- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: More criticism of Aranda
Posted on 9/13/19 at 10:07 am to The Pirate King
Posted on 9/13/19 at 10:07 am to The Pirate King
quote:
Anyone with any sort of football knowledge saw how badly Aranda was outschemed against Texas.
0
Posted on 9/13/19 at 10:08 am to RB10
Our 2.5Mill defense gave up all those TDs.
Thats not the only game defense was average. Its not a bad defense, but he needs to step it up if he is earning that much money. I'm sorry but its a fact. If he was getting paid 800K, I promise he wouldnt get this scrutiny.
Thats not the only game defense was average. Its not a bad defense, but he needs to step it up if he is earning that much money. I'm sorry but its a fact. If he was getting paid 800K, I promise he wouldnt get this scrutiny.
Posted on 9/13/19 at 10:08 am to ThePaleHorse
quote:
. Our defense is plain and simply not as good as 30-40 other defenses
in 3 years our worst finish on defense was 26, in case you suck at math 26 is less than 30-40
Posted on 9/13/19 at 10:08 am to ThePaleHorse
quote:
Our defense is plain and simply not as good as 30-40 other defenses
Posted on 9/13/19 at 10:09 am to ThePaleHorse
quote:
Our 2.5Mill defense gave up all those TDs. Thats not the only game defense was average.
Its not a bad defense, but he needs to step it up if he is earning that much money. I'm sorry but its a fact. If he was getting paid 800K, I promise he wouldnt get this scrutiny.
Nothing in any of your posts are facts. They’re literally opinions.
In fact, the actual facts being posted show your opinions to be ignorant.
This post was edited on 9/13/19 at 10:11 am
Posted on 9/13/19 at 10:09 am to Srobi14
quote:
on which point?
Paraphrasing:
He said he and Aranda agreed before the game that not blitzing as much was the best way to minimize SE’s scrambling ability.
They wanted to take away SEs run and force him to beat them throwing downfield. They obviously weren’t expecting SE to throw perfect dimes as many times as he did. But they basically did take away Ehlinger’s run threat.
Sometimes you have to look as much at what didn’t happen as what did. They thought SE could escape the blitz and run for 150+, and they were probably right.
This post was edited on 9/13/19 at 10:12 am
Posted on 9/13/19 at 10:10 am to RB10
I dont know why you're so agro, the twist contain shallow spy works for bama. Watch the 17 playoffs against clemson when they shut down that kid forgot his name.
Posted on 9/13/19 at 10:11 am to Srobi14
quote:
I dont know why you're so agro, the twist contain shallow spy works for bama. Watch the 17 playoffs against clemson when they shut down that kid forgot his name.
Yeah it worked against Bryant, who’s a mediocre QB.
When they faced a QB who could make the throws they had 44 points put up on them.
You’re on a roll now.
ETA: Both Watson and Lawrence shredded Alabama. Ehlinger isn’t in that tier, but he’s just below it. People tried to tell this board he was a “better passing version” of Tebow. He’s not some scrub.
This post was edited on 9/13/19 at 10:15 am
Posted on 9/13/19 at 10:12 am to ThePaleHorse
quote:
If he was getting paid 800K, I promise he wouldnt get this scrutiny.
first of all, bull shite
. I guarandamntee you "Mallevto" was not the highest paid DC and i seriously doubt Steele was either that you keep bringing up his salary is stupid. He's paid the market rate and the market values him as a top tier DC. The market > you.
quote:
(Our 2.5Mill defense gave up all those TDs.)
you can pay some a billion dollars, against good offenses and good QBs in today's college FB they are going to score.
This post was edited on 9/13/19 at 10:14 am
Posted on 9/13/19 at 10:13 am to LSUStar
quote:
the players missed a lot of tackles some of which changed how things turned out. Don’t know why they missed the tackles, but they did.
seemed to be when they were tired
quote:
I think some may have been scheme
I lay most of the blame on scheme. I think being aggressive helps in all aspects. Pressures the qb, forces TFL and sacks, turnovers and better tackling.
Posted on 9/13/19 at 10:14 am to Topwater Trout
quote:
I lay most of the blame on scheme.
Why do you hate O?
Posted on 9/13/19 at 10:15 am to RB10
quote:
Yeah it worked against Bryant, who’s a mediocre QB.
When they faced a QB who could make the throws they had 44 points put up on them.
what did Watson score on them the 2 years before that
Posted on 9/13/19 at 10:15 am to sumbodyorsum1
quote:he could be referring to Notre Dame or Florida as well
If you are referring to the A&M game
Posted on 9/13/19 at 10:15 am to Topwater Trout
quote:
lay most of the blame on scheme. I think being aggressive helps in all aspects. Pressures the qb, forces TFL and sacks, turnovers and better tackling.
And allows a QB like Ehlinger to escape blitzes and run for 150+ because there’s nobody behind them once he escapes the blitz.
O basically said it himself, that that is why he and Aranda decided not to blitz the whole game. Pay attention.
This post was edited on 9/13/19 at 10:17 am
Posted on 9/13/19 at 10:16 am to Topwater Trout
quote:
I think being aggressive helps in all aspects. Pressures the qb, forces TFL and sacks, turnovers and better tackling.
Tell Texas that. They brought 6 on 3rd and 17 and gave up a 65 yard catch and run.
I guess it’s a good thing you aren’t making the decisions.
Posted on 9/13/19 at 10:16 am to Topwater Trout
quote:
I think being aggressive helps in all aspects. Pressures the qb, forces TFL and sacks, turnovers and better tackling.
yep, it worked great for Texas on 3rd and 17.
Posted on 9/13/19 at 10:16 am to 00 Tech Grad
quote:
And allows a QB like Ehlinger to escape blitzes and run for 150+.
I think we would have been better off.
Posted on 9/13/19 at 10:17 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I think we would have been better off.
Why do you hate O?
Posted on 9/13/19 at 10:17 am to Skillet
quote:
UCF---32
At least 10 of those points, if I recall correctly, were from turnovers by the offense. A Pick-6 and a fumble that led to a field goal after the UCF offense gained 0 yards deep in LSU territory.
Posted on 9/13/19 at 10:17 am to RB10
Ok, Lawerence wasn't a running threat, that's kind of an irrelevant take. And that was certainly was a case of just exceptional man beaters and great throws in very tight coverage.
Page 10 of 21
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News