Started By
Message

re: Blood tests show hundreds of Georgians charged with DUI were sober

Posted on 4/8/26 at 5:55 pm to
Posted by Smeg
Member since Aug 2018
15892 posts
Posted on 4/8/26 at 5:55 pm to
A bunch of the field sobriety tests could easily be failed by a person who is stone cold sober. That's the problem.
Posted by STLDawg
The Lou
Member since Apr 2015
4603 posts
Posted on 4/8/26 at 5:55 pm to
It was never about safety, just revenue generation
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
151278 posts
Posted on 4/8/26 at 6:49 pm to
quote:

I don’t mind a night in jail that allows me to sue the arresting org and collect.
lol good luck with that. I tried. I was informed I couldn’t prove that I wasn’t impaired that night and should be glad charges were dropped.

And on top of that, during that time when I was trying to get compensated for the money that came out of my pocket, I got pulled over by the same department for having an interior dome light in my car on at night. I got maced straight in the face but then allowed to pull off and drive away half blind, with no ticket
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
18841 posts
Posted on 4/8/26 at 6:56 pm to
Typical collect and serve LEO.
Posted by Lou Loomis
A pond. Ponds good for you.
Member since Mar 2025
2100 posts
Posted on 4/8/26 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

Google " Kanasa two-step".


They all got in huge trouble for that so they can’t do that anymore. Ya think that will stop them? Hell no!

The cops are not your friends! Do not talk to them, and never do any field sobriety tests. It’s so unconstitutional that you don’t have the right to refuse them without being automatically guilty of DUI. That’s not due process. frickin bullshite!
Posted by Combaro01
Member since Mar 2024
236 posts
Posted on 6/16/26 at 11:42 pm to
This is absolutely messed up. I've heard about cops doing this where they just arrest everyone and hope the blood test comes back with something. When the breathalyzer is 0.00 they just say 'must be on drugs' and push for DUI anyway. That's exactly what happened to me a couple years ago. I blew 0.00 on the breathalyzer and the cop still arrested me saying I was 'obviously impaired' and had to be on drugs.

My case went through the system for months before the blood test finally came back clean with nothing at all. I was lucky I had a good lawyer who knew how to fight this. Indiana criminal defense lawyer Wruble Law helped me out when I was dealing with similar stuff where cops were arresting people with 0.00 breath tests. They know how to work with toxicology reports and prove the police were wrong.

This Georgia situation is way bigger than I thought though. 701 people in one year with clean blood tests? That's systemic corruption at this point. Cops need to stop just arresting everyone and hoping something shows up in the test.
This post was edited on 7/6/26 at 9:00 am
Posted by RajFromBengaliLand
Member since Jun 2026
22 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 12:44 am to
quote:

So they dont even bother with the dogs anymore? Now they just make shite up and take you to jail.
In India you negotiate. Never drive a scooti or rickshaw without a few 100 rupee notes tucked away.
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
11473 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 3:15 am to
quote:

This Georgia situation is way bigger than I thought though. 701 people in one year with clean blood tests? That's systemic corruption at this point. Cops need to stop just arresting everyone and hoping something shows up in the test.


Its 701 out of almost 7000, so a little less than 10%. That's too high of a number. But there are going to be misses if we are going to enforce DUI laws. With weed basically legalized and other drug usage, how do you identify those using? If you suspect (there are indicators), how do you test them?

We need better, faster testing that is more accurate. I guess blood draws are the most effective at this point. So I think the system worked in these cases, with the cases dropped. What more should these people get?
Posted by supadave3
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2005
32344 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 5:57 am to
quote:

Adderall, Ambien, Trazadone, Zoloft are just a few examples. Go


I don’t take it anymore but that used to worry me when I took after all every morning. Could I get a DWI for just driving to work after taking a prescribed med? Apparently so.

That’s also my biggest concern with THC gummies. If I take one on Friday, it’ll still show up in a blood test on Monday. Would I be prosecuted?
This post was edited on 6/17/26 at 5:59 am
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
12866 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 7:10 am to
quote:

by Combaro01

That account is suspect as frick. Multiple bumps of months-old posts with subtle references to various businesses. Every post reads like AI.
Posted by Meauxjeaux
102836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
47337 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 7:26 am to
quote:

There is no reason why they have to arrest the person right there. They can take down the information and continue investigating it and then get a warrant once they have evidence.


???

In a traffic stop with suspicion of impairment?

Take down what info? Warrant for what? Arresting right then is the only play if the officer suspects impairment. He can’t let an impaired driver drive off.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
37653 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 7:27 am to
quote:

all forms of prescription and illegal drugs.

There’s a long list of commonly prescribed drugs that get flagged in those blood tests. Adderall, Ambien, Trazadone, Zoloft are just a few examples. Go randomly test 100 people on the streets and you will find a significant number legally prescribed at least one medication on that list. They also get lumped into that 90% positive category. It doesn’t mean they were impaired.



Aren't 40% of women on antidepressants? The idea that they are impaired...

Nevermind
Posted by forkedintheroad
Member since Feb 2025
2627 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 7:36 am to
quote:

The State has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that they were above the legal limit at the time of the incident.


If the level is high enough at the time of the test, they can show it is statistically improbable that it wasn't over the limit at the time of the accident, which is more than enough to cover reasonable doubt.
Posted by Meauxjeaux
102836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
47337 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 7:41 am to
quote:

The biggest frick you is that your DL will be suspended if you refuse.

yep, and I don't get how that stands up, the explanation is that "it's a contract you signed with the state when you got your drivers license," it's like you're being punished for not willingly assisting to incriminate yourself


You all are properly asserting all this bullshite to your elected legislators and not the cops, right?
Posted by chinhoyang
Member since Jun 2011
26207 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 8:01 am to
quote:

Nothing wrong with the prosecution arguing that. Person was drinking, someone was killed while they were driving and the bac lowered during the time it took to take the test.

We’d need to know the figures, actual time and clearance rate


This kind of prosecution is not that rare, especially when there has been a fatal accident. They are difficult for the prosecution to prove because you have to have an expert on the clearance rate issue.
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
151278 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 8:07 am to
Had this exact scenario happen to me. Cops were complete mouth breathing inbred dicks.

Blew 0.0
Said they were arresting me anyway.
Requested a blood test.
They took me to jail.
Spent 3 nights before I could bond out with a credit card using a bail bonds.
Lost my job for not showing up to work.
Got a letter in the mail a couple days later saying blood test came back clean and all charges were dropped

True story
Posted by LemmyLives
Texas
Member since Mar 2019
17220 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 8:20 am to
quote:

Back the blue, motherfrickers

MADD hysteria took over the country. More excessive bullshite brought to you by nervous women. What were their legislative priorities for 2025?
quote:

All-offender ignition interlocks: Require ignition interlocks for all drunk drivers for a minimum of six months and close loopholes that allow offenders to avoid this device

.05 BAC: Lower illegal blood alcohol concentration (BAC) from .08 to .05

High-visibility enforcement of impaired driving laws and equitable traffic safety enforcement:
Prioritize funding and resource allocation aimed at equitable enforcement of hazardous driving behavior (e.g., impaired driving and speeding) and encourage states to use Federal Section 1906 Racial Profiling Prohibition Grants to develop and implement programs, public outreach and training to
reduce the disparate impact of traffic stops
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram