- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Favorite Military Aircraft
Posted on 9/19/15 at 1:58 am to RedlandsTiger
Posted on 9/19/15 at 1:58 am to RedlandsTiger
I work on F-15s so that's my vote. Undefeated baby
Posted on 9/19/15 at 2:45 am to RazorTiger30
B58 with the hammer down!!
Posted on 9/19/15 at 3:25 am to StraightCashHomey21
I'm old school...
F/A-18 Superhornet
I remember reading about these in my Dad's Jane's Fighting Ships when it was still "in development" while I was a kid.
F/A-18 Superhornet
I remember reading about these in my Dad's Jane's Fighting Ships when it was still "in development" while I was a kid.
Posted on 9/19/15 at 5:49 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Mach 3.2 and 86,000 feet.
I think that's classified speed. There's no telling how fast it really is. Me and the fam went on a short vacation to the USAF museum in Dayton OH this summer. They have a SR71 and a YF12. Badass planes. I would highly recommend to anyone interested in aircraft to visit that museum.
This post was edited on 9/19/15 at 5:51 am
Posted on 9/19/15 at 7:24 am to Knight of Old
Always been a fan of the B1 Lancer. Would love to see one in person


Posted on 9/19/15 at 7:27 am to RazorTiger30
SR71 is a very interesting plane...
The speeds it traveled presented unique problems associated with the increased heat from friction...
You can find articles that tell how the plane would leak fuel on the runway prior to take off because they had to build the plane taking into account heat expansion. So seams and joints on the plane did not "seal" properly until after take off and the heat would seal up the fuel leaks.
I remember reading somewhere that the planes length would increase by up to 2 feet (if I recall correctly) due to heat expansion....
The speeds it traveled presented unique problems associated with the increased heat from friction...
You can find articles that tell how the plane would leak fuel on the runway prior to take off because they had to build the plane taking into account heat expansion. So seams and joints on the plane did not "seal" properly until after take off and the heat would seal up the fuel leaks.
I remember reading somewhere that the planes length would increase by up to 2 feet (if I recall correctly) due to heat expansion....
Posted on 9/19/15 at 7:27 am to DawgCountry
quote:
Always been a fan of the B1 Lancer. Would love to see one in person
I've seen one about 500m from my position when it almost crashed into my A/C and an A-10 on a low pass "show of force" in RC-E.
This post was edited on 9/19/15 at 7:29 am
Posted on 9/19/15 at 7:28 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
F-4 Phantom II
Great bird!
Posted on 9/19/15 at 7:39 am to munchman
5 pages and no mention of the P51 Mustang?
A10/ F15 for modern planes.
A10/ F15 for modern planes.
Posted on 9/19/15 at 8:22 am to antibarner
quote:
How fast would the SR71 really go and what was the ceiling?
Classified but publically admitted Mach 3.2 and 86,000 feet. The J58's could go faster than the airframe could handle.
Posted on 9/19/15 at 8:32 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
Vintage: P-51
Modern: F-15
have to agree here. I love the Strike eagle.
I also like the P-82 twin Mustang. It's like two P-51 mustangs, but put together.

Posted on 9/19/15 at 8:46 am to Napoleon
for sheer length of service...the B-57 Canberra
NASA is still flying 3 WB-57F's

NASA is still flying 3 WB-57F's

This post was edited on 9/19/15 at 8:53 am
Posted on 9/19/15 at 9:15 am to vl100butch
quote:
for sheer length of service...the B-57 Canberra
I had never even heard of it..
quote:
The Canberra was the first U.S. jet bomber to drop bombs during combat

Posted on 9/19/15 at 9:31 am to Napoleon
The F-15 and the strike eagle are not the same thing. When you say F-15 you are typically referring the the more badass version, which is the C model.
Posted on 9/19/15 at 9:33 am to Drew Orleans
I saw the 2 planes fly over my office yesterday around 3:30. They were loud, and awesome. Happened so fast but I thought they were F-15's. I know very little about planes, but did anybody confirm what they were?
ETA: Looking at Google pics, I think they might have been F-18s, but not positive.
ETA: Looking at Google pics, I think they might have been F-18s, but not positive.
This post was edited on 9/19/15 at 9:36 am
Posted on 9/19/15 at 9:41 am to dr smartass phd
quote:
publically admitted Mach 3.2 and 86,000 feet.
Brian Shul says (unconfirmed) he exceeded Mach 3.5 in evading a missile over Libya in 1986.
I think the 86k feet is a little high. They've admitted to a 1976 flight of 85,069 feet (Robert Helt, Pilot and Larry Elliot, RSO).
(ETA: Brian Shul is the author of the legendary SR-71 "ground speed check" story.)
This post was edited on 9/19/15 at 9:42 am
Posted on 9/19/15 at 9:59 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
Brian Shul
I have the pdf of Sled Driver. Read it about a dozen times and get lost in it for what seems like hours everytime I read it.
Popular
Back to top


0










