- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
molsusports
| Favorite team: | Ohio State |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | lsu alum |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 37847 |
| Registered on: | 7/11/2004 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: You can see everything
Posted by molsusports on 10/28/26 at 3:58 pm to Bert Macklin FBI
Vaporware refers to software that never materialized after heavy hype and investment.
Some of the apologists for Holmes would blame Sunny claiming he came from the Silicon Valley mindset where exceptional claims and hype were part of the business strategy to get rich quick.
I think Nathan was focused less on the nuts and bolts of proving fraud than diving into the mentality of Elizabeth and her husband. I think it does work out to be a fascinating study of deception. They are still playing the game as if no fraud existed and undoubtedly they hoped the documentary would convince people in the public that they were innocent of wrongdoing.
Should he have cut more in the first half and included a 5-10 minute rebuttal by Tyler Shultz? Yes. There will be people who don't know how viscous Elizabeth and Sunny were to the honest employees who tried to blow the whistle on their wrongdoing. There will be people who think Elizabeth is the victim rather than the villain.
Some of the apologists for Holmes would blame Sunny claiming he came from the Silicon Valley mindset where exceptional claims and hype were part of the business strategy to get rich quick.
I think Nathan was focused less on the nuts and bolts of proving fraud than diving into the mentality of Elizabeth and her husband. I think it does work out to be a fascinating study of deception. They are still playing the game as if no fraud existed and undoubtedly they hoped the documentary would convince people in the public that they were innocent of wrongdoing.
Should he have cut more in the first half and included a 5-10 minute rebuttal by Tyler Shultz? Yes. There will be people who don't know how viscous Elizabeth and Sunny were to the honest employees who tried to blow the whistle on their wrongdoing. There will be people who think Elizabeth is the victim rather than the villain.
re: You can see everything
Posted by molsusports on 10/28/26 at 2:07 pm to Bert Macklin FBI
quote:
100% agree. She had a device that she truly believed in but she needed more funding to make it work. So she faked a test here and there to get to the next stage fully believing that eventually the device would work as intended and all would be well. The issue is that she kept growing and it kept failing. At some point she had to realize the device was FAR from being the working product she promised and that she would have to fake it for the long haul. Thats the fraud. Her choices were to admit it didn't work and funding slows and progress slows OR lie and try to chase her tail. She chose to lie.
I think a lot of tech start ups use this same plan to continue to get funding. the issue is that when Uber isn't working like they claim it should someone is just late to their function. When her product didn't work, people were put in danger
It would have been interesting if Nathan had used the term vaporware as part of the questioning of development and motives.
re: You can see everything
Posted by molsusports on 10/28/26 at 12:31 pm to Bert Macklin FBI
quote:
I hate to be political because I think both sides have their faults but I think she preyed on the woke mind hive. They WANTED/NEEDED a woman to be the next Steve Jobs
There was some of that. And at the early stages of the scandal the Holmes team did lean hard into the defense that she was only being attacked because she was a successful female billionaire.
But mostly this was a fraud story propelled by media hype and Elizabeth's combination of drive and ruthlessness.
During the trial the Elizabeth team attempted to shift all responsibility for the fraud onto Sunny. It would have been interesting if Nathan had asked what Sunny was guilty of and how he deceived her. My guess is we would have seen tears rather than real answers.
re: TV cast mates who didn't get along
Posted by molsusports on 10/28/26 at 10:11 am to Funky Tide 8
quote:
Bill Murray wouldn't film scenes with him in Caddyshack they hated each other so much and everyone loves Bill Murray.
Apparently Murray was a dick and kind of a mess during the shooting for Groundhog's Day. Him and Ramis were good friends before making the movie, and that ended after. The groundhog didn't even like Murray during the shoot-it bit him multiple times.
Bill Murray has a long list of former costars who hate him including Richard Dreyfuss, Carol Kane, Harold Ramos, and Chevy Chase.
Chevy is just a douche but Dreyfuss and Ramis were Bill issues. Murray has a long list of those
re: You can see everything
Posted by molsusports on 10/28/26 at 9:56 am to Civildawg
quote:
After watching and having experience with a person like that, I'm in the camp that she honestly didn't try to mislead people
That's what I would have come away with if it weren't for knowing things about the Theranos scandal that weren't in the movie.
An autistic defense with literal word choices being the problem doesn't cause the person to do things like directly lie about machine capabilities.
They had exceptionally aggressive nondisclosure legal paperwork that they used punitively to prevent their employees from going rogue and disclosing the fraud.
Tyler Shultz has a number of extended interviews from his position as an insider who became a whistle blower. Even coming from a famous, wealthy, and powerful family did not save him from exceptional pressure. There were many other people who were crushed by Elizabeth and Sunni.
If people have not watched the earlier interviews with Tyler or read Bad Blood I totally get why her implausible explanations seem plausible. Tyler described many a time when she could take you g scientists who understood the technology better than she did and turn them into advocates for months at a time. Until the technology failed over and over.
re: You can see everything
Posted by molsusports on 10/27/26 at 11:01 pm to Sam Quint
quote:
I think Elizabeth Holmes knew what she was doing all along and she still does. I think Billy is 100% being used for his family money and connections. She saw in him exactly what he is - narcissist who will go to any lengths to be in the spotlight and be the hero - and she’s letting him play that part so that she will have access to his money. I think she is a 100% predator.
I waffled badly during the movie but eventually ended up here.
Billy is a douche of exceptionally high order though. The fact that he has power of attorney while she is in prison is the part that leaves some doubt.
However there can be no reasonable doubt that she understands the issues that she pretends not to understand (about the fraud Theranos perpetrated.). Who's on first is ultimately not a credible defense for misrepresenting your company's ability to perform diagnostic tests. In reading the Bad Blood book it was also eminently obvious she deliberately and vigorously perpetuated the fraud and concealed the technical malfeasance.
There were moments of high stress where I think Elizabeth shows the effects of deception in specific physical ways. Her face becomes locked in a not quite smile. Her nose and her cheeks also flush, sometimes intensely (resembling the cirrhotic red nose of an alcoholic). In a bizarre way her facial features resemble something like the intense whites and reds with a fixed artificial smile that you see portrayed in a Ringling Brothers Circus Clown, Howdy Doody, or even Ronald McDonald. I stared pretty intensely at those features during the long pauses in Nathan's conversations with her. There has to be some sort of literature about the mixture of excitement, joy, fear, and delight exemplified by clowns but portrayed by a Elizabeth involuntarily.
That facial expression was not natural but she sure paints an exceptional picture with it. Men and women alike fell victim to her charm in a way that doesn't make sense until you clock that she may be one of the most gifted liars and charmers to ever walk the Earth. The convincing nature with which she claims she will not financially benefit is exponentially better than the best George Costanza ever mustered.
re: Has a sports franchise truly broken you?
Posted by molsusports on 10/27/26 at 5:34 pm to TexasTiger08
I'll show my age here but the NHL broke my Blues fandom nearly completely when they punished the Blues for a free agent signing by awarding the New Jersey Devils Scott Stevens.
The Blues were on the cusp of finally breaking through their glass ceiling. They had Brett Hull, Adam Oates, Curtis Joseph, but Scott Stevens was the force on the team that made them dangerous when things got serious in the playoffs.
Then the Blues signed Brendan Shannahan before he was Brendan Shannahan. The NHL arbitrator awarded the Devils Steven's who would be the backbone of three Stanley Cup teams in the following dozen seasons. Shannahan, Hull, and Joseph would eventually leave the Blues and win Stanley Cups for other teams. Shannahan didn't develop into the kind of player Stevens already was for years (if ever). Take Stevens from the Devils and they win zero Stanley Cups. Put him back on the Blues and they get at least a couple.
As a young fan I knew what I was seeing. It was punishment from the league for signing an expensive contract. The punishment was a strategic removal of the most important young player for future playoff success.
The Blues were never the same in the 90s. It was over and it wasn't worth investing my time watching after the summer of 1991 for years to follow.
The Blues were on the cusp of finally breaking through their glass ceiling. They had Brett Hull, Adam Oates, Curtis Joseph, but Scott Stevens was the force on the team that made them dangerous when things got serious in the playoffs.
Then the Blues signed Brendan Shannahan before he was Brendan Shannahan. The NHL arbitrator awarded the Devils Steven's who would be the backbone of three Stanley Cup teams in the following dozen seasons. Shannahan, Hull, and Joseph would eventually leave the Blues and win Stanley Cups for other teams. Shannahan didn't develop into the kind of player Stevens already was for years (if ever). Take Stevens from the Devils and they win zero Stanley Cups. Put him back on the Blues and they get at least a couple.
As a young fan I knew what I was seeing. It was punishment from the league for signing an expensive contract. The punishment was a strategic removal of the most important young player for future playoff success.
The Blues were never the same in the 90s. It was over and it wasn't worth investing my time watching after the summer of 1991 for years to follow.
re: 9 game sec schedule is more fun for fans
Posted by molsusports on 10/27/26 at 3:10 pm to 3down10
quote:
you can do 8 conference games and 2 P4 OOC games like Alabama and a few others were trying to make happen without a mathematical penalty on the conference.
This is my preferred outcome
It avoids the uneven number of home vs road SEC games and allows more interesting out of conference big name games.
The idea of the SEC and Big 10 doing two game series based on the prior couple of years conference standings is very cool. With two ooc games mandated you can do that at the start of the year and keep your other rivalry games against Clemson, FSU, Ga Tech or what have you
re: Colton Nussmeier
Posted by molsusports on 10/27/26 at 7:15 am to LuckyTiger57
Best of luck to him
re: Do you think WB is making a big mistake keeping that release date for Dune 3?
Posted by molsusports on 10/26/26 at 8:50 pm to RLDSC FAN
I am very interested in seeing Dune. Eventually I want to see the Doomsday movie but it isn't important to me that it is in IMAX or even in the theater. Doomsday will be a jammed movie with CGI more than scenery and the plot has already undermined some of the better character arcs from the earlier Avengers movies.
Anyway, to answer the OP. Probably not. The big value for Dune is what they gobble up in the Christmas and New Year range. If they move it I think they lose more than they gain.
I'm also very curious whether Doomsday will have the appeal that Spiderman has had. It feels like the Russo brothers are doing an Expendables rip off with Tony Stark as the big baddie
Anyway, to answer the OP. Probably not. The big value for Dune is what they gobble up in the Christmas and New Year range. If they move it I think they lose more than they gain.
I'm also very curious whether Doomsday will have the appeal that Spiderman has had. It feels like the Russo brothers are doing an Expendables rip off with Tony Stark as the big baddie
re: Sankey’s Vendetta against LSU runs deep. Expect several things to happen going forward
Posted by molsusports on 10/25/26 at 11:19 pm to Lonnie Utah
quote:
Sankey is so mad at LSU that he's going to put Arkansas on probation for 3 years...
Did that happen ten years ago?
re: Sort of looking like Georgia may be only school to end up with less than 3 losses?
Posted by molsusports on 10/25/26 at 5:04 pm to RTRnFlorida
quote:
Because you think your Brand means something and it doesn’t. Thats what you were trying to say. Own it frick boy. You’re a trash liberal city with a school full of dot heads.
That escalated quickly
The Internet is an angry place
re: AP poll is out. Nine SEC teams in top 25.
Posted by molsusports on 10/25/26 at 1:15 pm to Eldodroptop
Welcome to 2026
I do think the top three teams (Miami, Ohio St, Georgia) are pretty good teams. I don't see any dominant teams without warts.
LSU among them will determine their fate with consecutive games against Alabama, Texas, and Tennessee.
I do think the top three teams (Miami, Ohio St, Georgia) are pretty good teams. I don't see any dominant teams without warts.
LSU among them will determine their fate with consecutive games against Alabama, Texas, and Tennessee.
re: Finally Got Around to Watching Sinners
Posted by molsusports on 10/25/26 at 10:13 am to PurpleandGold Motown
It did not exceed my expectations
It exceeded my preference for expectorations.
It exceeded my preference for expectorations.
re: 'Clayface' Discussion Thread: $43 Mil Opening Weekend
Posted by molsusports on 10/24/26 at 11:40 am to RLDSC FAN
That's too bad because it's pretty good for the genre.
I think it might accumulate a sort of cult movie following over time
I think it might accumulate a sort of cult movie following over time
re: First SEC coach to get canned?
Posted by molsusports on 10/23/26 at 10:55 pm to greygoose
quote:
putting my money on the darkhorse! Joey Freshwater! Another loss, or two, with all that money being put in will something to see! BOT, Boosters, and the fricking Governor putting hard stress on a dude that doesn't do well with stress, is going to be must-see TV!
Now that would be catastrophically stupid. Saban went.500 his first year at Alabama. Kirby went 8-5 at Georgia.
re: First SEC coach to get canned?
Posted by molsusports on 10/23/26 at 10:51 pm to VolsOut4Harambe
Beamer, Elko or Sark have to collapse to get fired. Drink isn't getting fired unless they do it the grounds of him resembling a bookish pederast.
I'm not sure anyone is fired after last year being a bloodbath
I'm not sure anyone is fired after last year being a bloodbath
re: Joel Klatt: SEC-Big Ten scheduling agreement expected once CFP expands to 24
Posted by molsusports on 10/23/26 at 10:38 pm to OleVaught14
I like the idea of this provided the SEC vs B10 games are scheduled in the first three weeks of the season. There are too many SEC teams with rivalry week and other out of conference rivals otherwise (Florida vs FSU and occasionally Miami, Georgia vs Ga Tech, USC vs Clemson, Kentucky vs Louisville, Missouri vs Kansas).
Overall I'd rather the SEC do an eight game conference schedule, the Big 10 game (should be a home and away series on consecutive years), and one other major conference opponent annually. That would give you a minimum of 10 power opponent games annually which matches the present SEC requirement (and would improve the B10 requirements if they stayed with 9 conference games and added the SEC ooc game).
Then you can have two filler teams and a two bye weeks for a 14 week schedule. The consequence of NIL has been a thinner depth and 9 SEC games without another bye is compounding the injury depth problem.
If you have a 14 week season the two byes could be staggered (NFL style) to have byes between the 4th and 12th weeks (staggered with the intention of having at least three premium matchups per week and allowing the two teams on bye to be rested for a big game on the week they return). Ideally, to make it fair, the two teams on the same bye week would face each other on their return game.
Overall I'd rather the SEC do an eight game conference schedule, the Big 10 game (should be a home and away series on consecutive years), and one other major conference opponent annually. That would give you a minimum of 10 power opponent games annually which matches the present SEC requirement (and would improve the B10 requirements if they stayed with 9 conference games and added the SEC ooc game).
Then you can have two filler teams and a two bye weeks for a 14 week schedule. The consequence of NIL has been a thinner depth and 9 SEC games without another bye is compounding the injury depth problem.
If you have a 14 week season the two byes could be staggered (NFL style) to have byes between the 4th and 12th weeks (staggered with the intention of having at least three premium matchups per week and allowing the two teams on bye to be rested for a big game on the week they return). Ideally, to make it fair, the two teams on the same bye week would face each other on their return game.
re: Do you respect people who take PTO “because they have it”
Posted by molsusports on 10/23/26 at 9:23 am to Mingo Was His NameO
Why don't you use your PTO?
Travel, golf, go boating or visit somewhere you want to see before you die
Travel, golf, go boating or visit somewhere you want to see before you die
re: 'Clayface' Discussion Thread: $43 Mil Opening Weekend
Posted by molsusports on 10/22/26 at 11:27 pm to RLDSC FAN
I saw it and Street Fighter after work today
Street Fighter was mediocre at best. Even by the low standards of the genre.
Clayface was enjoyable if you want a body horror comic themed movie. I would give it a positive ranking even if it isn't a masterpiece. Maybe a 7 out of 10.
I could see it having a niche group of fans who really love it
Street Fighter was mediocre at best. Even by the low standards of the genre.
Clayface was enjoyable if you want a body horror comic themed movie. I would give it a positive ranking even if it isn't a masterpiece. Maybe a 7 out of 10.
I could see it having a niche group of fans who really love it
re: The final screen tests for Bond are happening now. It's down to 4 actors
Posted by molsusports on 10/22/26 at 11:53 am to The Pirate King
quote:
Honestly, I've started to come around on Pattinson a bit if these are the other choices. I
Popular
0











