Started By
Message

re: So basically, from now on, every kid who can't crack the starting lineup will transfer.

Posted on 12/11/24 at 8:39 pm to
Posted by jonboy
Member since Sep 2003
7253 posts
Posted on 12/11/24 at 8:39 pm to
Paying back the value of the scholarship plus whatever other benefits they get would be one way to stop it but it wouldn't address the fact that some players are encouraged to transfer because of ability or academics.
Posted by Dizz
Member since May 2008
15535 posts
Posted on 12/11/24 at 8:39 pm to
quote:

What’s corrupt? This would be like an NFL with no salary caps (enabling big market teams to dominate with unlimited money), no contracts, (basically constant free agency for every player). It’s pure insanity. What’s to prevent a billionaire from funneling millions to players at their favorite school.


I believe that is called the free market not corruption.
Posted by misey94
Hernando, MS
Member since Jan 2007
27554 posts
Posted on 12/11/24 at 8:40 pm to
You have to pay a key few guys you know are the future to stay. They have to get some snaps too, but it’s better to pay the ones you know have it well enough to stay put than to replace them.
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
57353 posts
Posted on 12/11/24 at 8:42 pm to
quote:

Look at the parody in the SEC this year.


Posted by Honestabe1809
Tampa
Member since Oct 2014
328 posts
Posted on 12/11/24 at 8:49 pm to
quote:

Only if they place a similar rule for coaches too


Hell No. A coach and a player are not equivalent. That’s an absurd analogy.

After freshman year, players should be able to transfer (two week window.) After that, they have to sit out a year.

If a coach is terminated, only players that letter should have a two week window.

If a coach just leaves, no transfer option.

Grad transfers remain unchanged.
Posted by mhc4tigers
Member since Aug 2016
4478 posts
Posted on 12/11/24 at 9:26 pm to
Only about 30% of the portal kids get picked up No idea what happens to the others.

For a lot of,kids they know they only have so long to get film for a hoped for NFL gig.

I wish they would develop and wait. But I don’t blame them for moving around.
Posted by G Khan
the basin
Member since Mar 2007
493 posts
Posted on 12/12/24 at 12:08 am to
quote:

It’s pretty non sustainable. Basically, every player, on every team is an unrestricted free agent. Every year.

I would not own any Saints gear if that was the way NFL rosters were constructed. Player development, loyalty, team pride, and long term relationship building have all been replaced by the mighty dollar in college football.

It would be hard to support an NFL team if I could never be sure that my favorite players were there on a long term commitment. These college athletes are all on perpetual one year deals.

I love them getting their money, it’s long overdo, but the rules of unlimited transferring have to be revisited.


Spot on. I quit watching the NFL back in the day...post Marino and the Marks brothers. Loved that team. Then, the players moved around too much...teams were very different every year...They lost me. I knew college football would change drastically if the opened Pandora's box with this BS. My interest has waned...I hope the pendulum swings back the other way and the wild west is reigned in. Otherwise, a thing I grew up loving and still do...may wither on the vine for me.
Posted by chadr07
Pineville, Louisiana
Member since Jan 2015
10364 posts
Posted on 12/12/24 at 2:36 am to
Yea think about Marshall right now. They won their conference title only to be rewarded with basically the entire team going into the portal because the HC took another job.


Way to win a conference title then destroy an entire football program within days guys.
Posted by HattiesburgTiger5439
Hattiesburg ms
Member since Sep 2023
664 posts
Posted on 12/12/24 at 5:10 am to
Then your a weekend warrior my friend! Your not a true tiger!
Trust me I hate this crap and wish we could go back in time and fix this shite show before Pandoras box was open!
But with that said I love LSU football! There's no going back so #GEAUXTIGERS
Posted by burke985
UGANDA
Member since Aug 2011
26880 posts
Posted on 12/12/24 at 5:33 am to
If you are being paid to play and signing a 1 year NIL contract then I don't see the issue. It sucks but will be the norm going forward unless some major rule changes with portal happen.
Posted by Loup
Ferriday
Member since Apr 2019
14158 posts
Posted on 12/12/24 at 6:09 am to
man y'all take this way too seriously.


So what if they do? It's happening to every team out there. If they can transfer to a team where they get to be a starter earlier then good for them.
Posted by TigerScorpion
Mississippi
Member since Aug 2018
1161 posts
Posted on 12/12/24 at 6:10 am to
Yeah, and the first time a coach yells at one of these little snow flakes, the agent’s calls will start. That’s another reason Saban left. He wasn’t about to coddle them.
Posted by Gulf Coast Tiger
Ms Gulf Coast
Member since Jan 2004
19225 posts
Posted on 12/12/24 at 9:31 am to
Every fan base feels this way
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
32033 posts
Posted on 12/12/24 at 10:04 am to
quote:

I think it would have to be nil deals written explicitly for what it actually is pay for play


The NIL payors don't want this. They don't want to "employ" college football players to play football. That brings with it a whole set of employment laws/issues they don't want to deal with. The players would need to be employed by the schools...not a hodgepodge group of wealthy business owners, tech CEOs, lawyers, real-estate developers, etc. Pat Mahomes isn't employed by State Farm to play football, and they don't want to. He's employed by the KC Chiefs to do that.

quote:

ou don’t play you get no pay, miss a practice you get no pay, you get in a fight at practice with a coach you get no pay, you stay for a second year and playing the first game you will get a yearly bonus the following Sunday after staying for a second consecutive year.


Sounds great...but the free market would likely render such teams moot. For example, let's say I'm the No. 1 rated HS QB. LSU, Texas, Michigan, Ohio St, Georgia, etc ALL want me to come play for them. They all indicated willing to give me a $5M NIL deal. However, LSU, Ohio St., Georgia want to make that deal incumbent upon the terms/restrictions you laid. Michigan and Texas don't. Where do you think I'm going to sign? Not with one of the schools putting restrictions on me. Which means fans on the Tiger Rant will start SCREAMING about LSU's HC and NIL payors not being able to sign top players...which will, in turn, lead them to abandon those demands of restrictions.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
34767 posts
Posted on 12/12/24 at 10:15 am to
this....

also another ruling buy the courts made it to where there can be no restriction on NIL deals


there has to be some over arching settlement that fixes this. hopefully that is the one planned for next year



the bigger problem is the transfer over and over instead of NIL. NIL is out of hand but we knew it would be, the damn transfer rules are insane

but you can not blame the players...if you are doing a job and another company comes and gives you a 50% pay raise each year, you are going to switch every time too.
Posted by des4271
Member since Oct 2014
4328 posts
Posted on 12/12/24 at 10:26 am to
That’s the part that would stop if they took the portal away. But that is totally possible. Michigan/booster would only owe him 3 million though, because it was 12 million for 4 years. You’re not going to stop or take away NIL now, the only way to slow this nonsense down is by giving at minimum 1 transfer only and you have to sit out a year after that or give no free transfers.
Posted by atltiger6487
Member since May 2011
19128 posts
Posted on 12/12/24 at 10:33 am to
quote:

So stop watching it. If it causes you this much angst, just give it up.
I still watch, but my emotional attachment to LSU (and college football in general) is WAY down from just a few years ago. And I've been a college football lover for over 50 years.

Of course we can stop watching, but we'd instead prefer the game we've loved to be fixed.
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
32033 posts
Posted on 12/12/24 at 10:33 am to
quote:

the only way to slow this nonsense down is by giving at minimum 1 transfer only and you have to sit out a year after that or give no free transfers.


Again, this issue was already litigated. The NCAA lost (temporarily), but saw the writing on the wall that they would lose the argument permanently. In response, the NCAA changed its rule requiring mult-time transfers to sit a year after the 1st transfer.
Posted by des4271
Member since Oct 2014
4328 posts
Posted on 12/12/24 at 10:43 am to
Well, I don’t keep up with all of it that much and didn’t know that. If they can’t enforce those rules, it’s going to eventually crash and burn then. NIL will cause ticket prices to skyrocket over time and less people will attend and people will get tired of all the transfer madness and just quit watching. Then there would possibly be changes once the profits for the big dogs gets drastically reduced.
Posted by Portcityblues
Member since Jan 2017
821 posts
Posted on 12/12/24 at 10:46 am to
due to this we just need to trim the fat. Go with a 50 man roster. that way you aren't throwing money away at someone who is gonna jump ship and the less people you have the more you can pay them. Plus you always have room to add someone if needed.

2 deep at each starting position
1 punter
1 kicker
1 long snapper

then you still have 3 spots to fill with positions of your choice
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram