Started By
Message

Aggravated: 75% of my money is tied up in qualified plans.

Posted on 7/3/24 at 6:42 pm
Posted by Covingtontiger77
Member since Dec 2015
10936 posts
Posted on 7/3/24 at 6:42 pm
I’ve had enough with the rat race.

So I added up all my qualified plan assets: ROTH, IRAs, 401k etc.

Nice amount in there to where I and the wife could live very comfortably off 5% interest on the principal (without ever touching the principal balance).

Thing that pisses me off is that we can’t touch any of this money without a penalty due to age.

Bastards have us until at least 59.5

I realize now these pieces of shite put this 55 yr age min on purpose so they can chain us to a job and continue contributing to SS until at least 59.5

There is no such thing as early retirement if you tie up all of your money in qualified plans.

On top of that, I don’t want to contribute to SS any longer. I’ve done my 40 quarters and then some.

I would gladly take less a payout at say 55 if that meant I could get off this work train.

Yeah I’m tired and have had enough.

I want my money now.

So where’s the off the ramp for those that lived frugally, saved, saved early on and have had enough?

This post was edited on 7/3/24 at 7:07 pm
Posted by UltimaParadox
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2008
47403 posts
Posted on 7/3/24 at 7:00 pm to
So you took advantage of the qualified plans to save taxes. But now you don't want to pay the taxes or penalties for going against the deal

No one is stopping you from paying the penalty or saving outside of these plans.

But you knew the rules before going in, if you want to retire early there were steps you could have taken. Nothing is stopping you
Posted by Fat Bastard
2024 NFL pick'em champion
Member since Mar 2009
82523 posts
Posted on 7/3/24 at 7:03 pm to
i hear ya. it's why i have always said people need something else cash flowing now. whether rentals, taxable brokerage accounts, lending, trading, other businesses, etc. you want multiple streams of income.

most people are screwed until 59.5 before they can withdraw.

maybe you can trry this
Posted by HarveyBanger
Member since Mar 2018
1222 posts
Posted on 7/3/24 at 7:03 pm to
Brokerage account is the answer. It may be too late for you now.

Keep working or pay the fees
Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
24880 posts
Posted on 7/3/24 at 7:28 pm to
Rule of 55..
Posted by tigeryat
God's Country
Member since Oct 2005
2951 posts
Posted on 7/3/24 at 7:39 pm to
Learn about substantially equal periodic payments. They may be closer to the amount you need than you you think.
Posted by iknowmorethanyou
Paydirt
Member since Jul 2007
6593 posts
Posted on 7/3/24 at 10:12 pm to
72(t)
Posted by TorchtheFlyingTiger
1st coast
Member since Jan 2008
2683 posts
Posted on 7/3/24 at 11:16 pm to
Roth conversion ladder, Rule of 55, 72(t), Roth contributions all means to access without penalty pre 59.5.

Besides, you can live off other assets drawing from them at a larger % as long as there is enough to last until you access retirement accounts and the overall rate of withdrawal is below your safe withdrawal rate (SWR).
Posted by Lgrnwd
Member since Jan 2018
6920 posts
Posted on 7/4/24 at 12:46 pm to
Are you sure the 10% penalty is a deal breaker? Depending on how much you have in there and your intended retirement lifestyle, it could be possible to absorb that penalty and still retire early. Just a thought.

But yes the early withdrawal penalty is BS.
Posted by LSUSports247
Member since Apr 2007
863 posts
Posted on 7/4/24 at 1:02 pm to
I don’t care how much I had, I wouldn’t want to give the government an extra 10%
Posted by Fat Bastard
2024 NFL pick'em champion
Member since Mar 2009
82523 posts
Posted on 7/4/24 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

I don’t care how much I had, I wouldn’t want to give the government an extra 10%


me either. not now. i did it once like 21 years ago. had 5k in a 401k. cashed it out. paid taxes and penalty. did not care then on that small amount.

now? different ballgame.
Posted by nola tiger lsu
Member since Nov 2007
6279 posts
Posted on 7/4/24 at 11:22 pm to
quote:

There is no such thing as early retirement if you tie up all of your money in qualified plans.



Sounds like you didnt plan.

I should be able to retire at 50
Posted by Thundercles
Mars
Member since Sep 2010
6051 posts
Posted on 7/4/24 at 11:41 pm to
How old are you?
quote:

I would gladly take less a payout at say 55 if that meant I could get off this work train.

If you have the money you can just pay the taxes and penalties and ride it out. Or put all your energy and money into getting you enough to cover the gap.
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
30142 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 9:40 am to
quote:

But yes the early withdrawal penalty is BS.

I probably disdain the federal government more than anyone on this board, but from a pragmatic perspective, not really. The reason you're given tax free treatment is as an incentive to save for your own retirement. If you could just pull the money anytime you wanted, only having to pay the taxes you would have originally owed, it would no longer be a retirement vessel; it would simply be an investment vessel. Now sure, one can argue that they should be able to "retire" whenever they want, but the reality is that for every 50 year old that actually manages to retire at 50, there will be a dozen jackasses who are back to being greeters at Walmart in their 70s.

The Feds have laid out the rules pretty cleanly if you want to get the tax advantages of their retirement scheme. If you don't want to follow those rules, you're free to invest for retirement "normally". But taking advantage of the tax free growth and then complaining that the requirements to do so don't precisely fit what you want to do isn't particularly reasonable, in my opinion.
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
22516 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 9:40 am to
Can't you take our your Roth contributions at any time?

OP needs to stop sky screaming and meet with a CPA to figure out his options, probably could be retired already with better planning.

You can't avoid paying taxes without some sort of penalty. I mean come on now, that racket would be taken advantage of and ended immediately.
Posted by nola tiger lsu
Member since Nov 2007
6279 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

but the reality is that for every 50 year old that actually manages to retire at 50, there will be a dozen jackasses who are back to being greeters at Walmart in their 70s.


Some people are fine with that, a low stress job to supplement the money you earned from your high stress corporate rat race gig. This is something I am open to, working a grocery or something job 20 hours a week and being done with the corporate world early.

Doesnt mean someone is a jackass. Wow.
Posted by TorchtheFlyingTiger
1st coast
Member since Jan 2008
2683 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 8:05 pm to
quote:

Now sure, one can argue that they should be able to "retire" whenever they want, but the reality is that for every 50 year old that actually manages to retire at 50, there will be a dozen jackasses who are back to being greeters at Walmart in their 70s.


72(t) is how the tax code addresses this already. You can start retirement at any age penalty free. Just have to lock into taking withdrawals for at least 5 year or when you turn 59.5 whichever is longest. And the allowable withdrawal rate is based on life expectancy so you wont blow through it all too quickly. If you return to work out of necessity or choice after that point (59.5 and 5 yrs of withdrawals), the withdrawals can be stopped.

So, if you want to raid 401k to buy a bass boat or RV at 50 you're gonna be penalized. If you are legit early retiring then commit to 72(t) and there is no penalty as it should be.
Posted by RoyalWe
Prairieville, LA
Member since Mar 2018
3785 posts
Posted on 7/6/24 at 6:16 am to
Here's another strategy:

1) Pay the 10% penalty to fund your retirement until you're 54.
2) Get a job at Starbucks or Costco working just enough hours to get into their 401k.
3) Turn 55.
4) Transfer enough money into their 401k from an existing IRA to bridge the gap till you turn 59.5.
5) Retire using the Rule of 55.

*this is not financial advice
Posted by theRealJesseD
Member since Nov 2021
4209 posts
Posted on 7/6/24 at 8:51 am to
It’s actually only a penalty of ~1.5-2.4% since you won’t be paying the payroll taxes that you would have paid had you not contributed the funds to your qualified plan. (6.2%SS/ 1.45% Medicare / .9% extra Medicare over 200k income)
Posted by nola tiger lsu
Member since Nov 2007
6279 posts
Posted on 7/6/24 at 11:16 am to
quote:

It’s actually only a penalty of ~1.5-2.4% since you won’t be paying the payroll taxes that you would have paid had you not contributed the funds to your qualified plan. (6.2%SS/ 1.45% Medicare / .9% extra Medicare over 200k income)


This makes sense but never thought of it, but would the number be negated further (even a lower penalty) bc you put the money in an investment that grew too? Like does the math actually become more of a break even or net positive?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram