Started By
Message

re: Padres took out $50 million loan to cover payroll

Posted on 11/1/23 at 11:27 pm to
Posted by tzimme4
Metairie
Member since Jan 2008
33325 posts
Posted on 11/1/23 at 11:27 pm to
quote:

Juan Soto is a Yankees

Judge already plays RF bruh
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
69091 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 7:20 am to
Benito Santiago
Posted by RD Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
28287 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 8:16 am to
quote:

What is the issue? Padres ownership could do this every year for the next two decades, and still make a killing when they sell the team along with any debt.





Do what? That's not any type of way to run a business.
Posted by Goldrush25
San Diego, CA
Member since Oct 2012
33963 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 11:08 am to
quote:

Do what? That's not any type of way to run a business.



In the second paragraph the article states that MLB teams regularly utilize lines of credit to meet short-term financial obligations. There's reason to believe that the Padres have financial issues but this loan may have been taken out whether they have those issues or not.
This post was edited on 11/2/23 at 11:13 am
Posted by Team Vote
DFW
Member since Aug 2014
7955 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 11:57 am to
Trevor Hoffman
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
24213 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 12:50 pm to
They are 3rd highest payroll at $256 mil is that correct? So they are almost 20% underbudget? How is that possible? I get needing to take a loan to cover short term costs, but 20% of their entire year? That seems like very poor management or a huge short term move to win?
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
46425 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 1:35 pm to
Nate Colbert
Posted by artisticsavant
Member since Mar 2017
5436 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

Juan Soto is a Yankees.


The Padres will bring Geovany Soto out of retirement and try to convince people it's Juan.
Posted by Diseasefreeforall
Member since Oct 2012
7376 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

They are 3rd highest payroll at $256 mil is that correct? So they are almost 20% underbudget? How is that possible? I get needing to take a loan to cover short term costs, but 20% of their entire year? That seems like very poor management or a huge short term move to win?

They wanted a $100 million loan but due to their debt load MLB capped them at $50 million.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
70764 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 1:55 pm to
Every team will have to do this during the transition to streaming. A lot of the salary money comes from local/regional affiliates and tv broadcast contracts. John Skipper predicted it would start happening this year.
This post was edited on 11/2/23 at 1:59 pm
Posted by Basura Blanco
Member since Dec 2011
11747 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

Do what? That's not any type of way to run a business.


What business would you be comparing it too? It is a highly unique entity and virtual monopoly exempt from anti-trust laws with publicly provided infrastructure resulting in a valuation of nearly $2 Billion on a leveraged investment of only $800M 10 years ago. This increase in equity occurred in one of the most volatile 10 year periods in recent history. Ownership in MLB is a no lose proposition.
Posted by Undertow
Member since Sep 2016
9139 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 2:47 pm to
Ozzie Smith
Posted by BregmansWheelbarrow
Member since Mar 2020
3267 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

Baseball is dead


If baseball is dead, football is dead.
Posted by MikeD
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
8446 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 3:59 pm to
Gary Sheffield
Posted by EZE Tiger Fan
Member since Jul 2004
55454 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 4:04 pm to
Jim Leyritz

I know I spelled that wrong. Don’t care. frick that guy.
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
46425 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 6:18 pm to
Mike Ivie
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
150146 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 6:20 pm to
quote:


If baseball is dead, football is dead
what
Posted by BHTiger
Charleston
Member since Dec 2017
9265 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 7:53 pm to
quote:

They are 3rd highest payroll at $256 mil is that correct? So they are almost 20% underbudget? How is that possible? I get needing to take a loan to cover short term costs, but 20% of their entire year? That seems like very poor management or a huge short term move to win?


A lot more cost to running a team than just payroll...
Posted by RD Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
28287 posts
Posted on 11/3/23 at 9:26 pm to
quote:

This increase in equity occurred in one of the most volatile 10 year periods in recent history. Ownership in MLB is a no lose proposition.


And?

So why doesn't every team go into serious payroll debt every year knowing
they'll eventually get that return somehow down the road when the team is sold?

No serious MLB owner or GM is gonna run
a operation like that.

Ted Turner lost serious money running the Braves in the late 80's (one year had the highest payroll but worst record) but his losses were technically
on paper since he made a shitload from broadcasting the games on the Superstation.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram