Started By
Message

re: California to shutdown $2.2 billion solar plant that never lived up to its promises

Posted on 9/24/25 at 8:42 pm to
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
16329 posts
Posted on 9/24/25 at 8:42 pm to
quote:

capacity factor.

We need a Clames capacity factor drinking game but it might lead to alcohol poisoning.
Posted by MardiGrasCajun
Dirty Coast, MS
Member since Sep 2005
5911 posts
Posted on 9/24/25 at 8:44 pm to
quote:


I’m also curious of the source of that 500,000,000 per year number. That seems exorbitantly high.


It’s actually closer to 600 million. Maybe more. I have a home office with four 5x8 single window panes. Birds smack into them all the time. They’re usually ok but occasionally they’re stunned and lay on the ground for a while. If they were to hit a tall building they’d be dead when they hit the ground.

Mortality rate is the median value calculated from an estimate range in 2017.
Hazard
Deaths per year
Contribution to total deaths

Cats
2,400,000,000
1 in 1.4

Collisions - Building Glass
599,000,000
1 in 5.5

Collisions - Vehicles
214,500,000
1 in 15.5

Poison
72,000,000
1 in 46.2

Collisions - Electrical lines
25,500,000
1 in 130.4

Collisions - Communication towers
6,600,000
1 in 503.7

Electrocutions
5,600,000
1 in 593.6

Oil pits
750,000
1 in 4,432.1

Collisions - Onshore Wind Turbines
234,012
1 in 14,205.2
Source: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (2017)
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
18796 posts
Posted on 9/24/25 at 8:45 pm to
quote:

That’s not because of the wholesale price. Probably because they’re having to cover for all the other expensive shite that they haven’t been maintaining for years.


The area I live in is actively converting farm land into PV installations, doesn't seem to stop the utilities from passing rate increases every year then coming back later stating yet another round of rate increases will be needed.
This post was edited on 9/24/25 at 8:48 pm
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
18796 posts
Posted on 9/24/25 at 8:47 pm to
quote:

We need a Clames capacity factor drinking game but it might lead to alcohol poisoning.


You can bury your head all you want, but the math doesn't lie...
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
22581 posts
Posted on 9/24/25 at 8:48 pm to
quote:

Glass windows kill another 500 million birds per year.


You got a link?

And lol at overall cats vs birds numbers
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
16329 posts
Posted on 9/24/25 at 8:48 pm to
quote:

The area I live in is actively converting farm land into PV installations, doesn't seem to stop the utilities from passing rate increases every year then comimg back later stating yet another round of rate increases will be needed.

Yep, but it ain’t from that $1.15/Wp solar farm.
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
16329 posts
Posted on 9/24/25 at 8:49 pm to
quote:

You can bury your head all you want, but the math doesn't lie...

My head is far from buried. Remember, I actually do this for a living. I use CF as part of a much larger equation that controls for all the other variables you don’t understand that impact energy pricing.
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
22581 posts
Posted on 9/24/25 at 8:50 pm to
quote:

The area I live in is actively converting farm land into PV installations, doesn't seem to stop the utilities from passing rate increases every year then coming back later stating yet another round of rate increases will be needed.


It’s not a cheaper energy source at the moment. A lot worse actually
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
87176 posts
Posted on 9/24/25 at 8:56 pm to
quote:

It's an older solar farm
It’s not a solar farm. Not a single solar panel on the site. It uses mirrors to direct the sun to a single point on top of a tower that is filled with water. Water boils. Steam. Powers a turbine. Electricity.
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
35734 posts
Posted on 9/24/25 at 9:06 pm to
quote:

That's just a dumb statement. It did produce what it was projected to produce. After the first couple of years It was producing over 90% of projected capacity


You sure about that?

quote:

A notable example is the Ivanpah Solar Project, a $2.2 billion solar thermal facility in the Mojave Desert, which has struggled to meet energy production expectations and has had significant environmental impacts, including the annual incineration of thousands of birds. Despite federal support and initial optimism about solar thermal technology’s potential for baseload power, Ivanpah never exceeded 75% of its planned electricity output and continues to depend on natural gas to operate. PG&E recently announced it would stop purchasing power from Ivanpah, signaling the project’s shutdown well before its planned 2039 closure.


LINK

ChatGPT and I’m on my phone so not posting all the links and excerpts but here’s the recap.

quote:

Its expected output (capacity factor) was originally projected to be around 27–30% of capacity. In practice, it has usually operated well below that: • In its first full year (2014), Ivanpah only achieved about ~19% capacity factor. • In subsequent years, it improved somewhat, but generally averaged in the ~20–25% range, still below initial projections. • For comparison: in 2015, it produced about 653,000 MWh (roughly 19% capacity factor). In some later years it crept closer to 25%. So, to answer simply: ?? The Ivanpah plant has usually operated at around 20–25% of its expected capacity, which is lower than the ~30% originally forecast.



This post was edited on 9/24/25 at 9:10 pm
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
18796 posts
Posted on 9/24/25 at 9:07 pm to
quote:

It’s not a cheaper energy source at the moment. A lot worse actually


Oh i know it isn't, and one good hail storm will probably be another excuse piled on among the others. Elon Musk is promising a large PV installation to support the Memphis-area supercomputing ventures. Like the gas-turbines they are currently relying on, the promise includes using a portion of what's generated to be fed back into the local grid for residents. Contrary to what some might think, I'm not against PV and will probably have a few for my outdoor storage shed and eventual shop, but I'm not deluding myself with what PV is able to deliver vs what is promised.
Posted by Zappas Stache
Utility Muffin Research Kitchen
Member since Apr 2009
42252 posts
Posted on 9/24/25 at 11:30 pm to
quote:

ChatGPT and I’m on my phone so not posting all the links and excerpts but here’s the recap.


Thats your problem , ChatGPT will pull in a lot of eroneous and false info and present it to you as fact.

The first 2 years of operating (2014 and 15), Ivanpah started pretty bad but by year 3 was at 77% of projected capacity of 940,000MWh and continued to improve over the next 5 years and reached 91% capacity.


quote:

Ivanpah was advertised as designed to produce 940,000 MWh of electricity per year, based on its nameplate capacity and assumed capacity factor.[90] In its second year of operation, Ivanpah's production of 653,122 MWh of net electricity was 69.5 percent of this value, ramping up from 44.6 percent in the first year. The commissioning of a new thermal plants requires up to four years to achieve 100% operating level, from the first grid connection to full production.[91] In its seventh year (2020), the annual production was 91.1% of its advertised value.


This post was edited on 9/24/25 at 11:37 pm
Posted by Kingpenm3
Xanadu
Member since Aug 2011
9740 posts
Posted on 9/24/25 at 11:48 pm to
quote:

I was actually one of the lead engineers on this project. Seems like so long ago.


What went differently than you planned? Did you expect the mirrors to compete with solar panels in efficiency?
Posted by Bourre
Da Parish
Member since Nov 2012
22909 posts
Posted on 9/25/25 at 7:10 am to
quote:

You’re good with our governments spending $2B+ for something that lasts less time than a FDR presidency?


Of course he is… leftist only care about virtue signaling and feels, not practicality and efficiency
Posted by dnm3305
Member since Feb 2009
15794 posts
Posted on 9/25/25 at 7:16 am to
The people in charge so all of the money granted for this was appropriately laundered to it’s proper recipients, which was the intent all along.

Same thing with the railway system. Same thing with the reservoirs that don’t hold water. Soaking up that government money like a hoover vacuum.
Posted by Tigeralum2008
Yankees Fan
Member since Apr 2012
17599 posts
Posted on 9/25/25 at 7:37 am to
I’m not mad we tried something new. That’s how innovation goes sometimes.

I’d rather live in a society that swings for the fences by developing novel ideas.

The USA is the only country to land people on the moon for a reason
Posted by AUin02
Member since Jan 2012
4506 posts
Posted on 9/25/25 at 7:44 am to
A few reasons.

1 Cats and windows aren't new, they're just kind of here and have been for quite some time.

2 Wind farms at least (unsure of this solar farm) tend to kill a much higher % of raptors, birds that reproduce in much lower quantities and exist in much lower quantities than the typical window strike or cat death, which are almost wholly songbirds.
Posted by Corinthians420
Iowa
Member since Jun 2022
16104 posts
Posted on 9/25/25 at 7:50 am to
Posted by terriblegreen
Souf Badden Rewage
Member since Aug 2011
11823 posts
Posted on 9/25/25 at 8:17 am to
quote:

I never understood this argument. Cats kill 1-4 billion birds per year. Glass windows kill another 500 million birds per year.


I kill about 50 a year.
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
72607 posts
Posted on 9/25/25 at 8:33 am to
quote:

Kind of hard to beat the 44 quadrillion watts the earth gets blasted with every day from the sun.
WATTS?????

first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram