- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DOJ employee upset she was fired over her obstruction of justice......
Posted on 7/22/25 at 10:53 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 7/22/25 at 10:53 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I tell people about DUI checkpoints all the time. I have no idea if they are driving legally or not. Just last week I posted cops running radar. I have no idea if the people who read that were speeding or not.
So why would legal immigrants have a use for the iceblock app?
1
Posted on 7/22/25 at 10:57 am to tilthatday
Bad example because that’s not true. It was ruled that you can yell fire in a theatre. But you can also be sued civilly if it causes someone harm
Posted on 7/22/25 at 10:58 am to ForeverEllisHugh
quote:
The app is free speech deal with it.
Thats fine, nobody is taking issue with that. She can continue to do that even.. BUT her employer can fire her for undermining them which is what is happening. Has nothing to do with free speech. Free speech does not mean you are free from consequences at work. If I say hurtful things about my coworkers thats free speech, but my arse is probably fired for that.
Posted on 7/22/25 at 10:59 am to Cell of Awareness
She should be treated as someone who has committed treason. Both of them.
Posted on 7/22/25 at 11:10 am to Cell of Awareness
quote:
in which she has minority shares.
Curious to know if she disclosed this to the DOJ already? If not, more rationale for dismissal.
Posted on 7/22/25 at 11:11 am to Scruffy
quote:
What part of her being fired is she confused about?
Govt workers, not that bright
Posted on 7/22/25 at 11:14 am to Cell of Awareness
"conflict of interest" Your fired.....
Posted on 7/22/25 at 11:16 am to Cell of Awareness
Private or Gov't Sector your arse is getting fired if you profit from an app that hinders your employer from doing their job or providing their service.
She's running to the media looking for sympathy from morons and dipshits because she has no legal recourse.
She's running to the media looking for sympathy from morons and dipshits because she has no legal recourse.
Posted on 7/22/25 at 11:21 am to udtiger
quote:
So if I intentionally out an undercover cop in front of a cartel leader knowing he ends up getting put in a woodchipper, I have no criminal culpability?
You know they had to make specific laws for this specific scenario, right?
That makes them non-applicable to this general discussion, since they understood that in order to combat this highly specific scenario, a specific law was needed.
Posted on 7/22/25 at 11:22 am to Havoc
quote:
So why would legal immigrants have a use for the iceblock app?
An irrelevant question for the 1A discussion.
Why would non-speeding drivers have a use for that function in Waze?
This post was edited on 7/22/25 at 11:23 am
Posted on 7/22/25 at 11:27 am to ForeverEllisHugh
quote:Tell us that you have not worked for the government without telling us that you have not worked for the government.
The app is free speech deal with it.
Such service comes at the sacrifice of many of your rights.
Posted on 7/22/25 at 11:28 am to ForeverEllisHugh
quote:
The app is free speech deal with it.
Anyone say anything about the app being cut off?
But if you are a federal employee.. you are required to disclose any outside employment you may be involved in and apparently she just forgot that she was a partner in an app that undermines federal law enforcement…. While working in federal law enforcement.
Posted on 7/22/25 at 11:38 am to Cell of Awareness
quote:
A device to stalk or track is not free speech. Particularly when that information is being provided to hinder an active investigation. And it is possibly a violation of 18 U.S.C. 1512(c),
I’d think she’d end up with a violation of 18 U.S.C. 111; interfering with Federal Law Enforcement, especially the following -
Interference with Agency Functions:
This can involve violating lawful orders from law enforcement or intentionally interfering with their operations.
Posted on 7/22/25 at 11:50 am to Cell of Awareness
Educated and dumb
Posted on 7/22/25 at 11:51 am to ForeverEllisHugh
quote:
The app is free speech deal with it.
Do yall take being dumb as a challenge or a badge of accomplishment?
Posted on 7/22/25 at 12:03 pm to Tiger Prawn
quote:
The dildo of consequences rarely arrives lubed
Best one liner I have read in a very long time. You win!!!
Posted on 7/22/25 at 12:05 pm to Cell of Awareness
quote:
app that warns users when the feds are closing in.
This may be a controversial statement, but I think we need this app for all of the Fed departments.
This post was edited on 7/22/25 at 1:14 pm
Posted on 7/22/25 at 12:10 pm to ForeverEllisHugh
quote:
The app is free speech deal with it.
Free speech has consequences.
And she is already dealing with it
Posted on 7/22/25 at 12:12 pm to Cell of Awareness
quote:
Feinstein
This should tell you everything you need to know already
Posted on 7/22/25 at 12:58 pm to ForeverEllisHugh
It's obstruction of justice, you moron
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News