
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:06 pm to tzimme4
Your wrong, the arm must go forward for it to be a pass. His arm coming up is not apart of the throwing motion FORWARD. His arm never went FORWARD while having possession of the ball. Wrong call.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:06 pm to tzimme4
Zimmy Facebook will pay you for this type of engagement
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:06 pm to tzimme4
The ball went backwards. Even if if arm was going forward. It was a backwards lateral.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:07 pm to tzimme4
"Upon review, he intended to throw a touchdown pass, therefore please add 6 points to the scoreboard for the Lions"
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:07 pm to ReverendJeffro
The no call PI in NFC championship or a pass that went 20 yards backward that was reviewed to be a forward pass. Which is more blatant evidence of the league being rigged?
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:08 pm to tzimme4
Okay, then it's intentional grounding. Because he threw a pass and there was no receiver in the area.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:08 pm to tzimme4
He intended to throw it forward is the reason it’s not a backwards pass?
The nfl really does hate the saints. They are inventing new rules on the fly to screw them. A backwards pass is a backwards pass. Such bullshite.
The nfl really does hate the saints. They are inventing new rules on the fly to screw them. A backwards pass is a backwards pass. Such bullshite.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:08 pm to tzimme4
Of course it was his intent to throw it. But when the defensive play alters his action, that’s the difference maker.
Absolutely bullshite
Absolutely bullshite
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:08 pm to tzimme4
So next time we get a penalty called on us we can say "I didn't intend to go offsides" "I didn't intend to hit the QB in the head"
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:08 pm to tzimme4
I guarantee we will get a letter from the NFL saying it’s the wrong call
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:08 pm to tzimme4
quote:
While many on here disagree, the intent to throe started before the ball left his hand. The backwards throw is irrelevant at that point
Insane take. The ball went backwards, it's a fumble.
Should they overturn interceptions? It wasn't the QB's intent.
Should they overturn fumbles? It wasn't the running back's intent to fumble.
frick it, drops are now completions. The receiver's intention was to catch the ball.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:08 pm to tzimme4
The right call would’ve been for your dad to pull out.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:09 pm to tzimme4
I’m had INTENT to have sex with Megan Fox but couldn’t pull it off. Same with that attempted pass from Goff he fumbled before the arm went forward. Clear fumble
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:09 pm to tzimme4
That's a bunch of bularchy.
it's like they invent a new letter of the law for their stupid f****** rule book every year
it's like they invent a new letter of the law for their stupid f****** rule book every year
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:09 pm to tzimme4
So if your intent is to score a touchdown, you get 6 points?
you and that white horse you rode in on
you and that white horse you rode in on
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:09 pm to spaghettioeauxs
Exactly!
This post was edited on 9/13/26 at 1:11 pm
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:09 pm to tzimme4
So every sack fumble is an incomplete pass by that standard.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:10 pm to GynoSandberg
Did he stop blogging for wwl

Popular
Back to top



0






