- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Cheating marathoner busted by high-res picture of her Garmin fitness tracker
Posted on 2/26/17 at 11:43 pm
Posted on 2/26/17 at 11:43 pm
LINK
quote:
Hot tip: If you're going to cheat while running a marathon, don't wear a fitness tracking band.
A New York food writer found this out the hard way on Tuesday after she was busted for an elaborate run-faking scheme, in which she attempted to use doctored data to back up an illegitimate finish time. In an apologetic Instagram post that was eventually deleted, 24-year-old runner Jane Seo admitted to cutting the course at the Fort Lauderdale A1A Half Marathon.
An independent marathon-running investigator (yes, that's a thing) named Derek Murphy posted his elaborate analysis of Seo's scheme, and the findings revolved almost entirely around data derived from Seo's Garmin 235 fitness tracker. Suspicions over her second-place finish in the half marathon began after very limited data about her podium-placing run was posted to the Strava fitness-tracking service. The data only listed a distance and completion time, as opposed to more granular statistics. (This followed the release of Seo's official completion times, which showed her running remarkably faster in the half marathon's later stages.)
Things got weirder when Seo eventually posted a "complete," GPS-tracked run of the half-marathon course. Its time-stamp looked suspiciously off, Murphy noted in his own report, so he dug up older run-data posts from her same account and noticed starkly different heart rate and cadence stats in her newer report. "The cadence data [of the half marathon] is more consistent with what you would expect on a bike ride, not a run," Murphy wrote.
From there, Murphy began poking around official photos from the event and found one of Seo smiling with a second-place award around her neck—and a clearly visible Garmin 235 screen on her wrist. He paid for a higher-resolution version of the photos, and they showed a running-distance tally on the wrist hardware's screen: 11.65 miles. Even factoring in a margin of error, that measure is well short of a half marathon's 13.1 mile total.
![]()
This post was edited on 2/27/17 at 1:24 pm
Posted on 2/26/17 at 11:45 pm to Street Hawk
1. Did not know independent marathon-running investigators existed
2. Really? Murphy began poking around official photos from the event and found one of Seo smiling with a second-place award around her neck—and a clearly visible Garmin 235 screen on her wrist. He paid for a higher-resolution version of the photos, and they showed a running-distance tally on the wrist hardware's screen: 11.65 miles. Even factoring in a margin of error, that measure is well short of a half marathon's 13.1 mile total.
3. What does this due other than ruin a person's credibility and bump everyone else up a spot on the leaderboard?
2. Really? Murphy began poking around official photos from the event and found one of Seo smiling with a second-place award around her neck—and a clearly visible Garmin 235 screen on her wrist. He paid for a higher-resolution version of the photos, and they showed a running-distance tally on the wrist hardware's screen: 11.65 miles. Even factoring in a margin of error, that measure is well short of a half marathon's 13.1 mile total.
3. What does this due other than ruin a person's credibility and bump everyone else up a spot on the leaderboard?
Posted on 2/26/17 at 11:46 pm to Street Hawk
Dang, asians will cheat at anything.
Posted on 2/26/17 at 11:46 pm to Street Hawk
I've decided that a marathon investigator is equally as lame as someone who would cheat running a marathon.
Posted on 2/26/17 at 11:50 pm to Street Hawk
If monetary awards are not involved and the marathon is just purely for fun and competition, why would anyone waste time and money "investigating" a glorified track race?
Posted on 2/26/17 at 11:52 pm to Sentrius
quote:
If monetary awards are not involved and the marathon is just purely for fun and competition, why would anyone waste time and money "investigating" a glorified track race?
It's a sporting competition, you dumb motherfricker.
Posted on 2/26/17 at 11:53 pm to Sentrius
quote:
If monetary awards are not involved and the marathon is just purely for fun and competition, why would anyone waste time and money "investigating" a glorified track race?
I guess you think they shouldn't have corrected the best picture frick up either?
Posted on 2/26/17 at 11:55 pm to Street Hawk
Good lord. People are so damn serious about running a stupid race?
So much that they have independent investigators?
Look...we get it. You're in shape and you jog.
I swear, some people are as bad as vegans. It's a damn hobby. What's the point of cheating even? Running has to be the lamest sport ever.
They should make it interesting and have the runners get chased by bears or something.
So much that they have independent investigators?
Look...we get it. You're in shape and you jog.
I swear, some people are as bad as vegans. It's a damn hobby. What's the point of cheating even? Running has to be the lamest sport ever.
They should make it interesting and have the runners get chased by bears or something.
Posted on 2/26/17 at 11:56 pm to Sentrius
quote:
If monetary awards are not involved and the marathon is just purely for fun and competition, why would anyone waste time and money "investigating" a glorified track race?
Because it protects those that actually did run the entire race. It be more inclined to agree with you if the woman did not steal a podium spot from someone. Hell, I'd be pissed if I trained for the race, ran the whole thing, then found out some douche cheated their way in front of me.
This post was edited on 2/26/17 at 11:57 pm
Posted on 2/26/17 at 11:56 pm to Street Hawk
Maybe she has a long stride.
Posted on 2/27/17 at 12:03 am to Street Hawk
She did it for the Instagram pic.
Posted on 2/27/17 at 12:18 am to Pico de Gallo
quote:
What does this due other than ruin a person's credibility and bump everyone else up a spot on the leaderboard?
1. she ruined her own credibility
2. it will hopefully deter would be cheaters in the future
3. frick cheaters
4. frick cheaters
5. frick you for taking up for cheaters
This post was edited on 2/27/17 at 12:20 am
Posted on 2/27/17 at 12:23 am to Sentrius
quote:why don't you use the same logic to ask why the frick would she then cheat?
If monetary awards are not involved and the marathon is just purely for fun and competition, why would anyone waste time and money "investigating" a glorified track race?
Posted on 2/27/17 at 12:35 am to Street Hawk
fricks. Where are they? I can't find them.
Posted on 2/27/17 at 12:41 am to Street Hawk
Does this mean she doesn't get to put the 13.1 sticker on the back of her car like the rest of the douches who are proud about half way completing something?
Posted on 2/27/17 at 12:48 am to Street Hawk
I don't care what kind of contest it is, if someone cheats then frick them. Competing is competing
Popular
Back to top

32













