Started By
Message

re: Have you watched The Social Dilemma

Posted on 9/17/20 at 8:19 am to
Posted by LoneStar23
USA
Member since Aug 2019
5162 posts
Posted on 9/17/20 at 8:19 am to
quote:

Facebook was originally meant to be the place where you set up parties, follow local biz, etc. To the younger people, it is a news source, a source of their version of truth.

This. It has changed so much since I originally made an account 10 years ago. None of that being for the better
Posted by IAmNERD
Member since May 2017
19207 posts
Posted on 9/17/20 at 8:19 am to
quote:

I just hope that it shows people just how much money they are worth as the product

Paraphrasing something someone in the doc said here: "If a company provides a product without charging you for it, then you are the product."
Posted by ConfusedHawgInMO
Member since Apr 2014
3495 posts
Posted on 9/17/20 at 8:21 am to
(no message)
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83556 posts
Posted on 9/17/20 at 8:21 am to
quote:

This. It has changed so much since I originally made an account 10 years ago. None of that being for the better



pfft

try 16 years ago
Posted by Ed Osteen
Member since Oct 2007
57474 posts
Posted on 9/17/20 at 8:21 am to
I remember when Instagram was just pictures of people I know, now I barely even see those on my feed.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72062 posts
Posted on 9/17/20 at 8:21 am to
quote:

easily shareable information, which is the entire point
The creators of these programs even stated that that isn’t the point.

The point is addictive behavior.
quote:

social media has never given me any type of grief or anxiety because I'm not using it to seek out my outrage porn
Then you are the clear outlier, but we don’t make determinations based off of outliers.
quote:

the benefits for me are easily able to set up parties/gatherings, follow local businesses that promote on social media, easily keep up with friends and family, all of which are positive and beneficial things to me
You can do all of that without being on social media, at the same level of ease as well.

Scruffy does.
quote:

I'll never understand why a place like TD, that almost always preaches personal responsibility, completely trashes that thought when it comes to social media
Well, Scruffy doesn’t represent all of TD.

He will say that, despite your reported “benefits”, when the creators of these programs are stating things as significant as “what we have created will destroy the fabric of our societies”, we should listen.

The insanity is just getting started.

And removing “political ads” will not do anything to quell that.
Posted by ConfusedHawgInMO
Member since Apr 2014
3495 posts
Posted on 9/17/20 at 8:21 am to
quote:

However they probably will call this fake news and turn it back to WWE and drink more mountain dews.


I'm not a barbarian! It was a splash of Diet Dew in Beam Black thank you very much
This post was edited on 9/17/20 at 8:22 am
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51270 posts
Posted on 9/17/20 at 8:21 am to
quote:


oh trust me, I constantly worry about the day that my kids get on social media



It is worrisome because you know you'll never be able to keep them off of it.

You basically have to teach them as early as possible that social media doesn't matter and there are so many more important things.

But shite, even those damn kids games on the phone...LOADED with advertising.
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83556 posts
Posted on 9/17/20 at 8:25 am to
quote:

The creators of these programs even stated that that isn’t the point.

The point is addictive behavior.


well yeah

the point for most product is to get you to return to it

quote:

Then you are the clear outlier, but we don’t make determinations based off of outliers.


I don't think I'm an outlier, do you know how many people are on social media?

if they were all depressed and/or had anxiety over it, we would be collapsing as a society

quote:

You can do all of that without being on social media, at the same level of ease as well.

Scruffy does.


no you can't and Scruffy doesn't

quote:

He will say that, despite your reported “benefits”, when the creators of these programs are stating things as significant as “what we have created will destroy the fabric of our societies”, we should listen.


We should. People need to have self awareness and realize the things that give them anxiety/grief and remove those things from their lives. Absolutely.

quote:

And removing “political ads” will not do anything to quell that.


Yeah. I agree. I already said as much.
Posted by YumYum Sauce
Arkansas
Member since Nov 2010
8311 posts
Posted on 9/17/20 at 8:27 am to
the absolute worst thing about social media is its given then have-nots a place to congregate
Posted by wutangfinancial
Treasure Valley
Member since Sep 2015
11096 posts
Posted on 9/17/20 at 8:30 am to
quote:

Massive spikes in anxiety, depression, and suicide in younger generations.


This is a correlation. Much more variables than social media causing this problem.

quote:

Massive social polarity secondary to tribalism generated, not by the people using the programs, but generated by the programs themselves.


This is a perceived narrative driven by antecdotes.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72062 posts
Posted on 9/17/20 at 8:37 am to
quote:

This is a correlation. Much more variables than social media causing this problem.
Nearly all of the data points to the spike initiating around 2009-10, when social media accounts really took off.

There is always more than one variable, but the impact of Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, etc., are number one, by a huge margin.
quote:

This is a perceived narrative driven by antecdotes.


That is a narrative pushed by the people who created these programs.
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83556 posts
Posted on 9/17/20 at 8:40 am to
quote:

Massive social polarity secondary to tribalism generated, not by the people using the programs, but generated by the programs themselves.



lets discuss this

the programs give you, the user, what you want, which is what they are designed to do

so why are we blaming the program here and not the user?

if the user wants outrage porn and the program gives them outrage porn, whose fault is that?
This post was edited on 9/17/20 at 8:41 am
Posted by Hulkklogan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2010
43299 posts
Posted on 9/17/20 at 8:51 am to
quote:

The creators of these companies from the show say the only solution is to remove them there is no fixing what they have created



That doesn't mean there are no positive aspects. It means they believe they're a net negative to society.

There are positives and negatives to just about anything, but whether the positives outweigh the negatives has to be determined. In the case of social media - it could quite possibly be the case that they're a net negative.
Posted by Hulkklogan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2010
43299 posts
Posted on 9/17/20 at 8:55 am to
quote:

lets discuss this

the programs give you, the user, what you want, which is what they are designed to do

so why are we blaming the program here and not the user?

if the user wants outrage porn and the program gives them outrage porn, whose fault is that?


They are not giving you what you want. They're giving you whatever keeps your attention the most for advertisers. Just because it holds your attention doesn't mean that's what you consciously want. That's the whole premise.

That's too simplistic a view. These programs are deliberately manipulating us and pushing us to outrage porn. They're tapping on weaknesses in our psyche to nudge us ever more in the direction of disorder and chaos because negative news is inherently more attention-grabbing to our lizard brains.



quote:

if they were all depressed and/or had anxiety over it, we would be collapsing as a society


Have you seen our society over the last decade? It's certainly not headed in a great direction. We're polarizing and devolving into chaos.
This post was edited on 9/17/20 at 9:00 am
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83556 posts
Posted on 9/17/20 at 8:58 am to
quote:

They are not giving you what you want. They're giving you whatever keeps your attention the most for advertisers. Just because it holds your attention doesn't mean that's what you consciously want. That's the whole premise.


...how does this make sense? you may say I don't want to see this, but if you keep coming back to it to see certain things, then you want to see it

quote:

That's too simplistic a view. These programs are deliberately manipulating us and pushing us to outrage porn. They're tapping on weaknesses in our psyche to nudge us ever more in the direction of disorder and chaos because negative news is inherently more attention-grabbing to our lizard brains.


because that is what we want

we, as a society, want to see those things

none of this would be effective if we didn't actively want it

quote:

Have you seen our society over the last decade? It's certainly not headed in a great direction. We've polarizing and devolving into chaos.


yes and it isn't anything new

we have had periods far worse than this with no social media

This post was edited on 9/17/20 at 8:59 am
Posted by wutangfinancial
Treasure Valley
Member since Sep 2015
11096 posts
Posted on 9/17/20 at 9:00 am to
No you just think everybody around you is functionally retarded. You realize everybody in this country understands these issues right? How many people do you know that takes the opposite stance? Outside of young people I'm guessing your first point isn't proveable and more related to economic despair.

quote:

That is a narrative pushed by the people who created these programs.


No it's not. I understand what the academics think these companies are capable of but they aren't there yet. Nobody is on Twitter and FBs popularity isn't improving. People on instagram aren't pulling news from Instagram. My guess is this documentary is based in theory and correlation much like the other surveillance capital pieces. The government is who we should be worrying about with 5G and merging with these companies through regulations. These companies seem untouchable at their peak like they have for the past hundred years and they will eventually go quietly into the night.
Posted by Hulkklogan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2010
43299 posts
Posted on 9/17/20 at 9:02 am to
quote:

...how does this make sense? you may say I don't want to see this, but if you keep coming back to it to see certain things, then you want to see it



Because you're being manipulated - they're giving you that dopamine hit with whatever they send and advertisers are paying big bucks for that attention time. You want it like a crackhead wants crack. Your logic is in the same vein as saying "well, what's wrong with a crack dealer? He's just giving crackheads what they want."
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83556 posts
Posted on 9/17/20 at 9:04 am to
quote:

Because you're being manipulated - they're giving you that dopamine hit with whatever they send and advertisers are paying big bucks for that attention time.


how is this any different from any other product/marketing? how is it different from sugar? coffee? etc?

quote:

You want it like a crackhead wants crack. Your logic is in the same vein as saying "well, what's wrong with a crack dealer? He's just giving crackheads what they want."



Yeah. I know.

I think drugs should be legal, so...

Posted by BiggerBear
Redbone Country
Member since Sep 2011
2923 posts
Posted on 9/17/20 at 9:11 am to
quote:

Silicon Valley weirdos desperate to be in front of a camera conflating their importance to society.


What are they conflating it with?
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram