- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The SEC thinks they can deny the relief granted by a judge.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 7:08 am to Ex-Popcorn
Posted on 8/28/26 at 7:08 am to Ex-Popcorn
quote:
Sorry, but you just misunderstand due process and the rights of necessary parties. You cannot bind a third party to anything without affording that third party the opportunity to show up in court and make its case. Everything you are saying is just fun wishcasting that has no impact on the SEC.
And just like I said, the SEC, B1G and specifically Greg Sankey have been added to all the 5 for 5 filings. They are now named defendants.
0
Posted on 8/28/26 at 7:11 am to XbengalTiger
quote:
lsu777
quote:
they will have to file a completely new lawsuit specifically against the SEC. go back to law school, you are clueless
.Did they amend the suit and add the SEC or is it a COMPLETELY NEW LAWSUIT. Maybe you should STFU about things above your pay grade.
:popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: This post was edited on 8/28/26 at 8:10 am
Posted on 8/28/26 at 8:50 am to XbengalTiger
My money is on the judge and kiffin
Posted on 8/28/26 at 9:06 am to XbengalTiger
quote:
Did they amend the suit and add the SEC or is it a COMPLETELY NEW LAWSUIT. Maybe you should STFU about things above your pay grade.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 9:27 am to XbengalTiger
They won't
Here's how it works according to the legal world.
If you are not on an active 53-man roster, practice squad, or any official NFL roster designation, you are not considered an NFL player.
Active NFL Rosters and Practice Squads
To be officially recognized as an NFL player, you typically need to be part of one of the following roster categories:
Active 53-man roster: Players count towards the official team roster and are eligible to participate in games
.
Practice squad: Players develop with the team, attend practices, and learn the playbook but cannot play in games unless temporarily elevated to the active roster for that week
. Practice squad players may still receive compensation and benefits, and their contracts are governed by the league’s collective bargaining agreement
.Our 2 guys do not fit this criteria. All they are doing is TRYING to make a roster or a practice squad. That means they are the same as I am - Not an NFL player. Same goes with Pyburn. He will find out in 3 or 4 days. If he makes either one. All he is guilty of is trying. The SEC is trying to make trying out the same as a full fledged NFL player that suits up every Sunday.. It is not the same. All it means is he is a college player with 1 year eligibility left.
The judge and Kiffin are about to embarrass Sankey and the clowns in the C-suites.. These boneheads need to get their act together. Sankey doesn't want the truth, he just has it in for Kiffin and LSU. He will end up the fool as well as SEC Network and ESPN.. They all hate Kiffin and are blinded by the facts.
Here's how it works according to the legal world.
If you are not on an active 53-man roster, practice squad, or any official NFL roster designation, you are not considered an NFL player.
Active NFL Rosters and Practice Squads
To be officially recognized as an NFL player, you typically need to be part of one of the following roster categories:
Active 53-man roster: Players count towards the official team roster and are eligible to participate in games
.
Practice squad: Players develop with the team, attend practices, and learn the playbook but cannot play in games unless temporarily elevated to the active roster for that week
. Practice squad players may still receive compensation and benefits, and their contracts are governed by the league’s collective bargaining agreement
.Our 2 guys do not fit this criteria. All they are doing is TRYING to make a roster or a practice squad. That means they are the same as I am - Not an NFL player. Same goes with Pyburn. He will find out in 3 or 4 days. If he makes either one. All he is guilty of is trying. The SEC is trying to make trying out the same as a full fledged NFL player that suits up every Sunday.. It is not the same. All it means is he is a college player with 1 year eligibility left.
The judge and Kiffin are about to embarrass Sankey and the clowns in the C-suites.. These boneheads need to get their act together. Sankey doesn't want the truth, he just has it in for Kiffin and LSU. He will end up the fool as well as SEC Network and ESPN.. They all hate Kiffin and are blinded by the facts.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 10:31 am to XbengalTiger
quote:
.Did they amend the suit and add the SEC or is it a COMPLETELY NEW LAWSUIT. Maybe you should STFU about things above your pay grade.
According to Moscona, the plaintiffs have amended their original petition for injunctive relief to specifically name the SEC and Sankey as defendants alongside the NCAA, which is likely why the hearing on the preliminary injunction was bumped from Monday of next week to Thursday.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 10:38 am to misey94
Okay and the ultimate nuke, the CFP Committee, a private LLC, can blackball teams that play NFL players - and no TRO will stop that.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 10:40 am to Honkus
quote:
The lawyers will say by threatening schools that play these guys, its the same as directly threatening the players.... which is what the TRO is explicitly about.. protecting the players and provided relief to their harm
LSU, and any other school, would seem to have protection.
I’m not an attorney, but it seems you can’t make specific policies/demands towards an employee/member of your company, lose in court regarding those policies, and then fire or punish employee/member.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 10:47 am to LSURep864
quote:
I think the SEC is saying to LSU, we can’t stop you from letting them play. But we can stop your participation in our conference if you do so.
Which is probably the only way we actually get governance at this point. So take what you can get.
What Sankey needs to do is let his balls drop and issue a blanket statement: any school who plays an athlete ruled ineligible by the NCAA (which, though ineffective, IS still technically the governing body of intercollegiate sports) will be penalized according to the rules established.
That goes for EVERYONE.
And yes, I’m looking at YOU, Ole Miss/Trinidad Chambliss.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 10:49 am to JoeENorthlando
quote:
Okay and the ultimate nuke, the CFP Committee, a private LLC, can blackball teams that play NFL players - and no TRO will stop that.
You keep a 13-0 team out of the College Football Playoff by blackballing them, you’d best be prepared to defend a very nasty collusion lawsuit.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 11:01 am to lsupride87
It is a good rule but shouldn't go into affect for one year so that the 4 for 4 class of 2022 is not shafted. That is where the SEC/NCAA will get into trouble, making after the fact rulings that change it to 5 for 5, which limits the players from 2022 class from earning their maximum living.
All the SEC has to do is delay implementation of that rule for one year until Sept 1, 2027. The everyone is happy.
All the SEC has to do is delay implementation of that rule for one year until Sept 1, 2027. The everyone is happy.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 11:04 am to QB
quote:
All the SEC has to do is delay implementation of that rule for one year until Sept 1, 2027. The everyone is happy.
Except Ole Miss.
Even if they get everything they want, their butthurt will always be palpable.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 11:17 am to XbengalTiger
Okay, then let that judge run college sports. Let him be responsible for the upcoming labor disputes that will arise from this free for all. Also he can handle the "contracts" aspect of NIL. Maybe he could establish rules and penalties arising fro the breaking of the rules that he establishes.
We have a situation now where the courts are running college football.
We have a situation now where the courts are running college football.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 11:29 am to LSURep864
quote:
I think the SEC is saying to LSU, we can’t stop you from letting them play. But we can stop your participation in our conference if you do so.
And LSU pays them to play, so if they can't play, they lose opportunities. This, this action is injurious to the plaintiffs. It's basically colluding to circumvent direct action against the plaintiffs.
Page 7 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News