
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: You can see everything
Posted on 10/17/26 at 1:11 pm to Poker_hog
Posted on 10/17/26 at 1:11 pm to Poker_hog
quote:
Also maybe a third of the theater applauded the supporting actress when she talked shite about Charlie Kirk. Just surprised me being in a movie theater in Arkansas.
She just really seemed like a little bitch. And I knew nothing about her Kirk comments and was thinking it before she got into it with Billy. That dude has issues, but kudos to him for not taking any shite off her and going right back at her. Nathan’s expressions during all that were great.
This post was edited on 10/17/26 at 1:13 pm
Posted on 10/17/26 at 1:55 pm to wareaglepete
I didn’t like the Kirk comments but I came across liking her. She was basically unguarded the whole time and was great going in and out of playing Holmes. Also, pretty sure she was very drunk in at least two of the scenes.
Posted on 10/17/26 at 2:22 pm to NIH
quote:
Also, pretty sure she was very drunk in at least two of the scenes.
Yeah, that probably helped shape my opinion.
a-hole when drunk recognizes a-hole when drunk
Posted on 10/17/26 at 3:11 pm to wareaglepete
is this thread spoiler free?
i want to read reviews but worried about spoilers
i want to read reviews but worried about spoilers
Posted on 10/17/26 at 3:55 pm to CBandits82
I’ve been trying to be spoiler free. Don’t know how good I’ve done.
Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:18 pm to wildtigercat93
Best part of the movie for me was Amanda being on board for Holmes being potentially innocent when it was time to shite talk the husband, but the second her portrayal was criticized by Nathan she was immediately back to “She’s a liar and we portrayed things accurately!”
Perfectly encapsulates modern women.
Perfectly encapsulates modern women.
This post was edited on 10/17/26 at 10:21 pm
Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:30 pm to _Hurricane_
quote:
Best part of the movie for me was Amanda being on board for Holmes being potentially innocent when it was time to shite talk the husband, but the second her portrayal was criticized by Nathan she was immediately back to “She’s a liar and we portrayed things accurately!”
I don’t think that’s really how that went down.
She’s pretty convinced that Holmes is guilty and a manipulator, and works as an audience stand in for people who already had their mind made up about Holmes.
At the same time despite that, she also sees how she seems to have a cycliar habit of being ensnared by even more manipulative men in her life and the husband is clearly a pretty shady character that is running his own scam, that may or may not be the same one that Holmes is running.
Her frankly human response to Holmes criticizing her role in that movie, is one of the more interesting subplots of the whole thing. She’s very defensive at first but you can tell it is something she is trying to grapple with in terms of how much effect she truly has had on Holmes life and how culpable she is as an actress who took a role. It’s asking a lot of meta questions about documentaries, their goals compared to Holmes goals, about acting and how truth is told and understood by the public.
Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:41 pm to wildtigercat93
Spoiler alert:
The dinner scene with Amanda, Billy, and Nathan was one of the most uncomfortable things I've ever watched.
The dinner scene with Amanda, Billy, and Nathan was one of the most uncomfortable things I've ever watched.
This post was edited on 10/17/26 at 10:42 pm
Posted on 10/17/26 at 11:03 pm to MightyJoeYoung
quote:
run for best documentary as well as supporting actress
You will understand if you watch this
Spoilers
The nude scene with the guy’s dong in the shower was an odd choice to include. It added nothing to the movie, other than a cheap laugh ( I laughed).
I’m just floored that Nathan is selling out theaters. I love his unique brand of comedy and am thrilled that this is doing so well. The theater experience was very fun for this, and it has been a hell of a long time since I’ve seen a comedy in the theaters where everyone is cracking up.
I highly recommend seeing this in theaters, especially if you are a fan of Nathan’s.
This post was edited on 10/18/26 at 10:49 am
Posted on 10/18/26 at 9:56 am to SUB
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
Sensational WOM is making new doc smash #YouCanSeeEverything explode at the #boxoffice!
After stellar SAT, opening wknd is now at $15M from only 855 thtrs for scorching $17,544 avg + bright road ahead!
2nd biggest opening of ALL-TIME for a non-music documentary behind only Fahrenheit 9/11's $23.9M.
70% of crowd was under 35. Aud reax are thru the roof with 98% on RT and super high 4.8 on Letterboxd.
YCSM will rank as #2 movie nationwide this wknd! INCREDIBLE!!
Posted on 10/18/26 at 1:08 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
70% of crowd was under 35.
The showing I went to everyone was young. I might have saw 1 person over the age of 50
Posted on 10/18/26 at 5:29 pm to crazyLSUstudent
I had forgotten and didn’t even put it together until today, but my wife and I and my daughter were in the car headed to the theatre, we had our own Who’s On First moment.
My wife didn’t even know what we were going to see, she just wanted to go.
She asked what movie are we going to see?
I said, You Can See Everything. She said, which one are we going to see?
I said, You Can See Everything.
She said, I know but I don’t even know which one you said we were going to see.
My daughter laughing says, that’s the name of the movie!

My wife didn’t even know what we were going to see, she just wanted to go.
She asked what movie are we going to see?
I said, You Can See Everything. She said, which one are we going to see?
I said, You Can See Everything.
She said, I know but I don’t even know which one you said we were going to see.
My daughter laughing says, that’s the name of the movie!
This post was edited on 10/18/26 at 5:31 pm
Posted on 10/18/26 at 7:40 pm to wareaglepete
I wonder if fielder choose that title as a tip to the skit name
Posted on 10/18/26 at 8:19 pm to crazyLSUstudent
The name of the movie is the text that she sent him on the beach “btw you can totally see everything” - which is right after them talking about him moving into the beach house full time
Posted on 10/18/26 at 8:44 pm to wildtigercat93
Wished they would’ve spent more time interviewing her dad. He seemed to have some insight and answers.
Posted on 10/18/26 at 9:23 pm to Gpfather
The Enron name drop was when I realized there was a generational divide in my audience bc there was a mix of laughter and audible confusion 
Posted on 10/18/26 at 9:50 pm to wildtigercat93
I still have no idea who this person this "doc" is about and I don't know how so many ppl know who she is.
Obviously she's famous somehow, but how?
Obviously she's famous somehow, but how?
Posted on 10/18/26 at 10:39 pm to MightyJoeYoung
quote:
I still have no idea who this person this "doc" is about and I don't know how so many ppl know who she is. Obviously she's famous somehow, but how?

Posted on 10/18/26 at 11:01 pm to MightyJoeYoung
quote:
still have no idea who this person this "doc" is about and I don't know how so many ppl know who she is. Obviously she's famous somehow, but how?
Well you see, there was a time in which at least some facets of our traditional media apparatus and political/legal structure weren’t completely beholden to the whims of the CEOs of tech companies stacking a house of cards of a financial system, and back then sometimes when those CEOs did crimes, we had journalists and the judicial system sort them out for said crimes.
The evolution of Billy in this movie actually highlights this change in era quite well, in the first part of the film he’s presenting himself as this altruistic visionary who wants to change the world and is very manicured about his story and how it is told, but when we shift back to Texas 2 years later- he doesn’t really care about any of that outside of making his company into something that will change HIS world, and the personal flaws in his personality and ambition are used as weapons and armor in a much more polarized political era. It’s like watching someone evolve in real time from a bad Steve Jobs impersonator into a Sam Altman/Elon imitator
But yeah it was a pretty big deal at the time, pretty easy thing to look up and find out as much as you’re interested in finding out about that story

Popular
Back to top



2








