- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Zack Snyder’s 'Rebel Moon' Now playing on Netflix
Posted on 12/26/23 at 3:42 pm to hiltacular
Posted on 12/26/23 at 3:42 pm to hiltacular
quote:
Zack Snyder’s Rebel Moon – Part One: A Child of Fire has kicked off with viewing numbers that suggest a solid start to an original franchise.
Netflix announced Tuesday that the science fiction fantasy was the most viewed title on the streaming giant following its debut the night of Dec. 21, generating 23.9 million views in three (plus a few hours) days.
The numbers are a solid kickoff for the movie, which doesn’t have big A-listers and is flying on the strength of the filmmaking brand of Snyder, who is best known for directing DC superhero movies such as Man of Steel, Batman v Superman, and his Justice League film
LINK
2
Posted on 12/26/23 at 4:07 pm to RLDSC FAN
Posted on 12/26/23 at 6:38 pm to RLDSC FAN
Jax Teller with a grill as a turncoat? What's not to love. Like others have said, tired of the skinny female smashing big muscle bound "trained' killers. 
Posted on 12/26/23 at 8:12 pm to JinFL
Battle Beyond the Stars and Krull both did it better. This movie sucked.
Posted on 12/27/23 at 12:44 am to RLDSC FAN
One of the worst movies I’ve ever seen. My goodness that was bad.
Posted on 12/27/23 at 2:00 am to RLDSC FAN
(no message)
This post was edited on 12/27/23 at 2:02 am
Posted on 12/27/23 at 2:08 am to RLDSC FAN
It reminds me of a bad adaptation of a really good book.
Basically it’s like they tried to hit all of the high points of a novel, but ended up leaving out everything that made the book good.
Except that there is no book…
Basically it’s like they tried to hit all of the high points of a novel, but ended up leaving out everything that made the book good.
Except that there is no book…
Posted on 12/27/23 at 2:10 pm to BigBinBR
quote:
It reminds me of a bad adaptation of a really good book. Basically it’s like they tried to hit all of the high points of a novel, but ended up leaving out everything that made the book good. Except that there is no book…
I’ve said in this thread that it seemed like a book adaptation where they didn’t have time to flesh out the background of these things and if we had read the book it would have been fine.
This post was edited on 12/27/23 at 2:11 pm
Posted on 12/27/23 at 2:49 pm to cfish140
quote:
No it’s not the best film of the year but I don’t see how it’s any different than Guardians of the galaxy or any other marvel spectacle this board nuts over
Good Lord. I don’t care if you liked it but any GotG is a million times better as a movie.
They have an actual plot, characters have depth and purpose, etc. I mean it’s not even comparable from strictly a movie making perspective.
This post was edited on 12/27/23 at 2:52 pm
Posted on 12/27/23 at 2:59 pm to Esquire
When a film critic (I use the term lightly since there was no link so I don't know who they are) says this is the worst movie they have ever seen they lose all credibility with me. It definitely isn't a great movie or even a good movie but if a critic hasn't seen a worse movie they haven't seen enough movies to be taken seriously.
Posted on 12/27/23 at 3:58 pm to iwyLSUiwy
quote:
Watchmen
overall a pretty faithful adaption.
He missed the entire point of the book and his obsession w/making everything look "cool" robbed it of the source materials soul.
This post was edited on 12/27/23 at 3:59 pm
Posted on 12/27/23 at 10:13 pm to mt1
quote:
Battle Beyond the Stars and Krull both did it better.
A Bug’s Life did it better.
Posted on 12/29/23 at 1:02 pm to RLDSC FAN
I did not hate this
But it’s two movies in one. The hero’s back story is a movie by itself. That hurt it imo. But what else can we expect from the master storytelling style of Zack Snyder?
It’s an above average fun time with (imo) incredible visuals. The villain was great imo. Questionable storytelling obviously but I was so stoned I didn’t care.
But it’s two movies in one. The hero’s back story is a movie by itself. That hurt it imo. But what else can we expect from the master storytelling style of Zack Snyder?
It’s an above average fun time with (imo) incredible visuals. The villain was great imo. Questionable storytelling obviously but I was so stoned I didn’t care.
This post was edited on 12/29/23 at 1:12 pm
Posted on 12/29/23 at 1:27 pm to RLDSC FAN
Oh wow lol. I’m surprised.
Honestly, for regular Netflix viewers, this is probably very above average for the content they’re used to lol.
Honestly, for regular Netflix viewers, this is probably very above average for the content they’re used to lol.
This post was edited on 12/29/23 at 1:37 pm
Posted on 12/29/23 at 2:12 pm to abellsujr
quote:
But it’s half a movie in none
FIFY
This is all a build up to a sequel that can very well be worse.
Posted on 12/29/23 at 2:17 pm to Socrates Johnson
Right. I’m saying this movie itself had too much stuff for 2 hours. The origin story is enough content for a full movie.
So maybe this is a trilogy of content stuffed into two movies.
Regardless, the narrative is pretty terrible I completely agree.
Honestly I did not hate the characters. Some good individual pieces. It feels like a graphic novel with cool visuals and bad storytelling. Snyder is the Todd McFarland of movies.
So maybe this is a trilogy of content stuffed into two movies.
Regardless, the narrative is pretty terrible I completely agree.
Honestly I did not hate the characters. Some good individual pieces. It feels like a graphic novel with cool visuals and bad storytelling. Snyder is the Todd McFarland of movies.
This post was edited on 12/29/23 at 2:30 pm
Posted on 12/29/23 at 2:34 pm to abellsujr
quote:
Right. I’m saying this movie itself had too much stuff for 2 hours. The origin story is enough content for a full movie.
So maybe this is a trilogy of content stuffed into two movies.
There's a Directors cut that's 4 hours long and rated R coming up. They should've just released that instead of this chopped up version. Netflix is just being greedy.
Posted on 12/29/23 at 2:39 pm to RLDSC FAN
4 hours? Half the movie was cut? Jesus that explains so much
Posted on 12/29/23 at 2:56 pm to Dr RC
quote:
He missed the entire point of the book and his obsession w/making everything look "cool" robbed it of the source materials soul.
I completely disagree, and the Watcmen is one of my favorite novels of all time. I used to read it every year. So I hold the source material in high regard. For the most part, he nailed every character. I don't think you could have possibly done Rorsach any better, he was perfect. Even Dr. Manhattan was great. Many of the iconic scenes were almost shot for shot/word for word as they were in the novel. The sould of it was still there for me, it just didn't have the same shock value ending.
Posted on 12/29/23 at 3:04 pm to cfish140
quote:
No it’s not the best film of the year but I don’t see how it’s any different than Guardians of the galaxy or any other marvel spectacle this board nuts over
if you think this turd pie is comparable to Guardians, then my friend there is no way you watched the movie - cause Ray Charles can see better than you.
Page 7 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News