Started By
Message

re: Dances With Wolves gets too much undeserved shite

Posted on 3/3/21 at 12:07 pm to
Posted by Adajax
Member since Nov 2015
8303 posts
Posted on 3/3/21 at 12:07 pm to
DWW is a cheap knockoff of Little Big Man and not nearly as good. Downvote away beeotches!
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
39242 posts
Posted on 3/3/21 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

many people say is one of the ten greatest films ever made


Many people are wrong.
Posted by JakeFromStateFarm
*wears khakis
Member since Jun 2012
12969 posts
Posted on 3/3/21 at 5:46 pm to
Can we just all agree that Avatar was basically just a high budget, CGI remake of DWW?
Posted by YNWA
Member since Nov 2015
7160 posts
Posted on 3/3/21 at 6:15 pm to
Costner was great in it. Didn't care for Mary McDonnell. She just wasn't convincing to me in that part. Plenty of actress's/actors have portrayed a white man/woman captured by Indians and raised by Native Americans much better than she did.
Posted by Jack Ruby
Member since Apr 2014
26537 posts
Posted on 3/3/21 at 7:59 pm to
They apparently had Julia Robertsiof they wanted her for the Mary McDonnell part, but Costner said they had no on screen chemistry so they went with Mary.


I'm not a fan of McDonnell in the part either, but I simply can't see Julia Roberts in that part at all. It would seem too cartoonish with her in it.

If she got it, though, who knows if she would have gotten Pretty Woman (same year release) and her career could have been much much different.
This post was edited on 3/3/21 at 8:01 pm
Posted by PowerTool
The dark side of the road
Member since Dec 2009
22919 posts
Posted on 3/3/21 at 8:18 pm to
quote:

Plenty of actress's/actors have portrayed a white man/woman captured by Indians and raised by Native Americans much better than she did.


How would you rank your top 10?
Posted by mattz1122
Member since Oct 2007
55713 posts
Posted on 3/3/21 at 10:22 pm to
Soldier fart
This post was edited on 3/3/21 at 10:46 pm
Posted by bcoop199
Kansas City, MISSOURI
Member since Nov 2013
8936 posts
Posted on 3/3/21 at 11:08 pm to
Posted by YNWA
Member since Nov 2015
7160 posts
Posted on 3/4/21 at 7:03 am to
Yeah. Can't see Julia Roberts in that role. I was thinking maybe a more homely, old west looking actress like Sissy Spacek or something.
Posted by Kracka
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Aug 2004
42128 posts
Posted on 3/4/21 at 8:33 am to
I don't think I have ever had the opportunity to watch the directors cut, but what was different about from the theatrical release?
Posted by PJinAtl
Atlanta
Member since Nov 2007
14058 posts
Posted on 3/4/21 at 11:09 am to
quote:

I don't think I have ever had the opportunity to watch the directors cut, but what was different about from the theatrical release
There are a good many either additional scenes or extended sequences that were trimmed to get the run time down for the theatrical release.

I think it is something like nearly 40 new scenes and 15 extended scenes, as well as reordering some of the scenes.

Among the additional things that I can remember... you see the previous Army battalion at Fort Sedgewick when they leave it; the Lakota find the white men who massacre the buffalo and kill them; you see more of the major at Fort Hayes who has lost his mind; you find out why Stands With A Fist is in mourning; longer scene of Stands With A Fist being kidnapped
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
94831 posts
Posted on 3/4/21 at 11:15 am to
quote:

But judged solely as a cimeatic feat, it's magnificent.


Meh - it's a mediocre epic with some good moments.

It's one part Little Big Man, two parts Fergully. It's attractively shot. Costner was trying too hard to be Clint Eastwood at that point in his career (and it showed). Much like Titanic, it suffered from poor acting out of the romantic leads. The supporting cast, particularly the actors portraying natives, was excellent and really saved the movie (as the supporting cast attempted to do in Titanic and Armageddon).

The score was great. The pacing was off, overall direction was just off.
This post was edited on 3/4/21 at 11:22 am
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
86531 posts
Posted on 3/4/21 at 11:30 am to
quote:

Didn't care for Mary McDonnell. She just wasn't convincing to me in that part.
She was fantastic.
quote:

Plenty of actress's/actors have portrayed a white man/woman captured by Indians and raised by Native Americans much better than she did.
List?
Posted by Salviati
Member since Apr 2006
7189 posts
Posted on 3/4/21 at 2:23 pm to
I always like Costner in Fandango.

Or maybe I just really liked Fandango.
Posted by FearlessFreep
Baja Alabama
Member since Nov 2009
19591 posts
Posted on 3/4/21 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

you see more of the major at Fort Hayes who has lost his mind
I don't know that I'd want to see more of Major Fambrough's character. I thought the way the released film handled his brief appearance was perfect.

Initially, you see him seated behind his desk, and he appears very much an officer despite his somewhat unkempt appearance (it was the West, and those uniforms were probably pretty stifling). He regards Dunbar with the haughty disdain one would expect of someone who had, in his words, "ascended to this post".

It's only until he reaches for his desk drawer - and you hear the unmistakable clink of several empty bottles - that you realize he is hopelessly alcoholic, or worse. I thought it was very well done.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
69892 posts
Posted on 3/4/21 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

It's one part Little Big Man, two parts Fergully.


Or perhaps FernGully is two parts Dances With Wolves seeing as the latter film was released two years before the former.

quote:

Much like Titanic, it suffered from poor acting out of the romantic leads. The supporting cast, particularly the actors portraying natives, was excellent and really saved the movie (as the supporting cast attempted to do in Titanic and Armageddon).



I'm sure the two leads of Titanic were devasted at how they and the supporting cast failed to save the movie. It only scored 11 Academy Awards and $2.2 billion in box office revenue as it bombed its way through 14 straight weeks atop the box office.
Posted by TulaneUVA
Member since Jun 2005
26190 posts
Posted on 7/28/25 at 7:59 pm to
quote:

Would've been a more compelling film if it didn't portray the Natives as helpless pacifists. There was a concerted effort obviously to rebuke old Westerns and the antagonistic savage Indian but it went too far in neutering them.


Felt this way until o just finished watching extended cut. The scene they add about John seeing the wagon with chopped hand and hair from Indians killing white hunters showed their savagery due to incompatibilities
Posted by YumYum Sauce
Arkansas
Member since Nov 2010
9398 posts
Posted on 7/28/25 at 11:41 pm to
Final act of Goodfellas just isn't great. Find myself turning the channel about 70% through the movie.

Love DWW top to bottom.
Posted by LanierSpots
Sarasota, Florida
Member since Sep 2010
69931 posts
Posted on 7/29/25 at 4:14 am to
quote:

It’s top 3 for me.



I will not put it that high on my list but I love the movie. I love the music and the overall feel of it.

Ive watched it a lot of times and still cant pass it up


I dont break movies down as deep as some of you guys. It has good acting, a good background and makes me feel good. Im easily entertained


Posted by rebelrouser
Columbia, SC
Member since Feb 2013
12833 posts
Posted on 7/29/25 at 9:28 am to
quote:

Goodfellas is a cartoon compared to DWW


WTF? Goodfellas is a brilliant movie. Also, those complaining about making the natives too gentle and not warlike enough:



Remember that scene?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram