Started By
Message

re: How legit was the movie Moneyball

Posted on 5/26/23 at 8:53 pm to
Posted by ShaneTheLegLechler
Member since Dec 2011
63407 posts
Posted on 5/26/23 at 8:53 pm to
What parts of this are being intentionally manipulated to suppress player salaries?
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
150146 posts
Posted on 5/26/23 at 8:54 pm to
Don't really see how that proves that offense is down in the era of analytics
This post was edited on 5/26/23 at 8:56 pm
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
70764 posts
Posted on 5/26/23 at 8:55 pm to
I posted the article explaining it. All you do is deflect and poorly try to play gotcha.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
70764 posts
Posted on 5/26/23 at 8:56 pm to
The numbers prove it and those are easy to find
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
150146 posts
Posted on 5/26/23 at 8:56 pm to
So please, provide them
Posted by grizzlylongcut
Member since Sep 2021
15442 posts
Posted on 5/26/23 at 8:57 pm to
quote:

Not saying Beane's method is full of shite, but it seems like there is way more to that story.


I think it is.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
70764 posts
Posted on 5/26/23 at 8:58 pm to
Posted by ShaneTheLegLechler
Member since Dec 2011
63407 posts
Posted on 5/26/23 at 8:58 pm to
So no answer? Just a link to some article in “The Nation” which is some fart sniffing lib rag?
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
70764 posts
Posted on 5/26/23 at 8:59 pm to
You’re pathetic, a “lib rag” attacking a lib league? Yea makes a lot of sense dipshit.
This post was edited on 5/26/23 at 9:00 pm
Posted by ShaneTheLegLechler
Member since Dec 2011
63407 posts
Posted on 5/26/23 at 9:01 pm to
I mean, it is. That’s not relevant I guess but also not even debatable.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
150146 posts
Posted on 5/26/23 at 9:04 pm to
So runs on a per game basis continue to compare really well to basically every single post war era of baseball outside of the insanity of the steroid era. Thanks
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
70764 posts
Posted on 5/26/23 at 9:07 pm to
The MLB is woke. Why would a “lib rag” write a hit piece on the financial practices of their own? You don’t make any sense.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
70764 posts
Posted on 5/26/23 at 9:09 pm to
No, they’ve declined since the widespread implementation of analytics. You can’t argue the proof so you deflect with false statements like always.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477055 posts
Posted on 5/26/23 at 9:13 pm to
quote:

LINK


From 1992 to 1952, how many seasons had a lower runs/game than 2023?
Posted by ShaneTheLegLechler
Member since Dec 2011
63407 posts
Posted on 5/26/23 at 9:14 pm to
Because it’s seen as pro labor/union in their eyes. Having an identity crisis since you realize what you linked? You should sample some of the other great work like “Fox’s Lies Are the Folklore of Racial Capitalism”
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477055 posts
Posted on 5/26/23 at 9:14 pm to
quote:

The MLB is woke

quote:

Why would a “lib rag” write a hit piece on the financial practices of their own?


quote:

You don’t make any sense.


ironic.gif
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
70764 posts
Posted on 5/26/23 at 9:15 pm to
So now we’re just excluding any year or years that don’t support our arguments? Mine is a hard fact with proof regardless of how ignorant and incorrect West is about the steroid era.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
150146 posts
Posted on 5/26/23 at 9:16 pm to
quote:

they’ve declined since the widespread implementation of analytics


Runs per game from the 80s: 4.29
Runs per game over the last 10 years: 4.45
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
70764 posts
Posted on 5/26/23 at 9:17 pm to
Keep deflecting if you want. It doesn’t change your hypocrisy and constant deflections when facts are presented.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477055 posts
Posted on 5/26/23 at 9:17 pm to
quote:

So now we’re just excluding any year or years


How many years are there in this sample?

quote:

From 1992 to 1952,


Nobody was arguing that scoring didn't go up in the 90s and early 00s due to steroids. Is your argument solely a 10-year sample when scoring went way up due to juicing? And you are trying to argue my 40-year sample is irrelevant?
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram