- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I heard on the radio this morning coach O wanted to go back to pro style
Posted on 11/29/17 at 1:51 pm to Fat Bastard
Posted on 11/29/17 at 1:51 pm to Fat Bastard
quote:That doesn't change anything.
we have plenty coaches and NON football ignorant posters who post here whether you realize that or not
quote:No.
speak for yourself please
quote:Bottom 10 poster, easily.
Fat Bastard
2
Posted on 11/29/17 at 1:52 pm to AlxTgr
You're being generous
Posted on 11/29/17 at 1:55 pm to Datbayoubengal
Urban Meyer and his malzahn also use H backs and are not always in 3 or 4 wide but they run power spread offenses. It’s not pro style. Canada uses spread concepts. He is multiple and can run many things when needed. People here need to learn wtf is what. Yeah Canada ran pro style here this year just like Norm chows pro and jimbos pro style. 
Posted on 11/29/17 at 1:59 pm to AlxTgr
You are so mad! Are you as clueless on poli and money board as here? I’d venture to guess yes!
But hey keep posting on Facebook about these issues also. I’m sure you’ve got it covered right coaCH? Lmao ??
But hey keep posting on Facebook about these issues also. I’m sure you’ve got it covered right coaCH? Lmao ??
Posted on 11/29/17 at 2:04 pm to Tigerfan53
I wish O would go
Posted on 11/29/17 at 2:07 pm to Brazos
He’s trying to go back to his old ways. He still has old USC days on his mind.
I’d go with whatever style OU and Clemson run. Canada’s offense is actually perfect for LSU, especially with a mobile QB.
I’d go with whatever style OU and Clemson run. Canada’s offense is actually perfect for LSU, especially with a mobile QB.
Posted on 11/29/17 at 2:11 pm to Tigerfan53
Well by God if YOU heard it on the radio then it must be true. Lol.
Good Lord.
Good Lord.
Posted on 11/29/17 at 2:13 pm to Fat Bastard
quote:
You are so mad!
Does that really work for you? I mean, i know you're dumb, but is that supposed to mean something?
quote:Money board?
Are you as clueless on poli and money board as here?
quote:Do you have a disability you're not disclosing?
But hey keep posting on Facebook about these issues also. I’m sure you’ve got it covered right coaCH? Lmao ??
Posted on 11/29/17 at 2:14 pm to TH03
quote:Me too, but O was not going to risk losing his job by playing inexperienced Brennan over Etling. Orgeron hears everything because he has local people in his ear, all the time. Hell, his mother probably tells him everything folks down on the bayou are saying. He knows half of the fanbase didn't want him. He knew that shite would have gotten hot real quick with loss, after loss, after loss. He gave zero shites about Brennan; only winning enough games to keep the unhappy fans at bay.
I trust the opinion of the proven offensive mind
Posted on 11/29/17 at 2:19 pm to Goldrush25
You are looking at it completely opposite.
You are saying you’d rather beat Troy than beat Auburn and UF. Seriously?
You are saying you’d rather beat Troy than beat Auburn and UF. Seriously?
Posted on 11/29/17 at 2:40 pm to ell_13
A career DL coach can't make up his mind what type offense he wants to run, ha you don't say. These and many other reasons are why people are worried. Plus the meddling and tinkering. There is a reason he was on zero radars for a HC gig, but hey, he's a native and all that crap.
Posted on 11/29/17 at 2:44 pm to NoGeaux
quote:
he has wanted the “USC” type offense since Lane Kiffin was in play.
Then join the PAC 12, find back to back Heisman QBs and buy a Heisman RB a house and we comin!!
This post was edited on 11/29/17 at 2:48 pm
Posted on 11/29/17 at 2:47 pm to ell_13
quote:
You are saying you’d rather beat Troy than beat Auburn and UF. Seriously?
This is how I know he's challenged. Trade a Troy win for a conference loss or two.
Mind-boggling!!!!
Posted on 11/29/17 at 2:50 pm to Tigerfan53
I 100% support this. There is a reason that the most advanced league in the sport of football deploy "pro style" offenses. It is because they work the best against great athletes and defenses. There are many styles of pro offenses. Take a look at the balance of the Patriots, Steelers, Seattle, Philly, etc., We should be running a form of PRO, and not the stuff of Canada -- who needs to go.
Posted on 11/29/17 at 3:10 pm to ell_13
quote:
You are looking at it completely opposite. You are saying you’d rather beat Troy than beat Auburn and UF. Seriously?
I'D RATHER NOT LOSE TO FREAKING TROY. PERIOD.
How hard is that to understand. It's a sad state of affars that we even have to have this ridiculous conversation.
So freaking sad that people like you think losing to Troy is ok.
LSU should never lose to Troy. I don't give a damn what games we win after it. It doesn't make up for it. You understand that?
No team that loses to Troy will ever play for anything significant.
This post was edited on 11/29/17 at 3:14 pm
Posted on 11/29/17 at 3:33 pm to Geauxst Writer
quote:
I 100% support this. There is a reason that the most advanced league in the sport of football deploy "pro style" offenses. It is because they work the best against great athletes and defenses. There are many styles of pro offenses. Take a look at the balance of the Patriots, Steelers, Seattle, Philly, etc., We should be running a form of PRO, and not the stuff of Canada -- who needs to go.
Do you hate O and LSU?
There are 5-6 teams on next year’s schedule that are built and talented enough to stop that style offense. Don’t let the wins from 2016 fool you, that’s not the kind of schedule we face ahead.
This post was edited on 11/29/17 at 3:36 pm
Posted on 11/29/17 at 3:55 pm to Tigerfan53
If he wants to go back to 3 yards and a cloud of dust then he needs to be replaced asap! He will never beat Saban with that offense.
I think a lot of non-offensive coaches revert back to that type of offense because that's all they understand. If he don't understand how and why our offense works now them he is the one that needs to be showed the door. We would have a losing record and got blowed out by Bama with DE at qb in a prostyle offense this year.
I think a lot of non-offensive coaches revert back to that type of offense because that's all they understand. If he don't understand how and why our offense works now them he is the one that needs to be showed the door. We would have a losing record and got blowed out by Bama with DE at qb in a prostyle offense this year.
Posted on 11/29/17 at 4:00 pm to ell_13
quote:
Canada wanted up tempo, 4 WR sets, and Brennan.
Y'all are just making this shite up. Get off the internet and go do your homework!
Posted on 11/29/17 at 4:42 pm to offshoretrash
Generally agree, but
*blown
*blown
Posted on 11/29/17 at 4:52 pm to Tigerfan53
our offense only began to work this year when the players got comfortable with all of the shifts and their roles. for the first time in a LONG time, our plays were not uber predictable and we made first downs via passes to TE's and RB's and ran the wildcat successfully. we demolished the aggie defense BECAUSE they sold out to the run and stacked the box and Etling burned them.
if we go back to pro style only, we are in trouble. this years offense was just getting going and our red zone problems were greatly improved.
if we go back to pro style only, we are in trouble. this years offense was just getting going and our red zone problems were greatly improved.
Page 6 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News