Started By
Message

re: NCAA men’s and women’s tournament to expand to 76 teams.

Posted on 4/29/26 at 3:39 am to
Posted by thegambler
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2012
2152 posts
Posted on 4/29/26 at 3:39 am to
quote:

And this tournament increase is not going to benefit mid majors. It's going to be more mediocre high major teams added to pad payouts to power conferences


And if you finish 5th in your conference, you have already proven you're not the best team in the country. No need to see extra teams in the thing. Talk about meaningless regular season.
Posted by Stonehog
Platinum Rewards Club
Member since Aug 2011
34160 posts
Posted on 4/29/26 at 6:33 am to
quote:

Sports just keep getting dumber.


It’s guys throwing a ball in a hoop. People like to watch it. We’re not exactly curing cancer here.
Posted by UltimateHog
Thailand
Member since Dec 2011
69549 posts
Posted on 4/29/26 at 6:58 am to
I don't like it but it's just 4 more play-in games so who really cares? No one really considers the play-ins to be the actual tournament anyways which is still 64. Overblown.
Posted by McMillan
Member since Jul 2018
7288 posts
Posted on 4/29/26 at 10:30 am to
Greed killing yet another thing we love. News at 10.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
70811 posts
Posted on 4/29/26 at 3:04 pm to
What is the point? No low seed is going to win 8 straight games vs tourney level teams. This is retarded
Posted by Metaloctopus
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2018
6916 posts
Posted on 4/29/26 at 10:34 pm to
quote:

It’s guys throwing a ball in a hoop. People like to watch it. We’re not exactly curing cancer here.


If we were curing cancer, it wouldn't be dumb. What is your point?
Posted by CRDNLSCHMCPSN11
Member since Dec 2014
18416 posts
Posted on 4/29/26 at 11:11 pm to
As usual, more greed damages something that used to be perfect.
Posted by JoeyP239
Member since Nov 2025
1265 posts
Posted on 4/29/26 at 11:51 pm to
This would be a great idea if they actually seeded the first 52 teams 1 thru 13, then let the lower 24 have a play in for the seeds 14-16.

If you did it that way, there’d be no more Florida vs Miss Valley State in the 1st round as 16 seed. Instead a #1 seed would be getting a team (using this year as example) on the level of Boise State, assuming they knock out the trash low major auto bid conference winner.
Posted by SoDakHawk
South Dakota
Member since Jun 2014
10653 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 12:01 am to
This is so stupid. I had reservations about the First Four. Fine, have a few games but the Madness starts on Thursday.

This? Nope.
Posted by real turf fan
East Tennessee
Member since Dec 2016
11942 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 12:10 am to
quote:

More basketball!!!!


More mediocre basketball with near empty seats and games on minor pay-for-view stations that won't allow any showing of highlights on the TV stations where the never hear of them before colleges are located.

And that other series of post season games is just going to have even fewer named teams to choose from.
Posted by bgator85
Sarasota
Member since Aug 2007
6311 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 7:49 am to
quote:

This would be a great idea if they actually seeded the first 52 teams 1 thru 13, then let the lower 24 have a play in for the seeds 14-16.

If you did it that way, there’d be no more Florida vs Miss Valley State in the 1st round as 16 seed. Instead a #1 seed would be getting a team (using this year as example) on the level of Boise State, assuming they knock out the trash low major auto bid conference winner.


The benefit of being a top seed is playing one of those automatic qualifiers and having an easy first round game. If you won your conferences bid you shouldn't have to do more to work to participate in the primary tournament, you did your job already.

Let the last at large teams battle it out for the last spots in the tournament.
This post was edited on 4/30/26 at 7:54 am
Posted by Stonehog
Platinum Rewards Club
Member since Aug 2011
34160 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 9:15 am to
quote:

If we were curing cancer, it wouldn't be dumb. What is your point?


Sports are already dumb. It's supposed to be fun, it's not life or death.
Posted by JoeyP239
Member since Nov 2025
1265 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 10:06 am to
quote:

The benefit of being a top seed is playing one of those automatic qualifiers and having an easy first round game.


But you would still be getting the easiest possible game in the round of 64.

Why should automatic qualifiers get auto bids into the seeded tourney when better teams would have to win a game to get in?
Posted by bgator85
Sarasota
Member since Aug 2007
6311 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 10:20 am to
quote:

But you would still be getting the easiest possible game in the round of 64.

Why should automatic qualifiers get auto bids into the seeded tourney when better teams would have to win a game to get in?


Because the tournament is being expanded for the benefit of middling at large teams from power conferences. The automatic qualifiers are in this tournament whether there is expansion or not. Why should they have to do extra work?

Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
41046 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 10:36 am to
Tell me that this is a typo. The women's tournament is going to be 76 players. Right?
Posted by crash1211
Houma
Member since May 2008
3721 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 10:36 am to
quote:

Should still be 64


It wouldn't bother me if they went back to 48 or 53
This post was edited on 4/30/26 at 10:39 am
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
37085 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 11:26 am to
quote:

fricking dumb. Especially the women.


Some of those first round women's games are going to be incredible in the worst way possible

But I just want to make sure Wisconsin can still lose to the 12 seed in the first round in this new version of the tourney.
This post was edited on 4/30/26 at 11:27 am
Posted by TejasHorn
High Plains Driftin'
Member since Mar 2007
11631 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 9:29 pm to
They’re just following the Texas HS football model. So many classes and divisions you have teams with 2 or 3 wins making the playoffs.

I think there was a year recently when a team with zero wins got in.
Posted by Metaloctopus
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2018
6916 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 10:39 pm to
quote:

Sports are already dumb. It's supposed to be fun, it's not life or death.


Apparently you don't get the point any of us are making. This isn't "fun". It's making what was once an interesting tournament, a watered down bore fest. And it cheapens the regular season. Your non-sequiturs about not being life or death do not add any value.
Posted by Deplorableinohio
Member since Dec 2018
7931 posts
Posted on 5/1/26 at 6:37 am to
Terrible, especially for women.

Outside the top four or five, there are simply not enough competitive teams to play for a national championship.

A better idea for women is to have five or seven game series for the four best teams, and have an NIT like tournament for the other 72.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram