Started By
Message

re: ESPN to reduce emphasis on College Football Playoff, to focus coverage on more schools

Posted on 6/18/21 at 12:29 pm to
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
46881 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

ESPN to reduce emphasis on College Football Playoff, to focus coverage on more schools


Too late. Can't put the toothpaste back in the tube.
Posted by Cowboyfan89
Member since Sep 2015
12931 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

I used to love watching the bowl games when there were legit top 10 matchups

Please define how the Top 10 matchups that have occurred since the inception of the CFP have differed from the Top 10 matchups that occurred during the BCS Era.
Posted by Them
Metry
Member since Nov 2008
11269 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 12:46 pm to
COLLEGE GAMEDAY IN BOZEMAN/MISSOULA FOR BRAWL OF THE WILD


MAKE IT HAPPEN
Posted by Cowboyfan89
Member since Sep 2015
12931 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

COLLEGE GAMEDAY IN BOZEMAN/MISSOULA FOR BRAWL OF THE WILD


MAKE IT HAPPEN

I mean, let's be honest here. It would be pretty cool if they would go to more than one FCS game a year. There are some big time FCS matchups that would be good environments for College Gameday.

It would be a breath of fresh air from the same stadiums every year.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
68384 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 1:16 pm to
See, you don’t get it. In the social media age, the commentary IS the content!

What you think of as content, i.e. games, and the analysis, highlights, and prognostications that surround those games, aren’t really what moves the needle anymore for advertisers. Advertisement in the social media age is all about reactions, shares, follows/subscriptions, and interactions. The games and analysis are only to get people online to comment, react, or share. It’s not about having an opinion that makes sense, educate people on strategies, or trying to explain the nuances of the game. It’s just about trying to get a specific reaction out of people.

Hot takes mean clicks, clicks mean reactions, reactions mean shares and comments. That interaction is how they make money.

Thus, all of the “analysis” in sports has boiled down to:
1. Shilling for sponsors
2. Cross promoting events on the same network
3. Virtue signaling progressive values
4. Making fans angry so they’ll comment about how angry they are

If it doesn’t serve one of those 4 purposes, it likely doesn’t make the broadcast.
Posted by GoldenGuy
Member since Oct 2015
12464 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

Please define how the Top 10 matchups that have occurred since the inception of the CFP have differed from the Top 10 matchups that occurred during the BCS Era.


The games meant everything in the BCS Era.

LSU jumped to the #2 spot in 2007 because they beat Virginia Tech. Everyone else losing that weekend was helpful.
Posted by TheTideMustRoll
Birmingham, AL
Member since Dec 2009
9614 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

See, you don’t get it. In the social media age, the commentary IS the content!

What you think of as content, i.e. games, and the analysis, highlights, and prognostications that surround those games, aren’t really what moves the needle anymore for advertisers. Advertisement in the social media age is all about reactions, shares, follows/subscriptions, and interactions. The games and analysis are only to get people online to comment, react, or share. It’s not about having an opinion that makes sense, educate people on strategies, or trying to explain the nuances of the game. It’s just about trying to get a specific reaction out of people.

Hot takes mean clicks, clicks mean reactions, reactions mean shares and comments. That interaction is how they make money.

Thus, all of the “analysis” in sports has boiled down to:
1. Shilling for sponsors
2. Cross promoting events on the same network
3. Virtue signaling progressive values
4. Making fans angry so they’ll comment about how angry they are

If it doesn’t serve one of those 4 purposes, it likely doesn’t make the broadcast.


A brilliant post. If you replace the word "sports" with the word "media" it remains correct. All media, of all genres, seeks only to provoke now, not to inform or entertain.
Posted by EZE Tiger Fan
Member since Jul 2004
54358 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 1:55 pm to
As long as my TV doesn't unmute itself, I don't care.
Posted by Torbraydo
Member since May 2021
498 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 1:58 pm to
I would like to be able to watch a VOLS game every once in a while without half the broadcast being centered around Alabama, Clemson, and the road to the playoffs.
Posted by Horsemeat
Truckin' somewhere in the US
Member since Dec 2014
14383 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 2:04 pm to
quote:

COLLEGE GAMEDAY IN BOZEMAN/MISSOULA FOR BRAWL OF THE WILD


Definitely need to do it in Missoula - the scenery out there is absolutely phenomenal. It's where I plan on retiring.
Posted by WMTigerFAN
Ouachita
Member since Feb 2005
4674 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 2:20 pm to
I would be perfectly okay with no announcers, just graphics, with natural sound. They should experiment with that.
Posted by Cowboyfan89
Member since Sep 2015
12931 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

The games meant everything in the BCS Era.

LSU jumped to the #2 spot in 2007 because they beat Virginia Tech. Everyone else losing that weekend was helpful.

1) He was talking about Top 10 Matchups in Bowl Games. Nothing has changed about that. His whole argument has been that the CFP ruined all the other bowl games, which it hasn't. Not directly anyway.
2) Nothing about the Playoff has changed those Top 10 matchups during the season. There weren't a ton of Top 10 nonconference matchups even during the BCS Era.
3) LSU was already #2 going into that game, and didn't go to #1 until beating #12 South Carolina in week 4.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
68384 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 3:37 pm to
Besides, this thread is about their coverage, not game broadcast selection, being more tailored towards all the schools and not just the CFB playoff. This is a good thing. Last year, it was nauseating to watch College Gameday and halftime shows and postgame shows because all they seemed to talk about were the playoffs and what order Alabama, Clemson, and Ohio State were in. I’d try to watch halftime shows and postgame shows to get the highlights of the other games and you’d get nothing but playoff talk. I’d listen to gameday to try and get some breakdowns of the big conference rivalries during rivalry week, and there was almost nothing about those games other than Alabama, Ohio State, Clemson, etc.

I have complained mightily about ESPN’s CFB coverage the past few years being far too playoff centric. Hopefully, this changes now.
Posted by FulshearTiger
Member since Jul 2015
5287 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 3:39 pm to
quote:


No. There really isn’t. If LSU is playing on Hulu, and you put Texas State vs North Texas on ESPN…I’m watching LSU. I’m not going to watch two shitty teams over a good team just because you want to be “fair” to the little guys.


You're an idiot and completely missed the entire point of the article.
Posted by chinese58
NELA. after 30 years in Dallas.
Member since Jun 2004
31807 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 7:34 pm to
Screw that. Now that my team is likely to be one of the teams in it, I want nothing to change. Talk about my team and 12 more during every bowl game, during every College Football Live show, and during the whole offseason. That's what we want. That's what we need!

OU and OSU are only there because of the conferences they play in.

OU is 0-4 in CF Playoff games, and they are the only team from the Big XII that's been invited..
The Big 10 is 3-4.

If it stayed at four, something would need to change on how teams get invited.
Posted by stlslick
St.Louis,Mo
Member since Nov 2012
14570 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 8:44 pm to
bullshite

talking about those teams gets the eyeballs of bigger fan bases.

they literally have a circle jerk to those 4 at espn during the commercial breaks.
Posted by SECdragonmaster
Order of the Dragons
Member since Dec 2013
17178 posts
Posted on 6/19/21 at 5:32 am to
quote:

That's a hell of a lot better than last year's "Welcome to halftime of a 10-10 game between Auburn and Tennessee. So fellas? What do you think of Alabama and Clemson's chances at making the playoff?"


Exactly.

You could be watching the Miss State vs Ole Miss game and the announcers are rambling on about how great of a coach nic sabben is and how long do they think he will continue in the game.
Posted by Woodreaux
OC California
Member since Jan 2008
2790 posts
Posted on 6/19/21 at 6:36 am to
quote:

what makes college football great


Top-10 Non-Conference games in September.

The regular season has a job that it has not been doing worth a shite: eliminating undefeated teams before season's end.

If multiple P5 champs are finishing undefeated or with only 1 loss, then we have a problem with the regular season. Fix that ( grow it, add dynamic scheduling, mid-season perfect record ruining invitational tournaments ) first, then once the ratings of the regular season improve then consider revising the post-season.
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
68283 posts
Posted on 6/19/21 at 7:25 am to
quote:

Im shocked they have realized this.


Same. I’m sure they’ll frick it up and end up making it racial in some way.
Posted by LooseCannon22282
Mobile
Member since May 2008
34746 posts
Posted on 6/19/21 at 9:13 am to
quote:

As long as my TV doesn't unmute itself, I don't care.



first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram