
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: You can see everything
Posted on 11/2/26 at 9:15 am to Bert Macklin FBI
Posted on 11/2/26 at 9:15 am to Bert Macklin FBI
I saw this last night and I'm not sure what to think about it.
Just a lot to unpack.
Just a lot to unpack.
Posted on 11/2/26 at 9:41 am to tigerbait2010
quote:
She’s in the 99% of ability to manipulate even evidenced by some in the thread finding her naive, but even doing a basic dive into the defrauding scandal serves as plenty of proof she knowingly misled millions.
Her father was literally part of Enron.
She dropped out of Stanford to explicitly to start a company in order to become a billionaire. Her entire raison d'etre was to claw her way to a billion dollars by any means necessary.
I'm not saying she started out intending to defraud people. I'm saying she took the exit to defrauding people without much hesitation or navel gazing. She was really good at it. She remains really good at it.
Posted on 11/2/26 at 9:58 am to Ace Midnight
was her whole deal an act in the movie?
the wide eyed idiot persona?
because no way that person deceives tons of companies and people but is that also the point of the documentary? that the wide eyed idiot was a complete character played out for Nathan?
the wide eyed idiot persona?
because no way that person deceives tons of companies and people but is that also the point of the documentary? that the wide eyed idiot was a complete character played out for Nathan?
Posted on 11/2/26 at 10:01 am to CBandits82
quote:
was her whole deal an act in the movie?
the wide eyed idiot persona?
I think so.
They're trying to do a repackaged version of that same scam .
#Youdothemath
Posted on 11/2/26 at 10:24 am to Ace Midnight
I can’t stop laughing this morning over how insane her relationship with Billy is. The exploitation and manipulation between the two is so mutual, never seen anything like it in my entire life. Sleeping on it it’s easily a top 3 in the most insane documentaries I have ever seen in my life.
Posted on 11/2/26 at 10:59 am to tigerbait2010
I agree that it’s a must see
It’s one of the most fascinating movies I’ve seen in a long time. The way Nathan filmed it is very unusual. I like it. I also liked the friction between he and the Billy.
Didn’t care much for that actress who seemed like an airhead.
It’s one of the most fascinating movies I’ve seen in a long time. The way Nathan filmed it is very unusual. I like it. I also liked the friction between he and the Billy.
Didn’t care much for that actress who seemed like an airhead.
Posted on 11/2/26 at 12:07 pm to crazyLSUstudent
Saw it yesterday. I can’t stop thinking about it. What an absolute mind frick. Might be the best documentary I’ve ever seen.
Posted on 11/2/26 at 1:42 pm to Sam Quint
quote:
The fact that he has power of attorney while she is in prison is the part that leaves some doubt.
I thought about this too, but it makes sense when you think about the fact that she gets docked 70% of any income she has coming in because she’s ordered to repay the hundred million dollars plus that she owes. As I understand it from the settlement, she has to pay that back and his docked until she does. Might be the reason why they are not married legally.
I’m just speculating of course. I don’t know.
Which is kind of germane to the film. Nobody knows. It’s a commentary on documentaries in general. You can’t trust them to be “the truth” anymore than reality TV is “reality”. I thought Fielder did a brilliant job of illustrating this point.
Posted on 11/3/26 at 10:00 pm to crazyLSUstudent
Saw this tonight. Looking forward to reading through the thread tomorrow. So much to unpack. Initial reaction is it’s one of the best things I’ve seen in a while.
Posted on 11/3/26 at 10:26 pm to SlidellCajun
quote:oh wow, I thought bringing her in was easily the best part of the movie.
Didn’t care much for that actress who seemed like an airhead.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 1:14 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
They're trying to do a repackaged version of that same scam .
One of my favorite parts was them talking to an expert and he says, yeah technology is advancing, they had a good idea, but what they were doing was all wrong. And Billy’s over there about to freak out.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 6:34 am to wareaglepete
quote:I really wanted to hear more of what that guy had to say.
One of my favorite parts was them talking to an expert and he says, yeah technology is advancing, they had a good idea, but what they were doing was all wrong. And Billy’s over there about to freak out.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 8:45 am to coolpapaboze
Saw it last night and haven't really got to stew on it much and haven't read the thread but my initial reaction is that was pretty brilliant. I went in expecting it to be brilliant because I'm a Fielder fan, so it didn't disappoint.
I guess I'll talk about some of the people...
Elizabeth - Found her to be very likeable. There was honestly nothing in this that made me want to root against her. Whether it was genuine is a completely different story. As Nathan said, she is either being honest or she is the most manipulative person that has ever lived. I think it's a little bit, or maybe a lot of both. She was 100% being deceptive with Theranos' abilities, that really can't be argued. She's not dumb enough to not know that the way she described the machine is not an accurate description of it's capabilities. She scammed a lot f people and deserved jail time.
Billy - He's obviously a douche.I didn't find myself hating him as much as the movie wanted you to and by the end I was just like yeah he's controlling but as Nathan said, the two genuinely love each other. He's very protective of his wife and there's something to be said for that. Him having power of attorney was not a big deal at all even the Amanda Seyried wanted to act like it was. She's just a clueless actor. She's in prison and he's financially savvy and needs to be controlling the money. As broke as they pretend to be, they are not, they most likely have a ton of money and assets and he needs to be in control of that when she's in jail and can't handle day to day.
Amanda - Really enjoyed her being in the movie, that made for a great twist. Although I didn't like her opinion on most things honestly. She is defensive of her show and that is understandable. But in playing that role she was taught a lot of falsehood and it was clear it ingrained a bias. Again, which is understandable. Her hate of Billy was pretty obvious and honestly one of the ebst parts of the movie was when Billy roasted her about Charlie Kirk. I've never watched a Charlie Kirk video in my life until he was killed but it was hilarious he had the balls to say she's doing awful on social media because of her comments about him and she said "I hated that he was performative" and his response was "You're an actress"
She was defensive of her show and he was defensive of his wife. Her bias really started to show after that though. She did a very good job playing Elizabeth though.
I loved that halfway through it became classic Nathan like a long episode of The Rehearsal. It starts one way and halfway in you're blown away by the direction it's going.
I never watched The Dropout, just the HBO documentary. Nothing about my opinion really changed about Elizabeth other than she is controllable. So maybe her Ex had a bigger role in the scam and should take more of the blame. She is more likeable than I expected and didn't come off as crazy as the previews made it seem. The close up shots were so well done and I think just the right amount of them. An entire movie of those close ups would have gotten old so he balanced that nicely.
4.75/5
I guess I'll talk about some of the people...
Elizabeth - Found her to be very likeable. There was honestly nothing in this that made me want to root against her. Whether it was genuine is a completely different story. As Nathan said, she is either being honest or she is the most manipulative person that has ever lived. I think it's a little bit, or maybe a lot of both. She was 100% being deceptive with Theranos' abilities, that really can't be argued. She's not dumb enough to not know that the way she described the machine is not an accurate description of it's capabilities. She scammed a lot f people and deserved jail time.
Billy - He's obviously a douche.I didn't find myself hating him as much as the movie wanted you to and by the end I was just like yeah he's controlling but as Nathan said, the two genuinely love each other. He's very protective of his wife and there's something to be said for that. Him having power of attorney was not a big deal at all even the Amanda Seyried wanted to act like it was. She's just a clueless actor. She's in prison and he's financially savvy and needs to be controlling the money. As broke as they pretend to be, they are not, they most likely have a ton of money and assets and he needs to be in control of that when she's in jail and can't handle day to day.
Amanda - Really enjoyed her being in the movie, that made for a great twist. Although I didn't like her opinion on most things honestly. She is defensive of her show and that is understandable. But in playing that role she was taught a lot of falsehood and it was clear it ingrained a bias. Again, which is understandable. Her hate of Billy was pretty obvious and honestly one of the ebst parts of the movie was when Billy roasted her about Charlie Kirk. I've never watched a Charlie Kirk video in my life until he was killed but it was hilarious he had the balls to say she's doing awful on social media because of her comments about him and she said "I hated that he was performative" and his response was "You're an actress"
I loved that halfway through it became classic Nathan like a long episode of The Rehearsal. It starts one way and halfway in you're blown away by the direction it's going.
I never watched The Dropout, just the HBO documentary. Nothing about my opinion really changed about Elizabeth other than she is controllable. So maybe her Ex had a bigger role in the scam and should take more of the blame. She is more likeable than I expected and didn't come off as crazy as the previews made it seem. The close up shots were so well done and I think just the right amount of them. An entire movie of those close ups would have gotten old so he balanced that nicely.
4.75/5
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:20 am to iwyLSUiwy
quote:
Nothing about my opinion really changed about Elizabeth other than she is controllable
IDK that this is true. She wanted it to appear that she is controllable but she is also a master manipulator. Everyone who worked with her at Theranos talks about how she could completely control a room even if it was filled with billionaires. It makes her look more innocent if she plays up the Autistic genius who is controlled by the men she keeps in her company.
The fact that you came away thinking she is likeable and controllable AFTER seeing the documentary shows just how manipulative she is.
Also it wasn't semantics that got her in trouble. Walgreens doesn't sign on if she doesn't lead them to actually believe the machine could do what she said it could do.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:29 am to Bert Macklin FBI
quote:
IDK that this is true
Me not really changing my opinion of her is not really something that is up for debate of true or false. It's just simply my feelings towards her.
quote:
The fact that you came away thinking she is likeable and controllable AFTER seeing the documentary shows just how manipulative she is.
Not really. Fielder literally said she is either genuine or she is the most manipulative person ever. he wasn't even sure and he lived with her. I am saying she is both. I think she is genuine in some things and also a master manipulator.
quote:
Also it wasn't semantics that got her in trouble. Walgreens doesn't sign on if she doesn't lead them to actually believe the machine could do what she said it could do.
I said I think she needs to be in jail. She scammed people. That obviously isn't just her wording things differently. I know she knew it couldn't do the things she led people to believe.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 11:53 am to iwyLSUiwy
this movie is basically the Rehearsal season 3 
Posted on 11/4/26 at 12:22 pm to CBandits82
Yea kind of what I was thinking towards the end of the movie. That's definitely not a bad thing.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 12:49 pm to iwyLSUiwy
quote:
Me not really changing my opinion of her is not really something that is up for debate of true or false. It's just simply my feelings towards her.
I don’t really care about your opinion, it was the “she is controllable” part I was speaking of. I think she wanted to appear controllable but she is the one that controls people. Hell she got the first schmuck to give her $20M.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 1:19 pm to iwyLSUiwy
quote:
Fielder literally said she is either genuine or she is the most manipulative person ever. he wasn't even sure and he lived with her. I am saying she is both.
i'm having a hard time coming up with a scenario in which the most manipulative person ever could l also be genuine.
"i'm the most faithful husband ever except for that i have cheated on my wife a few times"
Posted on 11/4/26 at 1:27 pm to iwyLSUiwy
What do you find genuine about her?
I'm not sure there is a both. As you have quoted Nathan saying it's either/or.
I'm not sure there is a both. As you have quoted Nathan saying it's either/or.

Popular
Back to top



0











