Started By
Message

I wouldn’t play the nfl involved players

Posted on 8/29/26 at 5:04 pm
Posted by Picayuner
Member since Dec 2016
3879 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 5:04 pm
Don’t need them. Risking too much. They’re not that good
This post was edited on 8/29/26 at 5:05 pm
Posted by Party At LSU
Member since Nov 2005
11254 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 5:05 pm to
:facepalm:
Posted by vidtiger23
Member since Feb 2012
10034 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 5:06 pm to
You’re not really risking much at all. If they help then great.
Posted by redfish99
B.R.
Member since Aug 2007
19798 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 5:10 pm to
Thursday will tell the tale …..
Posted by FredbullTN
Houston
Member since Sep 2023
5714 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 5:10 pm to
Verge is probably kicking himself for paying CLK so much money when he could have had you for a case of Busch and a couple scratch offs
Posted by Gus007
TN
Member since Jul 2018
14974 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 5:12 pm to
I won't watch the NFL players.
I quit watching the NFL shortly after they legalized gambling.
Posted by NotaStarGazer
Member since Dec 2023
3221 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

hey’re not that good


The two football former Ole Miss players were both 2nd team All SEC last season. And the basketball player Luis was 2nd team All American. Post less!
Posted by rds dc
Member since Jun 2008
21764 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 5:18 pm to
quote:

Don’t need them. Risking too much. They’re not that good


Prediction: they won't play them. In fact, they might not even roster them.

The legal risk is just too high.

Even if an injunction is issued next Thursday (likely given the Judge), the NCAA will appeal, and a motion to stay will most likely be granted, and then players will be ineligible again. No point in going through the various scenarios, but a lot of them end with the SEC issuing penalties.

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


The only way to protect against that is not to play them or even roster them. Guaranteed behind closed doors, this is the advice that LSU leadership is getting from counsel.
Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
49032 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 5:25 pm to
quote:


:facepalm:


: dope:

Just remove the space after the first colon

Posted by GeauxLSUGeaux
1 room down from Erin Andrews
Member since May 2004
25704 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 5:30 pm to
quote:

I wouldn’t play the nfl involved players


This post was edited on 8/29/26 at 6:36 pm
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
61853 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 5:33 pm to
Thanks for letting us know.
Posted by NotaStarGazer
Member since Dec 2023
3221 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 5:33 pm to
Prediction: ASSUMING the Thursday ruling if favorable to the players, they WILL be on the LSU roster and Kiffin WILL put them into games...maybe not the first game or two because they haven't practiced with the team and don't know what kind of shape they are in
This post was edited on 8/29/26 at 5:35 pm
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
63737 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 5:36 pm to
The guy from Mississippi pretending to be an LSU fan suggests it’s too risky.
Posted by LesnarF5
Member since Apr 2015
10342 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 5:46 pm to
Harris, Wright and come Sunday Pyburn bitches. Can't wait. frick the pussy SEC they can all melt. If it makes them feel better about themselves to make Lane and LSU the villain knock yourself out ladies.
Posted by im4LSU
Hattiesburg, MS
Member since Aug 2004
34590 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 5:47 pm to
As long as the TRO holds up and they get the injunction, you’re literally risking nothing.
Posted by rds dc
Member since Jun 2008
21764 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 6:02 pm to
quote:


Prediction: ASSUMING the Thursday ruling if favorable to the players, they WILL be on the LSU roster and Kiffin WILL put them into games...maybe not the first game or two because they haven't practiced with the team and don't know what kind of shape they are in


That's certainly a possible outcome. I could see them playing if an injunction is issued on Thursday that still includes the SEC, and it survives the appeal process through the Louisiana Supreme Court, and the CFP doesn't ban pro players.
Posted by Laman1978
Earth
Member since Jan 2009
12080 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 6:03 pm to
You come straight from Facebook to share this stupid idea?
Posted by TigerFanFromBama
Pike Road, AL
Member since Mar 2015
4943 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 6:07 pm to
A full offseason of excitement/optimism coming to end with a legal battle for 2 or 3 players that won't make or break the outcome of the season.
Posted by LSUGraduate2002
Kenner
Member since Nov 2008
274 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 6:15 pm to
Don’t be a dumbass
Posted by dovehunter
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2014
2019 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 8:01 pm to
I think the much greater risk is to the SEC and NCAA for making an arbitrary and prejudicial decision affecting a group of athletics who should have had a right to make a living. I lived a lawsuit by a very powerful Fortune 500 company 35 years ago. We won and these players will win. LSU is on the right side of this issue and the SEC and NCAA have to be VERY careful how they pursue this case. My prediction is they will drop any further action against these young people.


This is a much bigger issue than should LSU play these guys. This is about a group of fairly powerless athletes up against a powerful monopoly that is trying to force their unconstitutional might against individuals and it's a serious violation of their civil rights. The NCAA will relent and the SEC will have no choice but to comply.
This post was edited on 8/29/26 at 8:03 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram