1
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: No Way We Should Play Em
Posted on 8/29/26 at 7:18 pm to JudgeHolden
Posted on 8/29/26 at 7:18 pm to JudgeHolden
You sir are not a judge
Posted on 8/29/26 at 7:30 pm to JudgeHolden
No it’s not !
Posted on 8/29/26 at 7:30 pm to JudgeHolden
Man da fck up
Posted on 8/29/26 at 7:35 pm to JudgeHolden
Sure the. This would apply to Trinidad Chambliss also !
Posted on 8/29/26 at 7:43 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
What is your analysis whether a third party is protected from the consequences of violating a rule while the enforcing organization is under restraint, particularly discussing consequences if the restraint is dissolved or overturned as wrongfully or improvidently decreed?
So you think the SEC is saying they will accept the courts decision, while still planing on holding up their “consequences” on the off chance it gets overturned AND the court rules their post decision penalties are even legal?
Posted on 8/29/26 at 7:45 pm to More beer please
quote:
So you think the SEC is saying they will accept the courts decision, while still planing on holding up their “consequences” on the off chance it gets overturned AND the court rules their post decision penalties are even legal?
That’s new. I’d have to see exactly what they said.
A TRO expires after a few days. Is the SEC entering into a consent injunction?
Posted on 8/29/26 at 7:46 pm to Veritas
quote:
You sir are not a judge
Correct. I’m not a Holden either.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 8:29 pm to bchauvin 1970
Bech mon chu.
Posted on 8/30/26 at 9:51 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
"The order entered against the SEC and Commissioner Sankey is a temporary restraining order, not a final ruling on the merits," the conference said in a statement. "The SEC and Commissioner Sankey are prepared to contest the allegations in the plaintiffs' petition at Thursday morning's hearing and defend the SEC's rights as a voluntary association to fulfill its mission to its member institutions."
SEC Still Intends to Punish
This is EXACTLY what I was worried about.
This post was edited on 8/30/26 at 9:52 pm
Posted on 8/30/26 at 9:53 pm to JudgeHolden
No matter what happens, this has been worth it for the melts alone. 
This post was edited on 8/30/26 at 9:58 pm
Posted on 8/30/26 at 9:56 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
Injunctions get reversed all the time. And when they do in Louisiana, I don’t think they protect your conduct during the time they were in effect.
Probably should take "judge" out of your username and "lawyer" wouldn't be appropriate either. You can NOT be prosecuted or penalized for doing something legal at the time. IF the injunction is reversed, you WOULD be in trouble to then continue that action.
Posted on 8/30/26 at 9:57 pm to UnluckyTiger
True dat.
A TRO does not protect us if we play them.
This could really eff up our system.
I thought earlier today the SEC was going to lay down, consent, and decline to appeal the PI. If that happens, play em.
Doesn’t look like that is happening.
A TRO does not protect us if we play them.
This could really eff up our system.
I thought earlier today the SEC was going to lay down, consent, and decline to appeal the PI. If that happens, play em.
Doesn’t look like that is happening.
Posted on 8/30/26 at 9:58 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
JudgeHolden
quote:
I don’t think
Judges don't say that. You're full of shite
Posted on 8/30/26 at 10:00 pm to NotaStarGazer
quote:
Probably should take "judge" out of your username and "lawyer" wouldn't be appropriate either. You can NOT be prosecuted or penalized for doing something legal at the time. IF the injunction is reversed, you WOULD be in trouble to then continue that action.
You got some law on that? Would love to see it.
The party GETTING the injunction faces the consequences if it is reversed, even if it acted under the injunction. That’s 3608 in Louisiana, and I think it’s in the 680 range in Texas.
A third party would have even less protection.
But if you got some other law, do tell.
This post was edited on 8/30/26 at 10:02 pm
Posted on 8/30/26 at 10:01 pm to Fishhead
quote:
You're full of shite
Often true.
What’s your analysis?
Posted on 8/30/26 at 10:13 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
TRO that is later reversed will still protect you for that period of time it was valid, but thanks for your inaccurate legal opinion.
You got a cite for that? Cuz 3608 suggests otherwise.
Alabama basketball and Bediako. Zero penalties. Zero vacated wins. Zero sanctions. Thanks for playing.
Posted on 8/30/26 at 10:17 pm to stuckintexas
quote:
Alabama basketball and Bediako. Zero penalties. Zero vacated wins. Zero sanctions. Thanks for playing.
That ain’t law, Clarence Darrow. And these matters are pending in Louisiana and Texas, right?
This post was edited on 8/30/26 at 10:19 pm
Posted on 8/30/26 at 10:24 pm to JudgeHolden
From reading this thread, you sound like you are having a one person conversation in this thread you were the only person responding
Posted on 8/30/26 at 10:28 pm to JudgeHolden
Lawyers and Insurance Co. are the downfall of modern society
Posted on 8/30/26 at 10:32 pm to JudgeHolden
The CBS article is piss poor journalism. If you read the actual statements.. they arent saying that.
Page 6 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News