- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
RoyalWe
| Favorite team: | LSU  |
| Location: | Louisiana |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | LSU Basketball / Football |
| Occupation: | Retired Engineer |
| Number of Posts: | 5073 |
| Registered on: | 3/15/2018 |
| Online Status: | Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: This entire UFC card has been incredible
Posted by RoyalWe on 6/15/26 at 12:12 am to Godzilla jr
The best I’ve seen.
0
re: End Game in UK
Posted by RoyalWe on 6/14/26 at 12:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Or that I just like supporting charity and pointing out something that would be particularly entertaining for most people on Tigerdroppings. I'm not advocating forced participation. Why do you hate charity?
It's also telling you have to devolve to desiring physical violence because you can't compete rhetorically.
re: End Game in UK
Posted by RoyalWe on 6/14/26 at 10:23 am to Jorts R Us
There is a real opportunity for a charity event where SFP gets in the ring against anyone. I would donate good money to whatever cause he supports. Win-win, FTW.
re: End Game in UK
Posted by RoyalWe on 6/14/26 at 7:59 am to SlowFlowPro
Yes, I’m sure.
Nobody said the WEF has a joystick. That’s your cartoon because it’s the only argument you can beat.
“Closer ties to the EU” doesn’t mean “no trade with Europe.” It means exactly what people are saying it means: slowly watering Brexit down with reset deals, regulatory alignment, migration arrangements, courts, and bureaucracy.
And “the governing class changed” is cute. The faces change. The machine keeps moving the same direction.
You’re not exposing a fallacy. You’re still dodging the point. But hey, that's your trademark intellectual dishonesty: restate the argument into something dumber, attack that version, and then strut around afterward. I've got better things to do than argue with a broken record.
Nobody said the WEF has a joystick. That’s your cartoon because it’s the only argument you can beat.
“Closer ties to the EU” doesn’t mean “no trade with Europe.” It means exactly what people are saying it means: slowly watering Brexit down with reset deals, regulatory alignment, migration arrangements, courts, and bureaucracy.
And “the governing class changed” is cute. The faces change. The machine keeps moving the same direction.
You’re not exposing a fallacy. You’re still dodging the point. But hey, that's your trademark intellectual dishonesty: restate the argument into something dumber, attack that version, and then strut around afterward. I've got better things to do than argue with a broken record.
re: End Game in UK
Posted by RoyalWe on 6/14/26 at 7:49 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:You’re not saving the thread from bad arguments. You’re hijacking it into the only argument you want to have.
I'm just pointing out how bad the arguments are. That's not "taking it off course".
The topic is whether mass immigration, welfare dependency, poor assimilation, and political dilution benefit the host society.
Your answer so far is basically “boogeyman” and “trade exists.” Riveting stuff.
re: End Game in UK
Posted by RoyalWe on 6/14/26 at 7:47 am to SlowFlowPro
This is impressive only if the goal is to miss the point as loudly as possible.
No one argued Britain should stop trading with Europe. No one argued the WEF has a magic joystick. The argument is that the governing class can dislike Brexit, accept it formally, and then spend years trying to dilute it through bureaucracy, courts, migration policy, regulatory alignment, and “reset” politics.
You keep calling that a conspiracy because answering it directly would require more than saying “boogeyman” and polishing your own halo.
No one argued Britain should stop trading with Europe. No one argued the WEF has a magic joystick. The argument is that the governing class can dislike Brexit, accept it formally, and then spend years trying to dilute it through bureaucracy, courts, migration policy, regulatory alignment, and “reset” politics.
You keep calling that a conspiracy because answering it directly would require more than saying “boogeyman” and polishing your own halo.
re: End Game in UK
Posted by RoyalWe on 6/14/26 at 7:39 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:You're dodging the distinction.
What a false choice.
Brexit proves the voters were still capable of overruling the governing class. It does not prove the governing class accepted that decision or stopped preferring closer EU alignment.
The UK leaving the EU is not a rebuttal to the point. It is the reason many of these people are still angry. Since then, the argument has shifted from open membership to "reset," regulatory alignment, migration policy, human-rights constraints, and closer institutional ties.
So no, "the UK left the EU" does not answer the criticism. It just proves that the public won one round.
re: End Game in UK
Posted by RoyalWe on 6/14/26 at 7:32 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Either you think the leadership made that determination or that they should have cheater harder to overcome the will of the people. Which is it?
If the WEF/NWO was that strong, the UK never leaves the EU
re: End Game in UK
Posted by RoyalWe on 6/14/26 at 7:18 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Because the leaders still are aligned with WEF EU goals. Hence, why he said they were furious. Hence, why they continue to not represent their constituents. Hence, why the UK continues to slide further and further down the greased pole of third-world invasion. I guess you like greased poles.
What does the EU have to do with anything related to the UK, then?
And everyone was surprised. /s
quote:Topless trannies and sodomization is not the same as a UFC fight. I'm sorry, it's just not. This is not a 'whataboutism' situation.
I’m summary, both sides suck.
quote:Make Closets Great Again! You and me -- pals!
Awww cute I bet they wish they could share cabinets. Instead for now they’re stuck sharing the closet
quote:I'm not sure what role they'll have to play in JD or Rubio's cabinet, but I like the way you think! Unity! Glad we agree, pal!
No it’s gonna be Gavin and aoc
quote:Hell, yeah, buddy ole pal. JD and Rubio will bring us further into prosperity! I'm glad we agree!
I agree brother
Once the adults are back in charge in 2028 things will be better
:cheers:
re: First it was birds. Now they tell us the Universe isn't real
Posted by RoyalWe on 6/12/26 at 1:58 pm to northshorebamaman
I think “the universe is strange” undersells the point.
Fine-tuning isn’t just vague cosmic weirdness. It’s the claim that specific features of the universe’s basic physics appear necessary for atoms, stars, carbon chemistry, planets, and life to exist at all.
That doesn’t prove a specific religion by itself, but it’s more than just philosophical curiosity. It has real implications, and it is at least compatible with an Abrahamic view of creation.
Fine-tuning isn’t just vague cosmic weirdness. It’s the claim that specific features of the universe’s basic physics appear necessary for atoms, stars, carbon chemistry, planets, and life to exist at all.
That doesn’t prove a specific religion by itself, but it’s more than just philosophical curiosity. It has real implications, and it is at least compatible with an Abrahamic view of creation.
quote:I guess it would depend on the new information?
So why not tactical strikes like last June if that was the case? Oh, bc it doesn't do the bidding of the deep state and Israel
I love it when you guys like to sit back and throw darts while ignoring the reality that shite happens and things change. It's hilarious.
re: First it was birds. Now they tell us the Universe isn't real
Posted by RoyalWe on 6/11/26 at 4:17 pm to PurpleSingularity
I don't disagree with that distinction. However, I don't see anyone making that claim. Maybe I missed it.
quote:I think we got some additional information which required further action on our part. Did that answer your question? Glad to be helpful.
Why did we need a deal? Thought we set their nuke program back to the stone-age with the stealth attacks a year ago
quote:You seem concerned.
People need to realize this is intentional stock market manipulation
re: First it was birds. Now they tell us the Universe isn't real
Posted by RoyalWe on 6/11/26 at 7:47 am to Joseph2001Dirte
quote:You're more addressing "everything is perfectly designed", not fine-tuning. Suffering and death raise serious theological questions, but don't erase why the universe has life-permitting laws/constants in the first place.
Every living thing was intelligently designed to suffer and die?
re: First it was birds. Now they tell us the Universe isn't real
Posted by RoyalWe on 6/11/26 at 7:33 am to PurpleSingularity
quote:It’s fine to disagree, but this isn’t a flat-Earth-level discussion. Questions around cosmological fine-tuning, origin of life, and biological information have been debated by serious scientists and philosophers. One can reject intelligent design, but pretending only idiots find the argument interesting is not a serious response.
You are an idiot, congratulations.
Popular
17
