Started By
Message

It Was The Right Call

Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:03 pm
Posted by tzimme4
Metairie
Member since Jan 2008
34121 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:03 pm
While many on here disagree, the intent to throe started before the ball left his hand. The backwards throw is irrelevant at that point
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
38443 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:04 pm to
Shut up pussy
Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
80534 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:04 pm to
Suck my dick and balls
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
125610 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

Intent


Lmao
Posted by DeathValley85
Member since May 2011
19436 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:04 pm to
Not shocked given OP
Posted by ElRoos
Member since Nov 2017
7990 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:04 pm to
Says an ex-NFL ref giving his opinion with no evidence…
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
125610 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:04 pm to
This same guy was on here advocating for the bounty gate penalties. In the deep history of this board, he may be its biggest fig
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
74907 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:04 pm to
So if a running back didn’t intend to fumble a ball before being down, it’s not a fumble?
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
178641 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:04 pm to
Every time I’ve ever seen a QB hit while throwing and the ball goes backwards it’s a backwards pass
Posted by HotBoudin
Metry
Member since Sep 2003
1266 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:04 pm to
In my opinion, his intent was to fumble. Opinions are not facts.
Posted by SelaTiger
Member since Aug 2016
22046 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:05 pm to
Well anyone can say they intended to throw a forward pass any time they attempt a backward throw then. They make it up as they go.
Posted by Yeti_Chaser
Member since Nov 2017
13557 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:05 pm to
Well technically the intent to throw started when they called a passing play
Posted by Gonadballbarian
Member since Dec 2017
1853 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:05 pm to
What is an intent to throw?? if you raise your arm up, you intend to throw the ball?
So if you don't throw the ball and you tuck it back in is that an incomplete pass?
Posted by JackandWater
Member since Apr 2020
405 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:05 pm to
So if the qb throws a backwards pass in the flat but his intent was to throw it forward, it’s not a fumble?
This post was edited on 9/13/26 at 1:06 pm
Posted by ShoeBang
Member since May 2012
22379 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:05 pm to
When the ball is thrown backwards it is a backwards lateral. There’s no intent
Posted by yaherrdme
The Place to Be
Member since Feb 2004
6029 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:05 pm to
Intent...why should that factor in...can we call back interceptions now if the QB intended to throw it shorter or further ?
Posted by Seeker
Member since Jul 2011
2283 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:05 pm to
The intent is to throw a completion, so there are no longer interceptions.
This post was edited on 9/13/26 at 1:11 pm
Posted by BigPerm30
Member since Aug 2011
32476 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:05 pm to
I didn’t realize intent mattered in the NFL. My intent was not to throw an INT? Do they take the INT away? fricking dumb
Posted by tigerbait3488
River Ridge
Member since Dec 2007
11595 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:05 pm to
Horrible call
Posted by Hank Marducas
Sittin' on the dock of the bay
Member since Sep 2009
5706 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:05 pm to
Biggest loser on this site
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram