- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Twisters trailer
Posted on 2/11/24 at 10:27 pm to The Egg
Posted on 2/11/24 at 10:27 pm to The Egg
I mean...c'mon? Why not just watch the original?
Quit wasting my time sonny.
Its not like original is dated or sucks.
This feels like that Red Dawn remake, which was the most unnecessary thing ever put on film since Caddyshack 2.
Quit wasting my time sonny.
Its not like original is dated or sucks.
This feels like that Red Dawn remake, which was the most unnecessary thing ever put on film since Caddyshack 2.
4
Posted on 2/11/24 at 10:56 pm to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
quote:
I mean...c'mon? Why not just watch the original?
The original was one of the most epic movie theater experiences of my childhood. Was the summer before my freshman year in high school when it released.
Glen Powell is a good looking dude. #nohomo #notthattheresanythingwrongwiththat
Posted on 2/11/24 at 11:35 pm to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
I see no reason for this movie. I agree with the idea of just watching the original.
Posted on 2/12/24 at 6:35 am to elprez00
quote:
Glen Powell is a good looking dude
Truth
Posted on 2/12/24 at 8:33 am to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Somehow the special effects look worse than the 1996 original. The lead in the new one can't carry Paxton's jock strap. And Jami Gertz.
Posted on 2/12/24 at 8:40 am to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
quote:
I mean...c'mon? Why not just watch the original?
From the trailer it sounds like 2 different ideas from the storm chasers. 1 was trying to study it, 2 could very well lean in to what was learned from 1 and now taking it a step further to "destroy" a tornado. Sure you could argue they are trying to cash grab off of the name, but if they build off what they learned from 1 to try and do something never before done in this one then this actually seems like a legit sequel
quote:
Its not like original is dated or sucks.
This feels like that Red Dawn remake, which was the most unnecessary thing ever put on film since Caddyshack 2.
Red Dawn was remake, this looks to be a sequel., completely different.
I have never seen Caddyshack II so I can't say
Posted on 2/12/24 at 10:58 am to The Egg
The original was better than it even needed to me. I heard someone say one time that if you just listened to the audio of the original it would still be a good time. Then you throw in the visual and it is simply a fantastic piece of work. What the hell, I'll give this one a try!
Posted on 2/12/24 at 11:14 am to Doug_H
quote:
I have never seen Caddyshack II so I can't say
Then how do you stay in the conversation on this board? You have no Compass.
Posted on 2/12/24 at 11:21 am to Grievous Angel
quote:
Missed it.
The OG was stupid.
Most rewatchable best-worst movie ever.
Posted on 2/12/24 at 11:36 am to Trauma14
The original is my favorite movie of all time. I wore out our vhs copy growing up and still have it.
As a massive fan of the original I’m not all that hyped about this one. I like glen powell too but I feel it will fall well short
As a massive fan of the original I’m not all that hyped about this one. I like glen powell too but I feel it will fall well short
Posted on 2/12/24 at 11:45 am to The Egg
Aside from the end goal (destroying a tornado instead of trying to research it from the interior), it seems pretty much like a copy of the original movie.
The idea of rival storm chasers is very, very silly.
The idea of rival storm chasers is very, very silly.
Posted on 2/12/24 at 11:47 am to Grievous Angel
quote:
The OG was stupid.
You misspelled awesome.
And PLEASE tell me we get at least this:
This post was edited on 2/12/24 at 11:49 am
Posted on 2/12/24 at 7:52 pm to athenslife101
quote:
Why would you see a movie like this streaming?
Agreed. This is the kinda movie the big screen and sound enhance.
Posted on 2/13/24 at 12:50 pm to rebelrouser
quote:
Somehow the special effects look worse than the 1996 original.
Was just about to post this. How do the effects look worse 30 years later?
Posted on 2/13/24 at 12:55 pm to MemphisGuy
I saw a few shot for shot remakes so I wouldn’t doubt it
Just watch the original
Just watch the original
Posted on 2/13/24 at 2:08 pm to PurpleandGold Motown
quote:
Looked fun. I doubt I'll see it in theaters. Probably a wait until it's streaming for me.
If you're going to watch it, you might as well see it in theatres. It's for sure going to be better in theatres than it is at home.
Twister was one of my earliest theatre memories and even though it's not a favorite movie of mine, it was a fun theatre ride. I'll probably see this in theatres for that reason alone.
Posted on 2/13/24 at 3:33 pm to Doug_H
quote:
Red Dawn was remake, this looks to be a sequel., completely different.
This is a very loose sequel that takes place in the same universe but with characters who are mostly unrelated to the original film. There will be callbacks, cameos, and minor characters from the original playing support roles, but that's about it.
This could have easily been its own film with no connection to a franchise. You can't make money like that, however. So they have to attach a familiar name to the project.
This post was edited on 2/13/24 at 3:35 pm
Posted on 2/13/24 at 3:44 pm to athenslife101
quote:
Why would you see a movie like this streaming?
Because theaters suck and cost too much.
Posted on 2/13/24 at 3:58 pm to The Egg
10000% chance this will be a “climate change will kill us all” theme.
So predictable. This is why modern movies suck. Sure there are a some exceptions, but most are just predictable cultish movies for sheep.
And a big reason why there have been so many bombs lately.
A complete lack of originality from the very people who we are told are innovators and artists
So predictable. This is why modern movies suck. Sure there are a some exceptions, but most are just predictable cultish movies for sheep.
And a big reason why there have been so many bombs lately.
A complete lack of originality from the very people who we are told are innovators and artists
This post was edited on 2/13/24 at 4:05 pm
Posted on 2/13/24 at 4:16 pm to Hayekian serf
Autocorrect put a ys instead of ers and it took me somewhere way more fun
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News