Favorite team:LSU 
Location:Louisiana
Biography:I'm a dad, I am currently 32 years old, and searching for the fountain of youth... Well I just looked and it wasn't there, so nevermind on the fountain of youth. I love talking sports, and I enjoy the occasional political debate.
Interests:All things LSU, drums, guitar, shooting pool and other random things that aren't worth listing.
Occupation:
Number of Posts:6387
Registered on:11/1/2018
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

I think it should go back to 12 teams. There is no reason for all 16 teams to be there.


Indeed there isn't. I miss when it was 8 teams. But 12 should absolutely be the limit.

The strength of the conference might make having more than 8 necessary now (it wasn't necessary when they first expanded it, in my opinion) but 16 is nuts. I'd rather not even have a conference tournament if we're going to cheapen it that much.

He and Cowan have both been our Jared Bradford (more like Louis Coleman, who carried on that role, and was better at it) all year. So my answer is yes.
I saw the same ending that they did, and yet somehow they saw a completely different thing. No one "charged" their dugout. A handful of players took a few steps toward their dugout and were saying some things.

I could do without any of the antics from either side, personally, but of all fan bases to be getting upset about it. Their program is the one who has popularized this behavior.
If people had a problem with Angel because of her skin color (we're all the same "race") then they would have to hate the whole team, and pretty much every basketball or football team.

Her behavior is what brings her criticism. Period. Same reason people don't like Dawn Staley.
I thought Tennessee was pretty lucky for most of last night's game. They scored two runs in the 4th by getting three consecutive bloop hits. And that was all they had until the 7th, so that was very frustrating. Then we just gave up by bringing anyone but Cowan or Evans into the game. I don't like saying it, and I know they can't pitch every game, but you just can't trust anyone else.

If you're going to make that decision to punt that game last night, by hoping for a different result from guys who haven't been reliable, then no one but Cowan or Evans should touch the ball on the mound today. Cowan threw all of 12 pitches or so, and has had a day off now, and Evans, of course, hasn't pitched yet. So let's not get cute and try to bridge the gap. Both of these guys have gone 3 or 4 innings many times this year, and Cowan was a starter before he got here, and could probably get us through 5 of those innings today.

If those guys don't have it, for any reason, you live with it. But there's no reason to mess around with anyone else.

I just do not understand how every year, we get worse at throwing strikes. I've followed baseball, and college baseball, for a pretty long time now, and it was never like this. We had good staffs, decent staffs, and even bad staffs. But never do I ever remember any LSU staff being as inept at simply throwing the ball over the plate, as this team has been since Jay got here. I know it can't possibly be true, but it's almost like there is no emphasis placed on command, and we're just working with guys on how to throw the ball as hard as possible. We had enough guys step up in '23 to make it work in the end (and an offense that didn't disappear), but we didn't have enough the other years, and we're still waiting on someone else to step up this year.

Jay's first year didn't have very good starting pitching, but had a fair amount of guys who were at least competitive out of the pen. Still way too many walks, though, and it just gets worse every year. I guess I'm rambling to myself now. It's just frustrating to watch this play out again and again.
quote:

Correct. Losing 5 or 6 like Mainieri used to does affect you enough to somewhat be concerned. However, we haven’t done that this year. We have 1 quad 3 loss and 1 quad 4 loss. So no I disagree it doesn’t matter if we have an RPI of 6 or 12 at this point in the season. It’ll work itself out over the next 3 weekends. LSU is said to have a lead on Auburn from a top 8 standpoint and Auburn has an RPI of 3 lol. Bama at 10 also has a lower shot than LSU.


You say all of this based on the assumption that LSU plays well down the stretch. This upcoming schedule is no guarantee to end well, and every game matters. If we look up and LSU has finished strong, we can say this loss didn't hurt, but since none of us can see the future, it never makes sense to say it doesn't matter.
quote:

How about you use some common sense in that big melon head and realize what you said. Why would anybody imagine losing more games when they haven’t. You are just making up a false scenario for your argument but yea he needs common sense. That game does not matter if they take care of business this weekend


I don't have a melon head, and you clearly haven't tried very hard to think about what I said. How many times over the years has LSU lost multiple midweek games, only for people to say "it doesn't matter". By that logic, we could lose them all, and it wouldn't matter. Of course it matters. That;s why they play the game.

Try a little harder before running your mouth.
quote:

The RPI drop truly doesn’t matter. We have 3 quad 1 series remaining. The RPI will work itself out based on our record the next 3 weeks. The game Tuesday wasn’t even our worst loss from an RPI standpoint. And pretty much every SEC team has a worse loss.


Use a little common sense. If it affected our RPI that much with one loss, imagine losing several of these like we used to do under Mainieri. It adds up, unless you win 20 conference games, if you want to be a top 8 seed. So yes, it matters.
I don't care about any excuses, and who thinks it doesn't matter, or who the next opponent is. I care about that loss. As a fan, I don't ever want to get beat, much less run-ruled by a severely inferior opponent.

If I played in that game, I would be utterly embarrassed. You can deal with losses and move on. But you can't be a winning team if you can lose like that and it doesn't bother you. So I should hope that everyone on that team cares about that loss, even if some fans don't.
That's for the "these games don't matter" crowd.

I couldn't be a teammate of a person who believes that.
quote:

everyone shitting on Gilbert but no one seems to understand that you can improve. This was her first year in a new system


The lack of letting someone else shoot the ball started to become a problem as the season went on with her. That has to improve more than anything else.

re: Northwestern 13 @ LSU 3 Final

Posted by Metaloctopus on 4/22/25 at 6:38 pm
quote:

I bet Dorsey pitches more than one inning tonight. What happened to Woods and Fontenot?


Don't know. This is two years in a row that Woods got one or two appearances and got put in the shed. I guess it's going badly in bullpen sessions, unless there are injuries that no one is talking about.

re: Northwestern 13 @ LSU 3 Final

Posted by Metaloctopus on 4/22/25 at 6:32 pm
quote:

not sure why I thought Reynolds, but i mean Thompson. he's the only guy who hasn't pitched yet besides Jake brown and guidry.


I'm not terribly excited about what Thompson has shown in scrimmages, and the fact that the coaches apparently don't trust him enough to put him in a game. I am, however, confused as to why we have seen so little of Dorsey. He's an experienced arm with pretty decent stuff. I know he was hurt to start the year, but he's been back for a while now and still has barely pitched.

re: Northwestern 13 @ LSU 3 Final

Posted by Metaloctopus on 4/22/25 at 6:27 pm
quote:

Wait…who is Reynolds?


I was wondering the same, but then I remembered Russell Reynolds.

Then I remembered what year it is. And now I feel old and confused.

re: Northwestern 13 @ LSU 3 Final

Posted by Metaloctopus on 4/22/25 at 6:05 pm
Jared is one of those folks who kinda has a resting sad face. There's a number of them on this team. As long as they're smiling when they head back to the dugout, all is well.


:lol: Someone downvoted the idea of people being happy walking back to the dugout. I guess people can disagree with anything.
It's comforting to know that we did nothing about the bullpen in the off season, and now we're throwing a bullpen game.

Why don't billionaires who like to win want this team? Why must we be stuck with some ghost ownership group who likes to make money, but hates to spend it?

re: RIP Mike Patrick

Posted by Metaloctopus on 4/22/25 at 5:33 pm
My fondest memories of him were when he called College World Series games. Always seemed like a genuinely nice guy.
The Braves didn't play "great ball" all year last year. They looked pretty bad for much of it, and couldn't get any rest for their rotation down the stretch, just trying to make it in. And then had to go on the road, because they finished as the second wild card. All of those things could have been avoided by winning more games in the regular season.

No one is arguing that winning in October matters more. You are the only one who is even bringing that discussion in. We're saying that every game matters, because they all count in the standings, and 105 wins is certainly better than 88, if 88 doesn't get you in, or even if it does, you get stuck with a bad draw.

Yes the intensity picks up later in the year. That doesn't mean it matters more. It just means it's getting late and teams are feeling the pressure. But intensity doesn't make one game count as two.
quote:

Games lost in April count the exact same as games lost in September. They miss the playoffs this year by 2 games and you’ll be singing a different tune about that atrocious start.


Exactly. I have never understood the crowd who claims that early games mean nothing. Then why play them? Let's just have an 81 game season, so that we're only playing the "meaningful" second half games. But then, the goal posts would move, and games in July wouldn't matter, and we'd be talking about games only mattering midway through August, I guess. I watch enough college baseball to know that's exactly what happens. 56 game schedule, and people say it doesn't matter til mid April.

Every game is counted in the standings. And starting 5-13 has put the Braves in a whole that will take a long time to climb out of. Because of that start, they can't afford a late season slump and back into the playoffs. Obviously, they can and will have a bad series sometimes, but every month has to be a winning record from here on out, most likely.
quote:

Everyone freaking out when we got swept by possibly the 2 best teams in the sport to start is just funny now. Sure, the Braves aren’t a top tier team right now. But all that matters is making the playoffs and then go from there. We are definitely at the top of tier 2 which will prove itself over the next 145 games. Then it’s about health and who gots hot


If those are the teams the Braves have to beat to win a World Series (and they are obviously among those teams), then the goal should be to do a little better than losing every single game against them to start the season.

And look, I'm just glad to be winning, at all, right now. All you can do is win the games at hand, and so this is really nice. But we are certainly not playing very good teams right now, so I'm not sure it's chest beating time. Streaky lineup needs to show consistency, the bullpen still needs work, and we need a healthy Strider and for Chris Sale to remember how to locate his pitches, if this team is to really contend in the long run.

Who knows what to expect from Holmes and Smith-Shawver through an entire season, but the big guns have to come through.