Started By
Message

re: MLB is proposing a salary floor of $171.2 million and a salary cap of $245.3 million

Posted on 9/15/26 at 7:24 pm to
Posted by Murray
Member since Aug 2008
14906 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 7:24 pm to
quote:

OTOH, the Mets are expensive and a goddamn dumpster fire.


Eat shite. They’ve been doing pretty well once it didn’t matter anymore.
Posted by Floating Change Up
Member since Dec 2013
13254 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 9:16 pm to
Does the budget expenditures for trash cans count against the cap?

Asking for a friend.
Posted by TROLA
BATON ROUGE
Member since Apr 2004
15092 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 9:29 pm to
They are pitting the 12 against the 8.. they’ve set the celling at 250… smart starting point IMO..
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
54482 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 10:30 pm to
quote:

They’ve been doing pretty well once it didn’t matter anymore.

Posted by Tomherman
Member since Sep 2016
2108 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 10:41 pm to
Calling jerry a friend?
Posted by WhiteMandingo
Member since Jan 2016
8393 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 11:14 pm to
75% of the player should not be affected by this hell they will make more in the smaller markets.
The 25% are going to get crushed but they are union and the union is a majority system
The mets have 3 players that eat exactly 1/2 of the supposed cap????
Posted by OU Guy
Member since Feb 2022
36329 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 12:10 am to
quote:

Would teams have to reduce their payrolls for the 2027 season? How does that work for a team that has multiple guys under long-term deals?


I would think they’d grandfather them in as contracts expire and limit new signing costs until reach cap window. Lots of way it could be done.
Posted by Tiger Ugly
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
19733 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 7:33 am to
they are predictably starting low on the cap knowing full well they will have to eventually go up significantly - and that will make it appear as though they are going above and beyond to compromise.
Posted by The Third Leg
Idiot Out Wandering Around
Member since May 2014
13104 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 7:41 am to
quote:

Kinda insane that teams that spend $60 million are actually supposed to try to compete with teams spending $300 million.

College football is turning itself into MLB, following the worst performing league in modern times.
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
64911 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 7:49 am to
quote:

The Marlins and Indians have the lowest payrolls in baseball but are fairly competitive so far this season.

OTOH, the Mets are expensive and a goddamn dumpster fire.


It ain’t what you spend but how you spend it.


But what revenue is generated from either of those teams? Thats the final judgment. Win games all you want, but if nobody pays to go to the games, buys your merchandise, etc. Then what does it matter?


The Dallas Cowboys are the only NFC team that hasnt gone to the NFC championship since 2010 yet they're, by far, the most financially successful.

Does this model bring in more overall revenue? Can the game of baseball expand beyond where it is now?
This post was edited on 9/16/26 at 7:51 am
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
56064 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 7:56 am to
quote:

Would teams have to reduce their payrolls for the 2027 season? How does that work for a team that has multiple guys under long-term deals?


You could ease into a cap… current contracts don’t have to count against it
Posted by Wayne Campbell
Aurora, IL
Member since Oct 2011
7591 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 8:08 am to
quote:


You could ease into a cap… current contracts don’t have to count against it


Everyone pisses and moans about the Dodgers buying championships. Not counting current contracts against the cap would only exacerbate that issue.
Posted by UltimateHog
Thailand
Member since Dec 2011
70136 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 8:19 am to
Seems a little high considering the NBA's floor is $148M this season. I would have assumed somewhere around $150M.
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
51877 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 10:42 am to
quote:

Seems a little high considering the NBA's floor is $148M this season
the NBA and the MLB have drastically different revenues and expenses. A specific number has zero relevance
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
63345 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 11:00 am to
quote:

Everyone pisses and moans about the Dodgers buying championships. Not counting current contracts against the cap would only exacerbate that issue.


I agree with you 100%. However, can you legally force a player to take a reduction in pay from a previous signed contract?
Posted by UltimateHog
Thailand
Member since Dec 2011
70136 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 11:15 am to
Actually they don't that's why I used them.

NBA 2025 revenue: 14bn
MLB 2025 revenue: 13bn
quote:

NBA Revenue: ~US $14 billion (positioning it as the world's second-richest sports league behind the NFL).

MLB Revenue: ~US $12 to $13 billion (historically comparable, though recent estimates place total league-wide figures just behind or neck-and-neck with the NBA)


Posted by A Menace to Sobriety
Member since Jun 2018
33191 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 11:19 am to
This is a very fair deal from the MLB, but the players are obviously going to reject this just based off of principal alone. No one ever accepts first offers.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
487944 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 11:24 am to
quote:

I agree with you 100%. However, can you legally force a player to take a reduction in pay from a previous signed contract?

They'd have to be traded, like what you see in the NFL/NBA with bad contracts
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
151499 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 11:30 am to
That doesn't address players with 10/5 or no trade clauses

Existing contracts will stay in place and will either impact teams going forward with new contracts, or there will be easing, or there will be an NBA style soft cap
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
105635 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 11:36 am to
quote:

or there will be an NBA style soft cap


I can see this happening, with spenders paying the tax still while teams at the floor collect revenue sharing.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram