- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/11/23 at 11:27 am to mmcgrath
Why is it that you apologists always say that we want a great team. Sure that would be nice but there is so much distance between that and last year's team that it is not even a consideration. What would I and most critics want? How about a competitive team that at least has a chance to win every game but will still lose quite a few. You know, a team that the game isn't over in the first five minutes. Maybe a team that can win six SEC games and have an overall winning season, possibly even go to the NIT. All those things would be quite nice but are still a long way from a "great" team.
Now do you think McMahon can produce this next season? Shut up about great teams and answer me this one oh great just give him more time.
Now do you think McMahon can produce this next season? Shut up about great teams and answer me this one oh great just give him more time.
Posted on 4/12/23 at 11:40 am to Tom Bronco
This year is McMahon’s last chance to show any improvement.
Our roster next year should be better than the one we had if we land Baker and Abram.
I’m on the same page as you, we should be a competitive team that finishes around middle of the pack in the SEC and can compete for a NIT spot.
If we have a similar season they need to pull the plug on McMahon
Our roster next year should be better than the one we had if we land Baker and Abram.
I’m on the same page as you, we should be a competitive team that finishes around middle of the pack in the SEC and can compete for a NIT spot.
If we have a similar season they need to pull the plug on McMahon
Posted on 4/12/23 at 11:46 am to drizztiger
I'm not expecting anything. I hope I'm wrong, but the next few seasons are probably going to be as bad or worse and just a mean to an end. The next coach is going to have a massive rebuild to deal with.
Posted on 4/12/23 at 11:56 am to Tom Bronco
quote:The problem is that you wanted all that and more from day 1. And I bet you still bitch if we get 6 SEC wins no matter what you say now.
Why is it that you apologists always say that we want a great team. Sure that would be nice but there is so much distance between that and last year's team that it is not even a consideration. What would I and most critics want? How about a competitive team that at least has a chance to win every game but will still lose quite a few. You know, a team that the game isn't over in the first five minutes. Maybe a team that can win six SEC games and have an overall winning season, possibly even go to the NIT. All those things would be quite nice but are still a long way from a "great" team
This year we should better our conference record but not do as well OOC due to a tougher schedule.
Posted on 4/12/23 at 12:24 pm to mmcgrath
Coach McMahon, who else are we looking at out of the transfer portal?
Posted on 4/12/23 at 12:27 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
The problem is that you wanted all that and more from day 1.
B-U-L-L-S-H-I-T
The expectations going into the season were the lowest in 6 years. And those expecations were largely in line with the national outlook for the team. That was to finish somewhere in the middle of the SEC and, if everything broke right, MAYBE compete for a NCAA Tournament bid. But no one EXPECTED a NCAA Tournament appearance. Those expectations were based upon a relatively highly rated recruiting/transfer class coupled with a HC who was coming off a 30 win season at his prior school. In a few weeks/months this year's incoming transfer/recruiting class will be finalized and ranked. And it is entirely likely last year's class will have been ranked higher.
If we are being honest, the majority of LSU fans had a lower expectation level than even the national outlook. What we got was a team that fell pathetically short of meeting even those already low expectations. TWO (2) SEC wins...16 losses, most of those uncompetitive....tied for the worst ever in program history. To say the frustration/apathy that arose from last season was simply a byproduct of unrealistic expectations is absurd.
quote:
And I bet you still bitch if we get 6 SEC wins no matter what you say now
If LSU only gets 6 SEC wins next season then yes, a serious discussion about moving on from McMahon should be had. That's because 6 wins would STILL likely put LSU in the bottom 1/3rd of the league (like Georgia was at 6-12 this season). Like it or not. "Fair" or not, it has NEVER been easier to "rebuild" a team. Massive turnarounds can happen literally in the span of one season. If after two years McMahon has proven he's nowhere near making LSU a winning program then one has to ask "why are we wasting time with this?".
The mindset of it takes time to slowly build a program is antiquated, outdated, and just flat out wrong. Why? Because it is very likely McMahon is going to have to turnover his roster again with several new players following next season. That is simply the landscape of college basketball today. Expecting to gradually build with players developing over the course of 3, 4, 5 years is not going happen. The players won't stay long enough to do so. Hell, McMahon signed 4 HS players just last season. Two have already left after one season.
Posted on 4/12/23 at 1:45 pm to Alt26
Yes, I probably wasn't being honest with the six wins. 9 or 10 is what I really want. I guess I was just thinking that after last season six would be an improvement and the SEC is going to have a lot of good teams once again.
Posted on 4/12/23 at 1:51 pm to drizztiger
barring some unforeseen transfers in this roster is no better than last year's maybe even worse. The only way this team gets to even 8 SEC wins is if the SEC is WAY down or the 2 touted freshman recruits for last year step up big time. Otherwise we are looking at 5-7 win SEC team at best.
Posted on 4/12/23 at 1:53 pm to Tom Bronco
quote:
Yes, I probably wasn't being honest with the six wins. 9 or 10 is what I really want. I guess I was just thinking that after last season six would be an improvement and the SEC is going to have a lot of good teams once again.
Even with those hopes, what a difference in hopes and expectations.
Not since Johnson and then JJ have we settled for such.
Posted on 4/12/23 at 2:08 pm to Alt26
quote:In order to compete for an NCAA Tourney bid out of the SEC, you have to be a top 50 team. Anyone taking an objective approach would realize how impossible to do with a zeroed out roster and no recruits in April. Add in the NOA and it is a foolish dream.
The expectations going into the season were the lowest in 6 years. And those expecations were largely in line with the national outlook for the team. That was to finish somewhere in the middle of the SEC and, if everything broke right, MAYBE compete for a NCAA Tournament bid. But no one EXPECTED a NCAA Tournament appearance. Those expectations were based upon a relatively highly rated recruiting/transfer class coupled with a HC who was coming off a 30 win season at his prior school. In a few weeks/months this year's incoming transfer/recruiting class will be finalized and ranked. And it is entirely likely last year's class will have been ranked higher
I find it insulting to think that a team could start at ground zero and suddenly be a .500 team in the SEC. You guys must think that half the SEC isn't even trying to believe that.
quote:I know you keep saying this. But you ignore how zeroed this program was plus the NOA. There was no way LSU could pull off a "massive turnaround" overnight with all of that.
Massive turnarounds can happen literally in the span of one season.
I know you hate McMahon, but he has shown the ability to recruit the portal and hs, even with the NOA hanging over his head. When that has passed, we will see where that recruiting goes in 2024.
Posted on 4/12/23 at 2:09 pm to Gus007
It would take $11.8 million to can CMM after the 2023-24 season.
IMO, MM will get at least 3 years and probably 4 regardless of record. And, yes, that would suck.
IMO, MM will get at least 3 years and probably 4 regardless of record. And, yes, that would suck.
Posted on 4/12/23 at 2:10 pm to Tom Bronco
quote:So be up front about it. You want a tourney bid and a top 50 team NEXT YEAR. Because apparently everyone does it.
Yes, I probably wasn't being honest with the six wins. 9 or 10 is what I really want. I guess I was just thinking that after last season six would be an improvement and the SEC is going to have a lot of good teams once again.
Posted on 4/12/23 at 2:54 pm to Cshaw91
quote:
"Talking points” aka facts. McMild stinks on the recruiting trail. Why is this so hard for you McMen to comprehend? Dude is low energy and will never be able to compete in this league
Do you really not comprehend how cringe-inducing this post is?
Posted on 4/12/23 at 3:00 pm to GeorgeWest
quote:
It would take $11.8 million to can CMM after the 2023-24 season.
IMO, MM will get at least 3 years and probably 4 regardless of record. And, yes, that would suck.
He will get at least 3 years unless this season is somehow as bad or worse than this past season which seems like it would be difficult to do honestly.
Make no mistake about it, even Woodward wouldnt put up with his shiny new hire sinking the program in 2 consecutive seasons. I see us improving and getting somewhere between 4 (hoping this is the FLOOR) and 8 SEC wins probably depending on how these last few transfers shake out. Looks like he is going a bit Kelly in the portal trying to get home grown kids back here maybe to help establish a better culture than the one we had last year.
Kendal Coleman was the only (Scholarship) LA native on the roster this past season who was an absolute disaster from what he was doing at NWST by comparison.
This post was edited on 4/12/23 at 3:03 pm
Posted on 4/12/23 at 4:14 pm to thunderbird1100
So MM get Jalen Cook and Jordan Wright to come here even though most of the MM haters, and that's what you are, said no one would come to this s**t show. PG is THE most important player and we did not have an SEC caliber PG last year. He signed who he could sign so let's just put that one to rest. This team should be better just because of that. Wright is a scorer not just a shooter and is a physical defender. If Ward and Reid continue to improve and Fountain can give them more consistent play then he may bring in a few more pieces to complete the team. I do also expect some improvement this year. More importantly I expect improvement throughout the year. I'm not putting a number on it but with an SEC PG and a more consistent 2 guard I think we win 5-6 more games last year.
Posted on 4/12/23 at 5:06 pm to Tom Bronco
Their argument speaks for itself. “We’re gonna be so much better and so good we’ll finish 12th in the SEC instead of 14th.” It’s laughable how they’ve twisted themselves trying to convince people that being terrible is actually good.
Posted on 4/13/23 at 1:17 pm to Madking
Projected starters? Assume Wright and Cook are 2.
Posted on 4/13/23 at 1:22 pm to GeismarGeauxer
If the season started tomorrow...
Cook/Ward/Wright/Fountain/Reed
Thank God it does not start tomorrow
Cook/Ward/Wright/Fountain/Reed
Thank God it does not start tomorrow
Posted on 4/19/23 at 7:32 am to Pnels08
Nah it’d be cook, Stewart, Wright, fountain and baker
If nothing at least he’s got a couple kids who can make an open jumper now
If nothing at least he’s got a couple kids who can make an open jumper now
This post was edited on 4/19/23 at 7:33 am
Popular
Back to top
