- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 5/26/23 at 8:54 pm to Madking
Don't really see how that proves that offense is down in the era of analytics
This post was edited on 5/26/23 at 8:56 pm
Posted on 5/26/23 at 8:55 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
I posted the article explaining it. All you do is deflect and poorly try to play gotcha.
Posted on 5/26/23 at 8:56 pm to WestCoastAg
The numbers prove it and those are easy to find
Posted on 5/26/23 at 8:57 pm to West Palm Tiger561
quote:
Not saying Beane's method is full of shite, but it seems like there is way more to that story.
I think it is.
Posted on 5/26/23 at 8:58 pm to Madking
So no answer? Just a link to some article in “The Nation” which is some fart sniffing lib rag?
Posted on 5/26/23 at 8:59 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
You’re pathetic, a “lib rag” attacking a lib league? Yea makes a lot of sense dipshit.
This post was edited on 5/26/23 at 9:00 pm
Posted on 5/26/23 at 9:01 pm to Madking
I mean, it is. That’s not relevant I guess but also not even debatable.
Posted on 5/26/23 at 9:04 pm to Madking
So runs on a per game basis continue to compare really well to basically every single post war era of baseball outside of the insanity of the steroid era. Thanks
Posted on 5/26/23 at 9:07 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
The MLB is woke. Why would a “lib rag” write a hit piece on the financial practices of their own? You don’t make any sense.
Posted on 5/26/23 at 9:09 pm to WestCoastAg
No, they’ve declined since the widespread implementation of analytics. You can’t argue the proof so you deflect with false statements like always.
Posted on 5/26/23 at 9:13 pm to Madking
quote:
LINK
From 1992 to 1952, how many seasons had a lower runs/game than 2023?
Posted on 5/26/23 at 9:14 pm to Madking
Because it’s seen as pro labor/union in their eyes. Having an identity crisis since you realize what you linked? You should sample some of the other great work like “Fox’s Lies Are the Folklore of Racial Capitalism”
Posted on 5/26/23 at 9:14 pm to Madking
quote:
The MLB is woke
quote:
Why would a “lib rag” write a hit piece on the financial practices of their own?
quote:
You don’t make any sense.
ironic.gif
Posted on 5/26/23 at 9:15 pm to SlowFlowPro
So now we’re just excluding any year or years that don’t support our arguments? Mine is a hard fact with proof regardless of how ignorant and incorrect West is about the steroid era.
Posted on 5/26/23 at 9:16 pm to Madking
quote:
they’ve declined since the widespread implementation of analytics
Runs per game from the 80s: 4.29
Runs per game over the last 10 years: 4.45
Posted on 5/26/23 at 9:17 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
Keep deflecting if you want. It doesn’t change your hypocrisy and constant deflections when facts are presented.
Posted on 5/26/23 at 9:17 pm to Madking
quote:
So now we’re just excluding any year or years
How many years are there in this sample?
quote:
From 1992 to 1952,
Nobody was arguing that scoring didn't go up in the 90s and early 00s due to steroids. Is your argument solely a 10-year sample when scoring went way up due to juicing? And you are trying to argue my 40-year sample is irrelevant?
Popular
Back to top



1





