Started By
Message

$1 Trillion Green Investment Matches Fossil Fuels For First Time

Posted on 1/29/23 at 9:23 am
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
21234 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 9:23 am
quote:

Global investments in the clean energy transition hit $1.1 trillion in 2022, roughly equal to the amount invested in fossil fuel production, the research firm said in its “Energy Transition Investment Trends 2023” report. Never before has the amount spent on switching to renewable power, electric cars and new energy sources like hydrogen topped $1 trillion.


quote:

Solar and wind power accounted for the biggest chunk of 2022 investments, reaching $495 billion, a 17% increase from the previous year. But electric vehicles came in close behind, with $466 billion, and the amount invested in them worldwide is growing far faster, at 54%. Nearly half of all global energy transition investments — $546 billion — were in China, while the US came in second at $141 billion. (Had BNEF counted the European Union as a single entity, it would have ranked second, with $180 billion.)

The $1.1 trillion covers money invested in deploying clean-energy technologies, according to BNEF. It does not include $274 billion spent worldwide last year on expanding and strengthening power grids, $79 billion invested in clean-energy supply chains and manufacturing or $119 billion in equity financing raised by clean-tech companies. Added together, the amount invested in the transition rises to about $1.6 trillion.



LINK
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64215 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 9:24 am to
Imagine if they used it on something that really worked like nuclear.
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
119144 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 9:25 am to
1.099T went to politicians pockets
Posted by Samso
nyc
Member since Jun 2013
4730 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 9:27 am to
quote:

Imagine if they used it on something that really worked like nuclear.


Was going to post the same thing
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51806 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 9:32 am to
One of these "investments" is not like the other.


One of them will actually produce tangible energy.
Posted by jaytothen
Member since Jan 2020
6407 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 9:41 am to
Invest more in green energy, CO2 emissions increases. Genius!
Posted by SingleMalt1973
Member since Feb 2022
11918 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 9:47 am to
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
11182 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 9:52 am to
quote:

Imagine if they used it on something that really worked like nuclear.

Carbon emissions would drop to basically nothing and then their excuse to use climate change to force political agendas would be negated.
Posted by DerkaDerka
Member since Jul 2016
1075 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 10:23 am to
quote:

Imagine if they used it on something that really worked like nuclear.



Molten Salt Reactors baby.
* Developed same time as LWR
* Runs at ambient pressure
* Intrinsically safe
* Can burn today's waste and warheads if desired. Orders of magnitude shorter half life.
* More thorough burn of feed
* higher temps = free desalinization plants and even hydrogen separation for fuel cell cars. Just pipe the heat to sister plants nearby.

That we won't do it tells me all I need to know about green energy. Its a grift.
This post was edited on 1/29/23 at 10:25 am
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
37503 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 10:25 am to
quote:

But electric vehicles came in close behind, with $466 billion


This isn’t a new energy source but rather a new energy consumer though. Calling electric car investment “Green Investment” is like saying ICE powered vehicle investment “fossil fuel investment”.
Posted by BobABooey
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2004
14277 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 10:28 am to
quote:

Nearly half of all global energy transition investments — $546 billion — were in China, while the US came in second at $141 billion. (Had BNEF counted the European Union as a single entity, it would have ranked second, with $180 billion.)

Notice it says the investments were “in” China and the EU, not “by” China and the EU. The paragraph is written in a way to shame the US as somehow being slow to follow their leads when, in fact, the US is likely funding a good portion of the taxpayer-funded investments in China and the EU.
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
65680 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 10:36 am to
One unstable child, having a Princip-like effect on the global economy.

This post was edited on 1/29/23 at 10:37 am
Posted by olgoi khorkhoi
priapism survivor
Member since May 2011
14854 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 10:37 am to
quote:

That we won't do it tells me all I need to know about green energy. Its a grift.




It's also about control. And reducing American influence globally.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260483 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 10:43 am to
Not by market forces.
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
12497 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 10:51 am to
quote:

Imagine if they used it on something that really worked like nuclear.

Nuke about to start popping now that Biden subsidized it.
Posted by bad93ex
Member since Sep 2018
27190 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 10:54 am to
quote:

Molten Salt Reactors baby.


Isn’t Bill Gates building a micro sodium nuclear reactor out west somewhere?
Posted by GurleyGirl
Georgia
Member since Nov 2015
13164 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 11:42 am to
This money should be spent on developing new sustainable technologies instead of wasting it on existing technologies that do more harm to the environment.
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
42566 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 11:58 am to
Are you saying we shouldn't use the free floating nuclear reacting in our sky?
Posted by DeafJam73
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
18439 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

Imagine if they used it on something that really worked like nuclear.


I sort of think that the developed nations should run on nuclear energy as much as possible. Maybe it would be better off to use things like wind turbines and solar panels in developing nations as they don’t have the faculties to maintain large plants.
Posted by Ten Bears
Florida
Member since Oct 2018
3281 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

That we won't do it tells me all I need to know about green energy. Its a grift.


Or the fact that we aren’t seriously investing in carbon capture technology.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram