Started By
Message

re: High Earners Age 50 and Older Are About to Lose a Major 401(k) Tax Break

Posted on 9/24/25 at 9:51 am to
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
32725 posts
Posted on 9/24/25 at 9:51 am to
quote:

In the event you dont know what logic is, your statement has nothing to do with the fact that taxation is theft. Everyone else doing it doesnt make something right. If you would like to learn more about logic, reasoning and fallacies, intro level philosophy classes are a great place to start.

Applying a red herring in a lecture about logic and fallacies is a bold move
Posted by cubsfan5150
NWA
Member since Nov 2007
17825 posts
Posted on 9/24/25 at 10:02 am to
How would zero taxes work in America? I'm genuinely curious.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
39646 posts
Posted on 9/24/25 at 10:07 am to
quote:

tax loopholes


Can we put this phrase to bed? It is so dumb.

quote:

Simplify the tax code. Reduce the IRS


Yes please.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
78062 posts
Posted on 9/24/25 at 10:07 am to
quote:

threshold for a high earner at more than $145,000 in wages.
That's not "high."
Posted by Grinder
Member since Nov 2007
2475 posts
Posted on 9/24/25 at 10:17 am to
quote:

And you aren’t forced to live here. Move to the Bolivian Amazon and live off the jungle, you won’t have to pay taxes


Show us on the doll where the rich people touched you.
Posted by Auburn80
Backwater, TN
Member since Nov 2017
9598 posts
Posted on 9/24/25 at 10:22 am to
Biden assured us nothing would happen to anyone making less than $400,000.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
68968 posts
Posted on 9/24/25 at 10:35 am to
145k AGI or gross?
Posted by Prawn
Member since Jul 2025
36 posts
Posted on 9/24/25 at 10:36 am to
AGI
Posted by N2cars
Close by
Member since Feb 2008
37915 posts
Posted on 9/24/25 at 10:37 am to
Good grief, how many of thosr are there?


Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
68968 posts
Posted on 9/24/25 at 10:39 am to
Good info. That would put one's salary closer to 180k assuming 401k max and standard deduction for a single filer.

Still should be higher.
Posted by UnluckyTiger
Member since Sep 2003
41675 posts
Posted on 9/24/25 at 10:40 am to
quote:

since the Social Security contribution cap is currently at $176,100
This shite right here is out of control, insane how much it’s risen since 2015.

quote:

2015 $118,500
2016 $118,500
2017 $127,200
2018 $128,400
2019 $132,900
2020 $137,700
2021 $142,800
2022 $147,000
2023 $160,200
2024 $168,600
2025 $176,100


And 145 being considered high earner is laughable in 2025. That hasn’t been the case since Covid.
This post was edited on 9/24/25 at 10:43 am
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
78062 posts
Posted on 9/24/25 at 10:43 am to
The more I think about it, might it not be helpful for those who haven't been able to contribute to a Roth because their income was above the limits? Wouldn't have to do a backdoor Roth and get hit with the pro-rata rule, correct?
This post was edited on 9/24/25 at 10:44 am
Posted by ThatTahoeOverThere
Member since Nov 2021
4643 posts
Posted on 9/24/25 at 11:07 am to
quote:

I encourage you to move to a country with no taxation and see how that works out for you baw


You would have to find a country without a central bank.
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
106109 posts
Posted on 9/24/25 at 11:13 am to
quote:

They actually weren’t in this case, which is why they made this rule.

Older workers were putting in pre tax money. Said worker dies, but never pulls the money out the traditional 401k, thus it isn’t taxed. That money is then passed down to their heirs at a stepped up basis and tax is never paid on the incremental amount between their contribution amount and the new basis amount


Lets be honest, taxing retirement funds has always been double dipping by the government. They get theirs when we get paid and then they get it again when you're taxed in retirement.
Posted by Old Character
Member since Jan 2018
1506 posts
Posted on 9/24/25 at 11:15 am to
Doing us a favor.
Posted by Deuces
The bottom
Member since Nov 2011
16327 posts
Posted on 9/24/25 at 11:17 am to
Roth’s are more beneficial since your money grows tax free.
Posted by Prawn
Member since Jul 2025
36 posts
Posted on 9/24/25 at 11:26 am to
quote:

I encourage you to move to a country with no taxation and see how that works out for you baw


I could never bring myself to actually do it, but always dreamed about living between Dubai and Costa Rica and paying no taxes. I have several British coworkers who do just that and it works out pretty well for them.
Posted by thelawnwranglers
Member since Sep 2007
41998 posts
Posted on 9/24/25 at 11:30 am to
quote:

I'd rather pay them now than pay them later. I feel pretty confident that taxes are not going to go down in the next 40 years.


What if they don't honor promise of tax free growth (or based on your good savings cut your SS)

I get your sentiment, but I am all don't pay until I have to.
This post was edited on 9/24/25 at 11:31 am
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
75873 posts
Posted on 9/24/25 at 11:30 am to
quote:

Older workers were putting in pre tax money. Said worker dies, but never pulls the money out the traditional 401k, thus it isn’t taxed. That money is then passed down to their heirs at a stepped up basis and tax is never paid on the incremental amount between their contribution amount and the new basis amount

Nope
Posted by KCRoyalBlue
Member since Nov 2020
1892 posts
Posted on 9/24/25 at 1:03 pm to
We would also accept, "Tax deez nuts".

first pageprev pagePage 5 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram