- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
It is a mistake to not roster these guys.
Posted on 9/5/26 at 6:47 am
Posted on 9/5/26 at 6:47 am
We drug our nuts over Sankey and the corrupt SEC in a court of law and got a fully enforceable order from that Court saying our guys could play. Make no mistake litigation and college football are both a form of warfare by other means and not taking full advantage of our total victory in the courtroom will lead to bad mojo up the road. These guys deserve to be on the roster and should be.
18
Posted on 9/5/26 at 6:48 am to T1gerNate
No its not. They now have an even larger case against Sankey and I still think there's a large chance he gets forced out after all this is done
Posted on 9/5/26 at 6:50 am to T1gerNate
It was the right thing to do (rostering them) - risky or not
Posted on 9/5/26 at 6:52 am to T1gerNate
Well in life nobody deserves anything
Everybody has valid points about the entire issue and we can all blame the NCAA for implementing this new rule a little too late
What I’m most upset about is Chambliss was Ineligible under the old rules and he’s ineligible under the current rules and yet there is no outcry.
There is no call for him to not play today and there’s no penalty against Ole Miss and I guess because the cats out of the bag across the country, we have too many players that have crossed that threshold and are going to play this year so that’s the hypocrisy in all of this and that’s unfortunate
Moving forward, we should be able to get back to where we only have college athletes who are no older than maybe 23
Indiana won a national championship with a team that was very mature. I guess we can put it that way..
Everybody has valid points about the entire issue and we can all blame the NCAA for implementing this new rule a little too late
What I’m most upset about is Chambliss was Ineligible under the old rules and he’s ineligible under the current rules and yet there is no outcry.
There is no call for him to not play today and there’s no penalty against Ole Miss and I guess because the cats out of the bag across the country, we have too many players that have crossed that threshold and are going to play this year so that’s the hypocrisy in all of this and that’s unfortunate
Moving forward, we should be able to get back to where we only have college athletes who are no older than maybe 23
Indiana won a national championship with a team that was very mature. I guess we can put it that way..
Posted on 9/5/26 at 6:54 am to T1gerNate
Shut up. You low IQ , IDIOT.
This post was edited on 9/5/26 at 6:56 am
Posted on 9/5/26 at 6:55 am to ApexTiger
quote:
Well in life nobody deserves anything
In the UNited States of America you deserve an opportunity to work just like any other man or woman
You don't deserve in equal outcome you do deserve equal opportunity
Posted on 9/5/26 at 6:55 am to T1gerNate
quote:
It is a mistake to not roster these guys.
I said this in another OP. Why even go through all these shenanigans if you decide to fold after getting a ruling it’s ok to play these guys and the SEC is forbidden to take action against you if you do.
Posted on 9/5/26 at 6:55 am to T1gerNate
LSU has experienced attorneys and compliance officers guiding them. They are doing what they should for the time being.
Posted on 9/5/26 at 6:57 am to T1gerNate
they were never going to be on the first week roster. acclimation period and one is injured.
Posted on 9/5/26 at 7:00 am to T1gerNate
quote:Nah. At least one of the two (perhaps both) has not even completed the requisite acclimatization period, and therefore ineligible to participate regardless of case status.
It is a mistake to not roster these guys.
Posted on 9/5/26 at 7:01 am to T1gerNate
Move on
Posted on 9/5/26 at 7:06 am to T1gerNate
quote:
These guys deserve to be on the roster and should be.
I agree
LSU will be fine, regardless of what those idiots in the SEC do. LSU football would be fine no matter what.
Posted on 9/5/26 at 7:06 am to T1gerNate
Chess over checkers my friend. It’s a long play. They’re not in game shape anyway. LSU has played this perfectly, hold the line. Keep the faith.
Remember BK and all his talk. “I’m keeping receipts”
Lane is different. Lane is fricking toying with these clowns.
Remember BK and all his talk. “I’m keeping receipts”
Lane is different. Lane is fricking toying with these clowns.
Posted on 9/5/26 at 7:11 am to T1gerNate
It feels like they are sitting there, and we can just let this play out with the case now in AL. Assuming they side with the SEC office, no problem. We haven’t played them. If they side with us, we add more depth. It is interesting that this is the hill Stanley is willing to die on, but not the Chambliss situation.
Posted on 9/5/26 at 7:12 am to Demonbengal
quote:
It feels like they are sitting there, and we can just let this play out with the case now in AL. Assuming they side with the SEC office, no problem. We haven’t played them. If they side with us, we add more depth.
I have the sneaking feeling this part will be slow played
Posted on 9/5/26 at 7:13 am to T1gerNate
Wrong. Kiffin’s not stupid.
Posted on 9/5/26 at 7:15 am to T1gerNate
quote:
We drug our nuts over Sankey and the corrupt SEC
not if they aren't playing today
Posted on 9/5/26 at 7:17 am to Yeti_Chaser
quote:
No its not. They now have an even larger case against Sankey and I still think there's a large chance he gets forced out after all this is done
Forced out by LSU? Because all of the other SEC schools are on Sankey’s side…
Posted on 9/5/26 at 7:20 am to T1gerNate
We as LSU didn’t do anything. The individual players drug their nuts over Sankey. LSU was not a party to that suit, only a bystander that said we would follow court orders.
The sec are the ones that involved us in a different suit that should be thrown us since they did it in retaliation to something we don’t control
The sec are the ones that involved us in a different suit that should be thrown us since they did it in retaliation to something we don’t control
Posted on 9/5/26 at 7:20 am to Revelator
quote:
said this in another OP. Why even go through all these shenanigans if you decide to fold after getting a ruling it’s ok to play these guys and the SEC is forbidden to take action against you if you do.
I agree that they should play them and frick the world but I think that if they get over ruled that the SEC would go scorched earth and that’s a chance they don’t want to take. I do t agree with it but being its two players we don’t necessarily need terribly, it’s prob the best idea. But it’s shitty that it comes to this and everyone else is doing it as well as Chambliss is going to play today.
I’m kind of thinking there is something bigger at play here
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News