Tatum vs ingram

quote:

---

Didn't know that ingram is actually younger than tatum

---

...he’s not

Tatum is a winner. Ingram will be a guy who puts up decent stats on bad teams.

And if all were equal (which in my opinion it isn't close); I go to eye test.

Tatum is a fluid player. He can shoot and he does play D. Ingram is a droopy eyed, pound the rock, no-shot, less D, very skinny wing, who will sucker punch.

Tatum all the way. I think Brown is a better wing prospect than Ingram.

quote:

---

Tatum is better. But people saying the Lakers package is bad are just idiots that are butthurt by the whole thing. Ingram is a good young player who improved a lot this year.

---

Is Ingram a potential star? Is he worth the contract he will be due next year? How are the other players and the draft picks that were rumored to be included?

Tatum has less tatts.

quote:

---

But people saying the Lakers package is bad are just idiots that are butthurt by the whole thing. Ingram is a good young player who improved a lot this year.

---

I mean it's something, but your trading for a losing team and not that great draft picks. It looks better on paper or in theory but it's pretty clear what you're getting, a young losing team.

If you put them with Jrue and Randle (I personally hope we keep both of them no matter what), then yea you might have a good team, but that's kind of hard to say.

Kuzma is a weak defender. Ingram is a weak defender.

The best player offered in the Lakers deal was Ball, and he doesn't want to play here. The draft picks were a weak offer.

Lakers are nothing more than "an" option among many offers the Pelicans will scrutinize this summer.

The players from the Celtics, individually, are better and collectively much better.

Smart is a defensive dawg. He can't shoot, but will, leadership and heart are worth more than Ingram now.

Brown is a good defender and is a high ceiling player.

Tatum, as everyone knows is probable all-star ad infinitum.

Yes Ingram will be a star. When will you knuckleheads realize this. Meanwhile Tatum is regressing.

@scaryclown you sound like the kind of guy who would love to give Julius Randle $20M a year bc he scores 20 points a game.
(Meanwhile you don’t notice that his plus/minus is -10)

Tatum has a much higher upside. Ingram is a fine player and is probably held back some this year bc he is better in a point forward/ lebron-like role.

Ingram is also in his 3rd year instead of 2nd so you’d be stuck having only 1 year to evaluate whether he’s a star and worthy of a big contract. He seems like a guy that will always have questions marks and that will situation is scarily similarly to the Eric Gordon post-CP3 trade situation.

Now like someone else said, if it comes down to everything falling against us and the lakers are our best offer. It could be worse than their package.

Tatum is the better asset at the moment. Will probably end up being the better player. That being said I still think Ingram has alot of talent and if he gets in the right system will be a very good player.