- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
I wouldn’t play the nfl involved players
Posted on 8/29/26 at 5:04 pm
Posted on 8/29/26 at 5:04 pm
Don’t need them. Risking too much. They’re not that good
This post was edited on 8/29/26 at 5:05 pm
Posted on 8/29/26 at 5:06 pm to Picayuner
You’re not really risking much at all. If they help then great.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 5:10 pm to Picayuner
Thursday will tell the tale …..
Posted on 8/29/26 at 5:10 pm to Picayuner
Verge is probably kicking himself for paying CLK so much money when he could have had you for a case of Busch and a couple scratch offs
Posted on 8/29/26 at 5:12 pm to Picayuner
I won't watch the NFL players.
I quit watching the NFL shortly after they legalized gambling.
I quit watching the NFL shortly after they legalized gambling.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 5:15 pm to Picayuner
quote:
hey’re not that good
Posted on 8/29/26 at 5:18 pm to Picayuner
quote:
Don’t need them. Risking too much. They’re not that good
Prediction: they won't play them. In fact, they might not even roster them.
The legal risk is just too high.
Even if an injunction is issued next Thursday (likely given the Judge), the NCAA will appeal, and a motion to stay will most likely be granted, and then players will be ineligible again. No point in going through the various scenarios, but a lot of them end with the SEC issuing penalties.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. The only way to protect against that is not to play them or even roster them. Guaranteed behind closed doors, this is the advice that LSU leadership is getting from counsel.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 5:25 pm to Party At LSU
quote:
:facepalm:
: dope:
Just remove the space after the first colon

Posted on 8/29/26 at 5:30 pm to Picayuner
quote:
I wouldn’t play the nfl involved players

This post was edited on 8/29/26 at 6:36 pm
Posted on 8/29/26 at 5:33 pm to Picayuner
Thanks for letting us know.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 5:33 pm to rds dc
Prediction: ASSUMING the Thursday ruling if favorable to the players, they WILL be on the LSU roster and Kiffin WILL put them into games...maybe not the first game or two because they haven't practiced with the team and don't know what kind of shape they are in
This post was edited on 8/29/26 at 5:35 pm
Posted on 8/29/26 at 5:36 pm to Picayuner
The guy from Mississippi pretending to be an LSU fan suggests it’s too risky.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 5:46 pm to moneyg
Harris, Wright and come Sunday Pyburn bitches. Can't wait. frick the pussy SEC they can all melt. If it makes them feel better about themselves to make Lane and LSU the villain knock yourself out ladies. 
Posted on 8/29/26 at 5:47 pm to Picayuner
As long as the TRO holds up and they get the injunction, you’re literally risking nothing.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 6:02 pm to NotaStarGazer
quote:
Prediction: ASSUMING the Thursday ruling if favorable to the players, they WILL be on the LSU roster and Kiffin WILL put them into games...maybe not the first game or two because they haven't practiced with the team and don't know what kind of shape they are in
That's certainly a possible outcome. I could see them playing if an injunction is issued on Thursday that still includes the SEC, and it survives the appeal process through the Louisiana Supreme Court, and the CFP doesn't ban pro players.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 6:03 pm to Picayuner
You come straight from Facebook to share this stupid idea?
Posted on 8/29/26 at 6:07 pm to rds dc
A full offseason of excitement/optimism coming to end with a legal battle for 2 or 3 players that won't make or break the outcome of the season.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 8:01 pm to LSUGraduate2002
I think the much greater risk is to the SEC and NCAA for making an arbitrary and prejudicial decision affecting a group of athletics who should have had a right to make a living. I lived a lawsuit by a very powerful Fortune 500 company 35 years ago. We won and these players will win. LSU is on the right side of this issue and the SEC and NCAA have to be VERY careful how they pursue this case. My prediction is they will drop any further action against these young people.
This is a much bigger issue than should LSU play these guys. This is about a group of fairly powerless athletes up against a powerful monopoly that is trying to force their unconstitutional might against individuals and it's a serious violation of their civil rights. The NCAA will relent and the SEC will have no choice but to comply.
This is a much bigger issue than should LSU play these guys. This is about a group of fairly powerless athletes up against a powerful monopoly that is trying to force their unconstitutional might against individuals and it's a serious violation of their civil rights. The NCAA will relent and the SEC will have no choice but to comply.
This post was edited on 8/29/26 at 8:03 pm
Popular
Back to top

15







