiding me in certain direction. This mindset is a load of narrative horseshite based on the need to explain the results of collective actions of individuals making the decision based on whats best for them.
For decades, people have been stating that women should not have kids and put it off until later. Are you denying that that has had an impact?
Average age of marriage and first pregnancy was in the low 20s just 50 years ago.
Now it is 30 years old or higher, and steadily increasing.
Why aren’t we constantly telling the younger generations to build families, have children, etc.?
Hell, Musk was laughed at when he said people should have more kids.
This post was edited on 5/3/26 at 11:22 am
Posted on 5/3/26 at 11:19 am to GRTiger
quote:Yes.
Is this a rhetorical question?
Go ask a woman in their low to mid 20s why they haven’t had children.
Posted on 5/3/26 at 11:21 am to armytiger96
quote:The younger generations are not having children in their most fertile years.
I would be willing to bet that many of the couples that are publicly stating they don't want kids are having trouble conceiving and use the myriad of the "society says excuses that you spewed as cover up for the root cause because it is mentally extremely painful for women that can't have kids to admit their struggles. I watched it first hand for 5 years.
Why not?
Popular
Back to top


12










