- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSP release Lacy info in reference to Lacy attorney misinformation
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:04 pm to sharkfhin
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:04 pm to sharkfhin
quote:
so while swerving to avoid gold truck she didnt see the oncoming suv she hit?
She braked and swerved 0.5 seconds before impact. It’s impossible to say whether she saw the oncoming SUV but even if it was in her field of vision, I doubt her brain actually registered it.
quote:
What was her motive then?
What do you mean by “motive”? I think it’s pretty clear that her motive was to avoid running into the gold truck in front of her.
quote:
If I understand correctly if a gold truck was in front of her how could she even see KL oncoming in her lane?
She most likely couldn’t.
2
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:04 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
So what happens now? Does Mr. Hall's family not get any justice either from KL's insurance or Funion girl?
I’m gonna go out on a limb and guess his family gets a large payout from both of those insurance companies (Funyun and Lacy)
That will obviously have to play out and will take a while. I’m sure both insurance companies will try and put the blame on the other party, exactly what is going on in this thread… The question of “who is most at fault here and what % fault, Funyun lady or Lacy”
I think it’s clear those 2 drivers caused this. What’s not clear is what % fault should be assigned to both. The one who started it with bad driving or the one who ended it with bad driving.
This post was edited on 10/7/25 at 1:12 pm
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:06 pm to JPLSU1981
Guess it would depend on their limits. Hopefully it'll probably a bit of solace for them.
shite situation all around despite who was at fault.
shite situation all around despite who was at fault.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:07 pm to Geauxgurt
Lmao the usual suspects out here defending people doing illegal shite.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:10 pm to khill715
quote:
2 things can be true. Lacy was driving recklessly and he was not directly responsible for the crash.
Except he was responsible. Just because he avoided wrecking himself does not mean his actions didn't cause the wreck.
This is like saying someone who runs a red-light causing two other cars to collide isn't at fault because they avoided a collision themselves.
Lacy's ILLEGAL driving was without question a major factor in those two vehicles colliding.
This post was edited on 10/7/25 at 1:12 pm
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:16 pm to poncho villa
quote:
I disagree, his actions caused the chain of events
I can’t say that I fully disagree with you. Put one of your loved ones in either of the impacted cars and things would feel much different.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:16 pm to lostinbr
Motive meaning her decision. What kinda dumb fricking decision was that, you avoid hitting someone from behind to then go into oncoming traffic? Thats nuts.
I would have taken my chances with the shoulder and ditch.
So basically gold truck slows hard brakes because of Lacy coming, car behind gold truck switches lanes and collides with suv.
Lacy in left lane
Gold truck hard brakes
Car behind gold truck swerved and collides with suv
Lacy triggered it
Car doesnt even see Lacy swerves because gold truck hard braked
Car collides with suv in oncoming lane.
1.Lacy triggered it in the act of breaking the law(negligent)
2.Gold truck(innocent)
3.Car serves to avoid gold truck cause she was following too close( negligent)
End of story. Rip too both involved.
I would have taken my chances with the shoulder and ditch.
So basically gold truck slows hard brakes because of Lacy coming, car behind gold truck switches lanes and collides with suv.
Lacy in left lane
Gold truck hard brakes
Car behind gold truck swerved and collides with suv
Lacy triggered it
Car doesnt even see Lacy swerves because gold truck hard braked
Car collides with suv in oncoming lane.
1.Lacy triggered it in the act of breaking the law(negligent)
2.Gold truck(innocent)
3.Car serves to avoid gold truck cause she was following too close( negligent)
End of story. Rip too both involved.
This post was edited on 10/7/25 at 1:19 pm
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:16 pm to Metaloctopus
quote:
So, instead of drive-by downvotes, explain yourselves.
Nah, more downvotes for your big dummy post.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:16 pm to RB10
quote:
He caused an accident. He was absolutely deserving of criminal charges.
The gold truck was able to avoid hitting Lacy. He didn’t need to slow down at all, but I understand in the moment he wasn’t sure Lacy was vacating the lane so he reduced his speed out of caution. That should have been the end of it. He cautiously reduced speed without rapidly decelerating by slamming on his brakes, so the driver behind him should not have had any trouble doing the same. Her negligence was the proximate and primary cause of the accident. If you want to argue that she also deserved to be charged with a crime and is deserving of the same vitriol being directed at Lacy, then that’s another discussion.
This post was edited on 10/7/25 at 1:18 pm
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:18 pm to lostinbr
MFers are folding themselves into pretzels trying to shift blame around. Its sad
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:22 pm to MikeTheTiger71
quote:
The gold truck was able to avoid hitting Lacy. He didn’t need to slow down at all, but I understand in the moment he wasn’t sure Lacy was vacating the lane so he reduced his speed out of caution. That should have been the end of it. He cautiously reduced speed without rapidly decelerating by slamming on his brakes, so the driver behind him should not have had any trouble doing the same.
All that matters, pertaining to Lacy, is that the truck had to slow down and leave his lane of travel because he believed he was going to be struck. The truck having to slow down caused the car behind it to veer into oncoming traffic.
quote:
If you want to argue that she also deserved to be charged with a crime and is deserving of the same vitriol being directed at Lacy, then that’s another discussion.
I've already said the driver of the car is also at fault. For the final time, this is not an either or situation. It is an AND situation because her being at fault DOES NOT ABSOLVE LACY OF FAULT.
His driving is the catalyst to the entire wreck.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:23 pm to sharkfhin
The car that swerved into oncoming traffic is not negligent. The gold and white car fall under no fault in this accident and Lacy is the negligent driver at fault. White car attempted a defensive drive maneuver but it resulted unfortunately in the loss of life.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:31 pm to sharkfhin
Gold truck could have been braking for debris, a dog or deer in the road, whatever. The woman behind him was too close and didn't brake until 0.5 sec before collision even though she said she saw him brake, then brake harder, then stop in the middle of the road. Had she been keeping proper distance and paying attention to the truck in front of her none of this would have happened. Not to mention her terrible instinct to swerve left into traffic.
Yes, Lacy was driving recklessly like Fast and Furious. Yes, he caused the gold truck to brake. But it's not his fault the lady was also driving recklessly. Imho, the fact that she didn't brake until 0.5 sec before impact shows she wasn't paying attention and was distracted by something. Lacy was driving like a maniac but her inattention to the road and poor reflexes is what ultimately caused the collision.
Yes, Lacy was driving recklessly like Fast and Furious. Yes, he caused the gold truck to brake. But it's not his fault the lady was also driving recklessly. Imho, the fact that she didn't brake until 0.5 sec before impact shows she wasn't paying attention and was distracted by something. Lacy was driving like a maniac but her inattention to the road and poor reflexes is what ultimately caused the collision.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:33 pm to lsutiger251
The car that swerved into oncoming traffic is not negligent. The gold and white car fall under no fault in this accident and Lacy is the negligent driver at fault. White car attempted a defensive drive maneuver but it resulted unfortunately in the loss of life.yeah she got "crossing left of center" citation and KL got a felony of Negligent homicide. In the picture it appears that the gold truck braked and pulled onto shoulder which put the cadenza in full sight of Lacy. Tbh, im surprised she didnt pull onto shoulder also. Weird.
Rip to the deceased in the accident
Rip to the deceased in the accident
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:34 pm to sharkfhin
quote:
1.Lacy triggered it in the act of breaking the law(negligent) 2.Gold truck(innocent) 3.Car serves to avoid gold truck cause she was following too close( negligent)
This is what appears to be the case.
What makes this a little more difficult and why I hate this is being put out there for trial in the public is that we don’t have the gold truck driver’s story on the LSP video. He left the scene, and they had to get a statement later - which can always skew facts. His testimony is really the key here and how close the driver of the white car was to him.
And yes, if she hits her breaks and either swerves to the right into what looks like a field or just rear ends the truck, everyone probably survives.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:36 pm to TigerV
quote:He gave testimony saying the white car was following close and swerved to avoid hitting him
His testimony is really the key here and how close the driver of the white car was to him.
This post was edited on 10/7/25 at 1:36 pm
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:36 pm to Adajax
quote:
Gold truck could have been braking for debris, a dog or deer in the road, whatever. The woman behind him was too close and didn't brake until 0.5 sec before collision even though she said she saw him brake, then brake harder, then stop in the middle of the road. Had she been keeping proper distance and paying attention to the truck in front of her none of this would have happened. Not to mention her terrible instinct to swerve left into traffic.
"He could have been braking for anything" is not a defense for Lacy.
He wasn't braking for a dog, or a person or debris. He was braking and swerved because of Lacy.
quote:
Yes, Lacy was driving recklessly like Fast and Furious. Yes, he caused the gold truck to brake. But it's not his fault the lady was also driving recklessly. Imho, the fact that she didn't brake until 0.5 sec before impact shows she wasn't paying attention and was distracted by something. Lacy was driving like a maniac but her inattention to the road and poor reflexes is what ultimately caused the collision.
fricks sake man. THE WOMAN'S NEGLIGENCE DOES NOT LESSEN LACY'S.
Two people can be negligent at the same time.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:37 pm to Adajax
Got it.
If you watch the video youll see that not only did gold truck hard brake, he pulled to the shoulder quickly and stopped which put the Cadenza in full view of KL. At that time was Lacy still in her lane or was back in his lane?
People are saying she swerved to avoid gold truck but in the picture , gold truck already pulled to the shoulder. Just seems like she made a premature reaction. My question is what were eyes seeing exactly when she swerved to hit the suv. Lacy bearing down on her or Lacy was back into his lane?
If you watch the video youll see that not only did gold truck hard brake, he pulled to the shoulder quickly and stopped which put the Cadenza in full view of KL. At that time was Lacy still in her lane or was back in his lane?
People are saying she swerved to avoid gold truck but in the picture , gold truck already pulled to the shoulder. Just seems like she made a premature reaction. My question is what were eyes seeing exactly when she swerved to hit the suv. Lacy bearing down on her or Lacy was back into his lane?
This post was edited on 10/7/25 at 1:51 pm
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:38 pm to RB10
Yet the LSP decided to not mention anything of the whit vehicle failing to brake for the truck and instead 100% beyond a shadow of a doubt incorrectly said “swerved to avoid collision with the dodge charger”
You don’t see that as an issue?
You don’t see that as an issue?
This post was edited on 10/7/25 at 1:39 pm
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:39 pm to zuluboudreaux
You gotta be an IDIOT getting in a crash that far away from Lacys car. Like for real it was so far away.
Page 19 of 60
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News