- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/4/22 at 11:24 pm to The Boat
quote:Think of it as the long-distance relationships of the particle physics world
Explain this to me like I'm 45 and don't know what quantum entanglements are.
Quantum entanglement explains how two subatomic particles can be linked to each other even if separated by billions of light-years of space. Despite their vast separation, a change induced in one particle will affect the other.
Posted on 10/5/22 at 12:33 am to L.A.
quote:
Think of it as the long-distance relationships of the particle physics world
Quantum entanglement explains how two subatomic particles can be linked to each other even if separated by billions of light-years of space. Despite their vast separation, a change induced in one particle will affect the other.
And in case anybody asks, this doesn't mean that instantaneous messages can be sent across the cosmos because you can't know how the particle will be changed until it happens. It's all just probabilities.
To share the info about how the particle changed, you'd have to send a message at the speed of light using radio waves or a laser, which would take a billion years if the particles were a billion light years apart. So no instantaneous or faster than light communication is possible.
Posted on 10/5/22 at 12:50 am to midcitycid
quote:
meh. it would be more impressive if they worked on Quantum Leap. PS--is it true the new quantum leap features a China-man?
Watch the first ten minutes of the new quantum leap for his explanation of quantum entanglements. Lol
And also, I think the proper nomenclature would be Asian-American (the character is Korean….not sure about the actor)
Posted on 10/5/22 at 1:47 am to L.A.
The American John Clauser did his work at Berkeley (of course
), and is still based in the Bay Area. Which means if we can get him to come to our game against Washington in a couple of weeks, we can pull out the "Nobel Prize! Nobel Prize!" chant like we did for George Smoot at the 2006 Oregon game.
https://vault.si.com/vault/2006/10/23/college-football


https://vault.si.com/vault/2006/10/23/college-football
quote:
Having rebounded from a season-opening blowout, QB Nate Longshore and Cal are pointing toward a showdown with USC
EVEN AT prestigious universities, "Nobel Prize! Nobel Prize!" isn't usually the chant of choice among rowdy football fans. But that was the congratulatory serenade that Cal physics professor George Smoot heard from the home student section at halftime of the Golden Bears' 45-24 victory over Oregon on Oct. 7. Four days earlier Smoot had won the Nobel Prize for physics for his research advancing the big bang theory of the universe's origins, a big bang far different from the one that shook the Bears' universe seven weeks ago: a 35-18 season-opening loss at Tennessee that blew their national reputation to bits.
Posted on 10/5/22 at 2:10 am to Langland
Wasn't there a study done in the 90's that dealt with somewhat thesame subject? I seem to recall them splitting or splicing a photon and manipulating only one half- which seemed to affect the other in the same manner no matter the distance.
Posted on 10/5/22 at 3:21 am to Diseasefreeforall
quote:
So no instantaneous or faster than light communication is possible.
Just fart in church and see how that works out.
Posted on 10/5/22 at 4:01 am to BigAppleTiger
This is the start of the galactic internet. But that will be decades down the road.
Posted on 10/5/22 at 4:07 am to The Boat
quote:
Explain this to me like I'm 45 and don't know what quantum entanglements are.
Looks like Midichlorians might be real
Posted on 10/5/22 at 4:30 am to L.A.
quote:
Quantum entanglement explains how two subatomic particles can be linked to each other even if separated by billions of light-years of space. Despite their vast separation, a change induced in one particle will affect the other
So there is another Cdawg out there in the universe typing a response to your post?
Posted on 10/5/22 at 5:02 am to Sir Richard Wright
Muh insurrection 

This post was edited on 10/5/22 at 5:30 am
Posted on 10/5/22 at 5:46 am to L.A.
I had to break up with a girlfriend due to a quantum entanglement.
Posted on 10/5/22 at 6:11 am to The Boat
quote:
Explain this to me like I'm 45 and don't know what quantum entanglements are.
I could be wrong, but I think it’s the phenomenon seen when you hand a 10 year old a fishing rod and then turn your back for one second.
This post was edited on 10/5/22 at 6:20 am
Posted on 10/5/22 at 7:11 am to L.A.
quote:
quantum entanglements
orgies?
Posted on 10/5/22 at 7:21 am to Diseasefreeforall
I would guess that particles a little closer would be studied.
I'm not sure how it all relates to more practical uses like quantum computing which companies like Google, Rigetti, and Northrop Grumman are working on. The subject of quantum is quite interesting as it kind of turns traditional physics on it's head. Quantum tunneling, etc will start to blow your mind, then there is quantum optics and the like.
I'm not sure how it all relates to more practical uses like quantum computing which companies like Google, Rigetti, and Northrop Grumman are working on. The subject of quantum is quite interesting as it kind of turns traditional physics on it's head. Quantum tunneling, etc will start to blow your mind, then there is quantum optics and the like.
Posted on 10/5/22 at 7:22 am to MorbidTheClown
quote:
orgies
.....on a subatomic level.
Posted on 10/5/22 at 7:24 am to L.A.
Do they answer the question of how the particles are entangled in the first place? And are particles unique to each other or can they become entangled with any like particle? And how do we know they are paired? It could be just another random particle with opposite spin that they are saying is entangled with the particle initially observed.
This post was edited on 10/5/22 at 7:28 am
Posted on 10/5/22 at 7:26 am to GumboPot
And that is why they are studying it.
Posted on 10/5/22 at 7:31 am to L.A.
Ok...it's a little dated...but still, the US kicks arse when it comes to Physicists.


Popular
Back to top
