- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The SEC thinks they can deny the relief granted by a judge.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 11:15 am to Coastal Tiger
Posted on 8/26/26 at 11:15 am to Coastal Tiger
Moscanna is saying the vote was actually 8-8.
You can hate the guy but no way he just makes that up
You can hate the guy but no way he just makes that up
2
Posted on 8/26/26 at 11:16 am to Jabontik
On August 2, 2026, U.S. District Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney in Denver clarified that the injunction did not override existing NCAA roster limits, transfer rules, or revenue-sharing caps, meaning players could only return if schools had available roster spots, eligibility and scholarship/revenue space.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 11:18 am to JoeENorthlando
quote:
On August 2, 2026, U.S. District Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney in Denver clarified that the injunction did not override existing NCAA roster limits, transfer rules, or revenue-sharing caps, meaning players could only return if schools had available roster spots, eligibility and scholarship/revenue space.
ahh cool now do the LA TRO
Posted on 8/26/26 at 11:19 am to GeauxLaneTrain
Well somebody needs to get accurate reporting. I’ve heard unanimous, now it’s 8-8. 
Posted on 8/26/26 at 11:22 am to GeauxLaneTrain
quote:
You can hate the guy but no way he just makes that up
1) I 100% believe he is capable of making up unverifiable data points
2) At best he is referring to what schools would have been inclined to vote, not what they actually did.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 11:23 am to Coastal Tiger
quote:Do you have anything to suggest they did not want to?
LSU had to,vote for the new rule
quote:So, you agree with:
This is the kind of vote you never cast alone. You’re not “proving” anything by casting a lone “nay” vote. This isn’t a schoolyard disagreement where “showing up” someone proves anything.
quote:
1. LSU about to be independent like Notre Dame
Posted on 8/26/26 at 11:24 am to JoeENorthlando
quote:OMG, that is a DIFFERENT case.
On August 2, 2026, U.S. District Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney in Denver clarified that the injunction did not override existing NCAA roster limits, transfer rules, or revenue-sharing caps, meaning players could only return if schools had available roster spots, eligibility and scholarship/revenue space.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 12:00 pm to Honkus
quote:
The SEC, and big 10 for that matter, are about to get destroyed.
What they’re going to do is break away from the NCAA and set up their own governance, which is what many have foreseen
Posted on 8/26/26 at 12:31 pm to Honkus
Showing the reasoning behind the absurdity of the La. TRO. A federal judge pointing out why it will not fly.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 1:07 pm to LSURep864
So the mafia isn’t threatening you directly if they just threaten to kill your family if you testify. Got it.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 1:13 pm to Fat Bastard
quote:
Fat Bastard
quote:
a big pussy
Checks out
Posted on 8/26/26 at 1:16 pm to GeauxLSUBengalTigers
quote:
Tell me you haven't done your research and have no idea what this is all about.
Always here spewing defiance against everything. An absolute cuck!
Riiiiiiiiiiiiight
Posted on 8/26/26 at 1:17 pm to XbengalTiger
quote:
The TRO specifically says the NCAA or any of its subordinates or affiliates are subject to the TRO. The SEC is an affiliate conference in the NCAA.
It says no such thing.
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News